michina
Guest
hi guys, I found many rpc for revit, you know if and possibly how they are convertible in .rpc format?
thanks:redface:
thanks:redface:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
frcprogetti
Guest
hi michina, if they are rpc surely are ready for use you do not need to convert them.
Hi.
Hi.
michina
Guest
hi roberto, no, they are in .rfa....families. . .
gfrank
Guest
basically the rpc (rich photorealistic content) are created of the archive, in which to a template, a specific texture is applied plants/persons/cars/ecc..) so that:
- the shape is displayed in the views and in the 3d
- the texture in rendering
the "rpc objects" are managed by a sw called acm (I am not experienced in the matter), which if not erro, in light version is included in mental ray (or something like that).
Therefore, if you have revit rfa families, which cannot be used as rpc, applying to them specific materials (texture), can be used as other families.
of course, the result depends on the "form" of the family and the texture applied for rendering.
- the shape is displayed in the views and in the 3d
- the texture in rendering
the "rpc objects" are managed by a sw called acm (I am not experienced in the matter), which if not erro, in light version is included in mental ray (or something like that).
Therefore, if you have revit rfa families, which cannot be used as rpc, applying to them specific materials (texture), can be used as other families.
of course, the result depends on the "form" of the family and the texture applied for rendering.
Last edited:
michina
Guest
thanks gfrank, therefore deduct, not usable in max....(the rfa file)
Miki
Miki
gfrank
Guest
I do not use max, but if you carry the family in dwg, with allocation of the materials and indicating the layers, it seems to me that you can import in max..
michina
Guest
provo...grazie:smile: