search for a practical cad

[jim78b]

in my work I propose offers in practice of chests x galleries the drawings are in dwg in 2d cost from many blocks every time I have to adapt the crates to the geometries of the galleries and very laborious .is a cad 2d intuitive practical x this type of work ?or the cad and too technical?

 

[Tristan]

in my work I propose offers in practice of chests x galleries the drawings are in dwg in 2d cost from many blocks every time I have to adapt the crates to the geometries of the galleries and very laborious .is a cad 2d intuitive practical x this type of work ?or the cad and too technical?

so on two feet would use dynamic autocad blocks

 

[jim78b]

Yes, but it seems rather difficult to set that radiated geometry fits every time or can you?

 

[jim78b]

place the image of the type of work I do, you see the crates in 2d , every time you change the section to "hand" suitable all doors plates hinges etc....

 

[Tristan]

place the image of the type of work I do, you see the crates in 2d , every time you change the section to "hand" suitable all doors plates hinges etc....

I didn't make it so complicated. you could make a dynamic block but you have to study it well. in 2010 they introduced dimensional and geometric constraints that would certainly give a hand, but not being expert in galleries and caskets I can not tell you with certainty how and if you manage to do it smoothly. . .

 

[cacciatorino]

place the image of the type of work I do, you see the crates in 2d , every time you change the section to "hand" suitable all doors plates hinges etc....

Try to give a solid edge 2d look, it's free and totally parametric.
http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/velocity/solidedge/free2d/index.shtml

 

[jim78b]

You say it's better than autocad? Perhaps you impose a det value... .

 

[cacciatorino]

You say it's better than autocad? Perhaps you impose a det value... .

I don't know autocad, but if you're often using geometries like a parametric cad is great for you.

By setting the blocks well, you can then edit the keyboard size and keep the "snap" between the primitives automatically, even when the dimensions change.

 

[Tristan]

I don't know autocad, but if you're often using geometries like a parametric cad is great for you.

By setting the blocks well, you can then edit the keyboard size and keep the "snap" between the primitives automatically, even when the dimensions change.

This also makes it autocad... only sin not free :biggrin:

 

[cacciatorino]

I want him to do a carcad...

They've arrived at the voucher! :biggrin:

 

[Tristan]

They've arrived at the voucher! :biggrin:

Yes; they took a piece of inventor and kicked him out of prepotence in autocad, but for now only on the older brother, not in lt.

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

Bah... I don't think a dynamic block solves the problem. Sometimes design is also taking into account certain convenience factors (for example a 12-metre long beam, it will cost you more than 4 3 m trunks rebuilding the 12m).
or 2 from 3 meters and one from 6 for reasons of reach of the joints. . .
How do you codify these choices in a dynamic block?

 

[Tristan]

Bah... I don't think a dynamic block solves the problem. Sometimes design is also taking into account certain convenience factors (for example a 12-metre long beam, it will cost you more than 4 3 m trunks rebuilding the 12m).
or 2 from 3 meters and one from 6 for reasons of reach of the joints. . .
How do you codify these choices in a dynamic block?

Yes, I agree. It's too big a problem to be handled with a "symbol." I believe that every gallery has its own grains and that it cannot be generalized to this point

 

[Fulvio Romano]

Bah... I don't think a dynamic block solves the problem. Sometimes design is also taking into account certain convenience factors (for example a 12-metre long beam, it will cost you more than 4 3 m trunks rebuilding the 12m).
or 2 from 3 meters and one from 6 for reasons of reach of the joints. . .
How do you codify these choices in a dynamic block?

and less bad, otherwise why pay a designer if the cad does it alone? :tongue:

However, a dynamic block that gives the "la" to supervise with a little brain, maybe helps.
only that making the starting blocks takes so much time, depends on how much it is worth it.

 

[MBT]

and less bad, otherwise why pay a designer if the cad does it alone? :tongue:

I think this is the philosophy of some users. . .
the design makes the s...
Or not? ? ?

 

[cacciatorino]

I think this is the philosophy of some users. . .
the design makes the s...
Or not? ? ?

I realized that the subtext was: "if there's no carcad, then it's useless!" probably all of us using parametric systems are wasting time! :biggrin: