size objects

[luigi9555]

with the 2011 version of vectorworks, when I need to resize the objects and it is groups, if I do not dissect all the elements (command+u), I get an absurd result.
What comes out is the first group again, but with the broken elements and distributed in space so I don't explain.
to overcome this problem, as I said before, I have to "group" everything (even the subgroups possibly present) with the remarkable problems of the case.
I don't understand if I'm wrong, and in this version there's some new command, or it's a program error.

Thank you!

 

[lory.b]

Actually, I scale correctly, either by grasping the group with the pointer and by climbing "hand", or by the scale objects command. is there no symbol within your group? These are not scalable, so, if present in the group, they can give the result you see.
I do.

 

[luigi9555]

magic.
the same group I was talking about and that gives me the problem, copying it on a new test file, it works great and scales perfectly.
No, there's no symbol inside, I've already made sure.

Thank you very much. I'll make a point. maybe they are just some files from other versions that give this problem. If I find out anything, I'll let him know.

 

[lory.b]

magic.
the same group I was talking about and that gives me the problem, copying it on a new test file, it works great and scales perfectly.

cover it and then paste into the middle of the sheet or paste it with the glue (paste in place)?
I ask you because I suspect it might be a problem due to the distance from origin.
the design that contains your group how far from the origin 0;0?
It is very important to be always close to the origin, otherwise strange things can happen.
I do.

 

[luigi9555]

cover it and then paste into the middle of the sheet or paste it with the glue (paste in place)?
I ask you because I suspect it might be a problem due to the distance from origin.
the design that contains your group how far from the origin 0;0?
It is very important to be always close to the origin, otherwise strange things can happen.
I do.

I did the test again, and this time I glued it back. You're right. with the simple glue it's okay, with the "paste in place" instead it goes without an apparent sense.
The strange fact is that the distance from the origin (the difference in position in the two gluing cases) is a few meters, a thirty working at 100.
It happened to me in the past to have problems working for example on files from georeferential cartography, with objects distant light years from the initial coordinates, which force the program to complicate the calculations for each vector, but I think that's not the case.
However, I thank you for your concern, among other things with very clever assumptions.
I leave the problem in the "unresolved cases without vital importance" sector and finish the tables.

 

[lory.b]

Don't trust me. .
you have the access rulers I imagine, so you can see the distance from 0;0.
you should search for the command set origin/set origin (I assume you are using the ita version) and select the option at the center of the design. see if the rulers give you other coordinates after giving theok.
that of the origin that translates is a known problem, which also causes other discomforts, for that I return to us. but this is the last thing I ask you, I promise!
I do.

 

[luigi9555]

<quella altri="" anche="" causa="" che="" ci="" dell'origine="" fastidi,="" noto,="" per="" problema="" quello="" ritorno="" su.="" trasla="" un="" è="">I've noticed it again, and even more annoying for me is when entities move according to the z axis where it really becomes apathetic to work.
In these cases I reconstruct the file by creating a new one and usually so I can get the recognition of the origins and for example to make plan 0 really be 0 and not where he says on the ruler.
I had already tried to set the origin, but I hadn't solved it either.
Luckily this is a simple file and only in 2d.

<ma che="" chiedo,="" cosa="" l'ultima="" promesso!="" questa="" ti="" è="">Are you kidding me? Your advice is predictions and your level of preparation and knowledge of the program is evident.
On the contrary, I thank you for the attention you show.</ma></quella>