solid modeling or surfaces? ? ?

[maxopus]

it will be better but, so not the mountains:biggrin:

 

[Poly]

better in both modeling and bending continuity.

it will be better but, so not the mountains:biggrin:

??? illuminami please! non essere criptico!!

 

[maxopus]

better in both modeling and bending continuity.



? ? enlighten me please! do not be cryptic!!

look well the original, at the 2 holes there are two seats for fixing.
if in that area you get "sweetly", the screw or rivet do not support correctly.
the conceptually correct modeling, is that placed by mariuss.

 

[Poly]

? ? See #9 and #10 thread messages. In #9 I did it as you say. in the #10 the new image and quotas make it come out as I did now. Then I said the odds look weird. if then mtbnicola is not particularly clear in asking for what it needs... I don't know what to do with it. I still enjoyed doing it and comparing myself with you.:biggrin: now if my final interpretation was correct, I would like to see it done with the surfaces because of surfaces I don't know a patch:tongue:

 

[sampom]

it will be better but, so not the mountains:biggrin:

look well the original, at the 2 holes there are two seats for fixing.
if in that area you get "sweetly", the screw or rivet do not support correctly.
the conceptually correct modeling, is that placed by mariuss.

hi max..
forgive if I contradict you smile but maybe you have not seen/read well. you are talking about a collar/braccialetto mesh, there is nothing to mount neither screws or rivets (?) to insert, only "chained" mesh. therefore just that the edge of the holes is sweet and connected with continuity.
in the original photo there are no "sedi" or backdrops for fixings, it is only an effect of reflection and light, and in this sense the model of mariuss is not correct; It must be an object of jewelry, style, and those holes so ribord would be really ugly.

instead I do the compliments to poly that using only solids is pulling out objects nothing bad and quite real.. that then in the "style" everything can be real (even many burns that are seen around:biggrin.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[maxopus]

? ? See #9 and #10 thread messages. In #9 I did it as you say. in the #10 the new image and quotas make it come out as I did now. Then I said the odds look weird. if then mtbnicola is not particularly clear in asking for what it needs... I don't know what to do with it. I still enjoyed doing it and comparing myself with you.:biggrin: now if my final interpretation was correct, I would like to see it done with the surfaces because of surfaces I don't know a patch:tongue:

hi max..
Forgive me if I contradict you but maybe you haven't seen/read well. you are talking about a collar/braccialetto mesh, there is nothing to mount neither screws or rivets (?) to insert, only "chained" mesh. therefore just that the edge of the holes is sweet and connected with continuity.
in the original photo there are no "sedi" or backdrops for fixings, it is only an effect of reflection and light, and in this sense the model of mariuss is not correct; It must be an object of jewelry, style, and those holes so ribord would be really ugly.

instead I do the compliments to poly that using only solids is pulling out objects nothing bad and quite real.. that then in the "style" everything can be real (even many burns that are seen around:biggrin.

greetings
Marco:smile:

I'm sorry, I lost a message... I didn't think it was an object of jewelry.

 

[mtbnicola]

the mesh in question can become a continuous chain or be used individually.compliments to poly that did a good job and I apologize if I was unclear to ask what I wanted.I put another photo where you see even better how it will be the gold jewelry.

 

[mtbnicola]

I managed to take decent pictures with my digital machine.
These are the sample from which to start with the modeling.

 

[re_solidworks]

hi max..
forgive if I contradict you smile but maybe you have not seen/read well. you are talking about a collar/braccialetto mesh, there is nothing to mount neither screws or rivets (?) to insert, only "chained" mesh. therefore just that the edge of the holes is sweet and connected with continuity.
in the original photo there are no "sedi" or backdrops for fixings, it is only an effect of reflection and light, and in this sense the model of mariuss is not correct; It must be an object of jewelry, style, and those holes so ribord would be really ugly.

instead I do the compliments to poly that using only solids is pulling out objects nothing bad and quite real.. that then in the "style" everything can be real (even many burns that are seen around:biggrin.

greetings
Marco:smile:

He read them all... but has enabled black edges in proe and now, when it is in front of the monitor, it is like a bull to the corridor in front of the red color:biggrin: