• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

seeger seats and their position compared to bearing rings [off topic? ♪

  • Thread starter Thread starter gingia
  • Start date Start date
update on the situation: do not renew my contract :-)
..."you want a little because the job has dropped because blah blah blah blah we decided not to continue the collaboration"
But is it about that company?
..."bla blah blah not but also for blah blah"
But what did I do wrong? "...bla blah..."

I mean, he didn't tell me what I was wrong and he confirmed the problem with bened company.
I'm pretty happy about that, because I really wanted to move to another city.
:-)

However it is still a rospo to swallow or
 
I'm not a mechanic, but I've had something to do with an American client. we had to produce a product made by us with design made by us but developed with them.
apart from the initial development, which was followed also by their on-going technician, all drawings (and then details) were sent to them to bless.
if they found mistakes they reported it and we correct it, but more often to explain why that solution was good.
if they were convinced, well; otherwise they made the change.
at the end of all we send the first samples. They're not good. Let's check both us and them.
This is a structural problem, a deformation we had not foreseen.
in theory we all had a certain experience but it ran away the same.
and since on the design there was their blessing, they did not argue.
the change has been made and we have continued the collaboration.
all this to say, even from comments made by colleagues and acquaintances, that the blessing on the design should always be required: In the background more eyes that control are a safety for everyone.
 
I'm not a mechanic, but I've had something to do with an American client. we had to produce a product made by us with design made by us but developed with them.
apart from the initial development, which was followed also by their on-going technician, all drawings (and then details) were sent to them to bless.
if they found mistakes they reported it and we correct it, but more often to explain why that solution was good.
if they were convinced, well; otherwise they made the change.
at the end of all we send the first samples. They're not good. Let's check both us and them.
This is a structural problem, a deformation we had not foreseen.
in theory we all had a certain experience but it ran away the same.
and since on the design there was their blessing, they did not argue.
the change has been made and we have continued the collaboration.
all this to say, even from comments made by colleagues and acquaintances, that the blessing on the design should always be required: In the background more eyes that control are a safety for everyone.
already that they send you a list of errors with ''renderized' representations, it leaves me a little puzzled.
technical reports should be used for technical representations.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top