semi-finished raw update

[valeriob]

Good morning, everyone. I'd like to know what the procedure is to be done to make a semi-finished raw. I'll explain. we picture a simple piece, a rectangular solid 100mmx100mmx50mm. the starting rough incorporates the finished with an overmetal of 10mm on all the dimensions of the finished i.e. 110x110x60. the finished has a pocket on the upper face and another on the lower one, not passing and not communicating between them. the procedure of execution, I am a cn miller, is to spy first the surface, contornare externally the piece by half height, 25mm, perform a first pocket. You get the first part. so also in the cam that in the path verification environment will go to eat the crude half. when I have to perform the second part, I will need, in cam environment, of course of the finished turned 180° compared to before but I will need to carry behind the semi-finished crude that will have to appear in verification precisely semi-finished so that I can see that the various finishes coincide and that I will not have material that could hinder the fresa in work. how can I keep the raw semifinished in check between first and second part? The example is simple, but I happen to have to cut pieces in several parts, even from semi-finished lathes. or processing in 3d roughed first and finished second and for all these cases and very useful to have an always updated raw semi-finished even to conceive the right attack of the tools in work.
I hope I was clear, thanks to all those who will answer me.
ps. mastercam x5.

 

[valeriob]

more than 70 visits and no answers? Help!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

more than 70 visits and no answers?

did you not think that maybe the visits were made for mere curiosity even by those who have no knowledge of cam and its applications?
or who has read, though interested, have no answers to your questions?
70 visits to a forum that has over 76000 users seems to me little.
reading your past questions is not that you are one of those who are wasted to say if they solved with the suggestions they had giving way to the forum to grow and be useful to those who have the same problems read the threads.

 

[valeriob]

Never visited sections of the forum that I'm disentered, I don't see why others should do it, I'll be tremendously selfish. In any case, there are far more valid reasons to get mad at Massivonweizen. I said this, my little and not assiduous attendance of the forum is mainly due to the fact that, since I do not use the programs by profession, I try not to "lose" too long by asking trivial questions to whom the forum attends for work.
I assure you that a cam operator is very trivial.
So I'm gonna wait patiently for an answer to the discussion.
Good Christmas to everyone, or almost.

 

[Archimede Pitagorico]

Hello, sin you do not read other sections of the forum... sometimes you learn something only by reading... by curiosity, even without intervention in the discussions. . .

I press that I am not a cam operator... but a passionate

for your "problem" (according to me) you have to set your crude 110x110x60... fresarlo... the fried save it as "shaped file" in .stl... open with x5 your .stl and rotate it 180 degrees (oriented as it serves you) and raise it... re-import it inside your x5 by reloading it from "sagome... from file"... this operation (saving the crude after a milling) should be done every time you do a long workmanship to avoid long simulation times. Of course if you have to "pure" rotate the crude... save... orienti... amounts... other roads (in my miserable experience) I don't know about it. seems a long procedure to read it... but they are 4 clicks.

Happy Christmas

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In any case, there are far more valid reasons to get mad at Massivonweizen.

It was absolutely not an angry answer, but a spur to a reflection. by the way the up in the messages is prohibited (read point 8 of Regulation)

said this, my little and unsatisfied forum attendance is mainly due to the fact that, since I do not use programs by profession, I try not to "lose" too much time by asking trivial questions to whom the forum attends it for work.
what I posted I assure you that for a cam operator It's very banal..

Is there a cross-sensitivity not just beyond the fact that if you are ignorant about the matter, otherwise you would not rightly place the question, what means do you have to establish its banality?

So I'm gonna wait patiently for an answer to the discussion.

but unfortunately you didn't just write the post #2
I do not comment on the phrase of wishes because really of bad taste and, in my opinion, assimilable to a sick child.

But I liked the part where you didn't argue that in past threads you abstained from saying whether suggestions had been helpful or not; hard to the piece and always present to ask much less to share

 

[valeriob]

thanks archimede pitagorico. I'll prove how much you recommended me. I had not thought about saving and reopening .stl files this type
of files if opened in a modeler, type solidworks, appears as a solid with lots of faces resulting in "heavy" and little particulate, but perhaps suitable for what I have to do in mastercam.

 

[Archimede Pitagorico]

to rotate/orient a .stl of your crude does not open it (according to me) with other software... but with the same x5. with two clicks a rough twist it like a sock and it is more practical to save-import if you use a single program. Then you see how you feel better. . .
Hi.

 

[Archimede Pitagorico]

valeriob.. . .
you solved the due "problems" che avevi?