• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

rope brake

  • Thread starter Thread starter axia94
  • Start date Start date

axia94

Guest
Good morning to all, I have the following problem:

together full bicycle, I have to draw the brake rope (to make the spare kit for the customers, then create a new part that I will call 'brake rope or sheath'.I can not create the rope externally to the axieme, because this has a starting point, two loops where it passes, twists here and la and eventually enters the rubber brake on the wheel.
They are together, insert new part, rename, rope brake, change part and then........maledetta corda del brake! ! ! ! ! !
:36_1_5:
thanks to all for magnanimity and courtesy
 
I didn't understand why your eyes were twisted. Can't you rename?
However you have to solve a lot of things even with the property seems to me.
try to explain yourself why I'm a bit obtuse...:tongue:
 
Good morning to all, I have the following problem:

complete bicycle, I must draw the brake rope (to make the spare kit for customers, then create a new part that I will call "brake or sheath"
here we are
I can't create the rope externally to the axieme, because this has a starting point, two suns where it passes, twists, curves of here and of la and eventually enters the rubber brake on the wheel.
In fact, you have to create it inside the axieme.
They are together, insert new part, rename, rope brake, change part and then........maledetta corda del brake! ! ! ! ! !
At this point you translate, because you do not understand what you need or what does not work.. .

Hi.
 
no problem, indeed,
I am in a set (I can create the part only here), I have to draw a ø10 cable that starts from a ø11 accommodation located in one part, I have to pass through two compasses with internal hole 11 located on other parts and on other floors, and I have to finish the race in the new ø11 accommodation located on a last part
(you know the brake of your bicycle that percous does?, starts from the lever on the handlebar and ends in the jaw with rubbers located on both wheels, passing inside the pipes of the shell and through straps scattered here and there: here I have to draw the ropes of the brakes because I have to give in the workshop the length of the stretch that comes to create and devote (tirating the levers of the brakes) make move the ganasce.
forgives the confusing exposure of the case....

Thanks
 
no problem, indeed,
I am in a set (I can create the part only here), I have to draw a ø10 cable that starts from a ø11 accommodation located in one part, I have to pass through two compasses with internal hole 11 located on other parts and on other floors, and I have to finish the race in the new ø11 accommodation located on a last part
(Do you know the brake of your bicycle that percose does? )
insert the new part into the axieme by selecting one of the main planes of the axieme, regenerate leaving the sketch open automatically, which will be deleted.
now create a sketch3d by passing a spline or strings and tangent lines between them in the path of your cable, having the kindness to connect the extremes to the starting and arrival points and exit from the sketch.
to one of the ends of the 3d curve, if you don't already have it, create a perpendicular and conicident plan with the extreme drawings a circle diameter 10, exit from the sketch.
do a sweep by selecting as a path the 3d sketch that represents the sheath and as a profile the diameter 10 circle.
done.

Hi.
 
What kind of brakes do you have?

Bye.
You took away my mouth words:. will have a cast iron bike (to make shiren happy :smile:).
@ axia94 follow the instructions of marcof, or if you have a premium version you can do it with routing/wiring.
but you will have a solid and static model, forget to pull the levers and operate the brakes in real time.. (yes, configurations etc., but it's a mess)

greetings
Mar
 
Maybe it's ø10 trouble, isn't it?
even the hand brake of the car has such a big cordina.. .

I think the 3d sketch will be a mess.. .
 
I found myself in a while ago in front of a similar problem for the design of flexible pipes. the problem lies in the fact that the sweeping path should have changed if the position of a certain mechanical arm moved in the together in such case in fact the mating modes set previously to the pipe heads were inevitably no longer reliable... so I did so:
1) in the environment together I create a 3d sketch with a spline having to the extreme two lines of construction from indifferent length useful to the sole purpose of controlling the tangence of the spline. I'm out of the sketch.
2) select the sketch created and copy from the edit menu.
3) I create a new file (part) where I paste, insert a reference plan perpendicular to the spline ( selecting the point of one of the garments and the spline ). at this point a simple sweep and I made the tube.
4) I now put in the set but in the mating rules I do not have to select the surface of the pipe just imported, but I climb up to the sketch level of the same (resting in the set) and place the line of construction at the extreme of the concentric spline to the part that represents the starting point then in the set (even if in transparency these remain selectable) and so I also do to the other head, after exit from the sketch and the game is done. in this way the sheath will be updated inside the assembly as it will follow the mating rules that reside in the sketch of the same and not in its surfaces.
I hope I was not disproportionate in the explanation, but I wanted to be sufficiently unique in the explanatory steps.
in words it is a mess but it takes 10 seconds!
 
I found myself in a while ago in front of a similar problem for the design of flexible pipes. the problem lies in the fact that the sweeping path should have changed if the position of a certain mechanical arm moved in the together in such case in fact the mating modes set previously to the pipe heads were inevitably no longer reliable... so I did so:
1) in the environment together I create a 3d sketch with a spline having to the extreme two lines of construction from indifferent length useful to the sole purpose of controlling the tangence of the spline. I'm out of the sketch.
2) select the sketch created and copy from the edit menu.
3) I create a new file (part) where I paste, insert a reference plan perpendicular to the spline ( selecting the point of one of the garments and the spline ). at this point a simple sweep and I made the tube.
4) I now put in the set but in the mating rules I do not have to select the surface of the pipe just imported, but I climb up to the sketch level of the same (resting in the set) and place the line of construction at the extreme of the concentric spline to the part that represents the starting point then in the set (even if in transparency these remain selectable) and so I also do to the other head, after exit from the sketch and the game is done. in this way the sheath will be updated inside the assembly as it will follow the mating rules that reside in the sketch of the same and not in its surfaces.
I hope I was not disproportionate in the explanation, but I wanted to be sufficiently unique in the explanatory steps.
in words it is a mess but it takes 10 seconds!
I have followed your procedure in mind, but I miss what is the difference between the spline of the part created in assembly that guides the sweep, connected to the ends of the respective starting plans, inserting together the concentric and tangency relationships that serve, and the result obtained with your procedure
if the 3d spline or the 3d string series are referred to as you owe the assembly there should be no update issues.
 
...the process is identical...sometimes, but by doing the part directly in assembly I broke the boxes in reconstruction if I modified even minimum positions of the assemblies, I don't know why.
 
You took away my mouth words:. will have a cast iron bike (to make shiren happy :smile:).
@ axia94 follow the instructions of marcof, or if you have a premium version you can do it with routing/wiring.
but you will have a solid and static model, forget to pull the levers and operate the brakes in real time.. (yes, configurations etc., but it's a mess)

greetings
Mar
ah ah ah, that of the bicycline was a perfect example for the component I have to do, in relativity it is a traction cable unblocking cart of the lower shell of a helicopter model.

friendly and courteous all, and especially of great help

good day to all and good work:4410:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top