volaff
Guest
Hello, everyone.
I was asking myself a question.
provided that I use a fem sporadically, what is the correct strategy to be able to analyze a single component of a set without having all the assemblies? ? ?
I'll explain.
Let's pretend that it has the component a (connected to the ground with any constraints) while the load acts on another component b placed in the distance from a; how can I do to study an analysis on if this is not loaded?
someone will say, do some calculations in terms of forces and moments and proceed (I agree) but if you do not want to do so i.e. if I know the loads and distances on b, I can somehow create something fictitious b that once loaded gives me results on a? ?
I don't know if I was clear.
Thank you for your attention!
good continuation of the day!
I was asking myself a question.
provided that I use a fem sporadically, what is the correct strategy to be able to analyze a single component of a set without having all the assemblies? ? ?
I'll explain.
Let's pretend that it has the component a (connected to the ground with any constraints) while the load acts on another component b placed in the distance from a; how can I do to study an analysis on if this is not loaded?
someone will say, do some calculations in terms of forces and moments and proceed (I agree) but if you do not want to do so i.e. if I know the loads and distances on b, I can somehow create something fictitious b that once loaded gives me results on a? ?
I don't know if I was clear.
Thank you for your attention!
good continuation of the day!