simulations tolerances montecarlo solidworks

[ceccagoal]

Good day to all, it's the first time I've been writing excuse me if I do some gaffe but I've never written in a forum, I have a problem and I would like to know if there is anyone here who can route me politely. I practically have to deal with a platform that has to mate with two other equal extensions through plates with holes. I was asked through solidworks if I can perform a simulation to find the optimal tolerance ranges in geometric terms. I explain better practically there is a central frame and on its sides I have to connect these two extensions verifying that you do not create a step in terms of height due to the coupling with the plates and that everything remains orthogonal respect a reference plan would be that of support of the entire structure sove are the wheels, moreover once coupled there is a tolerance of parallelism of 0.5 between the extreme sides of the structure in time is a structure in all about 4 meters I attach a photo of the structure to make you understand better. my question is how to do with solid works to assign on the 3d tolerances with their ranges the reference plans and then simulate the software that the tolerance ranges set are right or can be enlarged to save on costs? thanks for the attention

 

[Mike1967]

0.5 mm on 4 meters seem utopian.
It is also unclear whether tolerances serve you only at the theoretical level or after construction (and here I see it hard).

 

[ceccagoal]

0.5 is obtained because they are put dishes that are then processed. However, I think that 0.5 are cm. practically there was a structure already existing in a company similar to what I posted only that the extensions were connected with longitudinal cutting. for design reasons the structure has been redesigned in this way with the extensions attached transversally and now they have to reassign the tolerances that were present on the old drawings. My job is just a verification, i.e. using the previous tolerances see if the range of tolerances used are optimal to have a good assembly only that the software I had to use of nsx there are problems with the university license, then I wondered if it is possible to make those checks with solidworks so as to accelerate the times. Plus, I know how to use solids only to draw and at most some cinematic or thermal simulations, but on tolerances I don't know what instrument to use, but I never used it. I attach a photo of the central frame and extensions with all the specifications so that I understand what I mean. Thank you for answering me I hope you can give me some tips!

 

[Mike1967]

0.5 is obtained because they are put dishes that are then processed. However, I think that 0.5 are cm. practically there was a structure already existing in a company similar to what I posted only that the extensions were connected with longitudinal cutting. for design reasons the structure has been redesigned in this way with the extensions attached transversally and now they have to reassign the tolerances that were present on the old drawings. My job is just a verification, i.e. using the previous tolerances see if the range of tolerances used are optimal to have a good assembly only that the software I had to use of nsx there are problems with the university license, then I wondered if it is possible to make those checks with solidworks so as to accelerate the times. Plus, I know how to use solids only to draw and at most some cinematic or thermal simulations, but on tolerances I don't know what instrument to use, but I never used it. I attach a photo of the central frame and extensions with all the specifications so that I understand what I mean. Thank you for answering me I hope you can give me some tips!

the tolerance I see in the attachments of 0.5 is in mm... then you do.

 

[ceccagoal]

is right are in mm, but in any case we can get them because a similar construction with longitudinal extensions already exists with those tolerances. Can you help me with the solid works part? thanks again and good day