sheet metal processing for tank

[Mike1967]

less bad we weren't all in the same bar... You know you're drinking. to every post... and that drunk.... :biggrin:

♪

 

[RS4]

Egregi gentlemen, mine was just an example thrown them with random measures.
for my incompetence I have not been able to remove the vertical wall and the semicircle above, as the reality of the reservoir is yes that profile but with an external radius from 2 meters for 360 degrees. the smaller hole that would form above (diameter 80 cm) is however disassato non coaxial and moved to the left of trunk 30 cm regarding the diameter of 4 meters. (They are stainless steel tanks for high food 7 mt).
question: with solidworks 2011 can you create everything and develop it or not? Can you make a step?
Hello, everyone.

I hope I have understood I have used the size you requested v5 I have developed it quietly I gave 2mm of thikness hole disused from the plot of 300mm total height 1000mm

allego step file

Let me know I hope you've been helped

Hi.


♪

 

[Mike1967]

Have fun frazionarlo... :biggrin: (see photo)

 

[RS4]

I hope I have understood I have used the size you requested v5 I have developed it quietly I gave 2mm of thikness hole disused from the plot of 300mm total height 1000mm

allego step file

Let me know I hope you've been helped

Hi.


♪

I add the 2 version with the cut hole built on a 1000mm offset top


Hi.

♪

 

[Mike1967]

I add the 2 version with the cut hole built on a 1000mm offset top


Hi.

♪

hi rs4, would you do a test as from image attached?
I bet your sw will pull out an identical development for the two logs
cone. not realistic, of course.:smile:

 

[Mike1967]

new... developments?:biggrin:

 

[RS4]

hi rs4, would you do a test as from image attached?
I bet your sw will pull out an identical development for the two logs
cone. not realistic, of course.:smile:

Hi.

the results of my development are totally different the developed mathematics.

Why did you think the geomtria stax came?

let me understand your safety in affirming this

allego img
photos1 sheet metal for tank_250_x_mike.jpg
photos sheet metal processing for tank_800_x_mike.jpg


Hi.

♪

 

[Mike1967]

well, but as you did it is the traditional way, mathematical geometry
without stretching or elastic deformations.
what I don't understand is why in other developments you posted
There is no laceration in the sheet, it is imbuted.
from here I wondered how he would develop my models always with that
system.
if you notice, in your version 2, the hole is not symmetric, it has an ovalized appearance, moreover the loft creates the "bombata" hopper, from these considerations
I wondered what bases the sw has drawn to guess a supposed correct development. That's all.
I tell you what because in the past I used rhino, even that unrolls everything, but it wasn't
for granted that flattening was consistent with what should be in relativity.
tested on the field.
pieces like those are my daily bread.

:finger:

 

[RS4]

well, but as you did it is the traditional way, mathematical geometry
without stretching or elastic deformations.
what I don't understand is why in other developments you posted
There is no laceration in the sheet, it is imbuted.
from here I wondered how he would develop my models always with that
system.
if you notice, in your version 2, the hole is not symmetric, it has an ovalized appearance, moreover the loft creates the "bombata" hopper, from these considerations
I wondered what bases the sw has drawn to guess a supposed correct development. That's all.
I tell you what because in the past I used rhino, even that unrolls everything, but it wasn't
for granted that flattening was consistent with what should be in relativity.
tested on the field.
pieces like those are my daily bread.

:finger:

I try tonight if I can continue with the tests:

You tell me what material I have to give him? ?

premetto that I take care of more developments in composite and not sheet metal


Hi.

♪