solid rhinoplasty working in multibody

[Bobo75]

Good morning I wanted help if possible.
I make two examples:
1) I create plates with welded rings that we purchase, not having various modules that probably do this thing but a basic license (or down there) I create rings, I codifico them (you never know that in a future they will be provided by us and not made by the tertiary ) and I insert them with connection in the part, after which I place them and add them.
in the part these items show me how body1 body2 and so on.
2) I create internal processing cutters and codifices. when I make new details, for certain processing amount the above shaped cutters and subtract them from my piece. also here in the subtraction operation appears body1...2 etc with under "solido1", "solido2" etc etc.
There is a way to ensure that instead of "body1" or "solido1" I appear instead the code (product name) of the file to which the aforementioned body is tied.
so that at an immediate glance you can know which frieze was used for a certain operation or which ring was welded, without having to open the connected solid in another window?
I hope someone can help me, because it would simplify things a lot.
even if catia is accusing me that simplification is not that it is in its dna...

 

[mcbramby]

but so burn it... I'd say give you the name to the body you want, right-click and write the name, if the body already has the right name, already put by you on the original, when Copi should keep the name......... or did I misunderstand? ?

 

[Bobo75]

hello mc, thanks for the answer.
In practice I solved how you said you rename the body in the element to copy. I hoped that I would automatically update what I had already copied, but unfortunately I was forced to reimport it and replace it in the Boolean operation.
as a practice is rather slender and slightly "parametric" for my tastes but at least I solved.
Thank you very much

 

[mcbramby]

I don't know how the pieces will be mounted, I think I understand welded......
otherwise you can use the product to assemble the parts and you don't need anything the file that appears in the product is what you are using............
But if you care how you did with a paste copy with a link, you just have to remember that you have already given the name a priori to the file ....... then maybe someone also has the solution to keep the name bond......
Be careful with links , xché long go then you don't understand anything anymore and you will find files you thought ok modified ................ I don't use it, but I don't make text there are people who are perhaps more experienced than I use it daily.

 

[mcbramby]

If you can't use a 100% program, because you haven't done courses or you haven't used it for years, it's not a dna speech, I find a very silly cad3d, but because I only use caia v5, I don't think about how to do one thing and that's enough, it's obvious that if you're used to doing something in a way that's not the same. It's just that you don't know how to use it properly and you struggle to get to the solution or wrong procedure and then you find yourself in a dead place or have to do something................. catia v5 is not a videogame, it is a professional program with its rules if you fit and know it you put little to shape, assemble, make drawing.....
It is not a polemical message, it is only x clarity, and it is not x defend catia v5 that absolutely does not need me x defend itself

 

[Bobo75]

I am absolutely aware that the problem is attributable to me.
or at least my poor experience with this program, as well as the total lack of a training course on the same.
As I have already written in my other interventions I think it is excessive for the use that was to be done here, it does amazing things, but in my opinion it has some gaps (often they are "real games") but that could also be implemented in a cad of this level integrating them in the basic version obviously not in expensive additional packages. . .
the ferrari is a beautiful car we would miss, but you run on the track you don't do the rallies in the mountains, to make an example of what I mean...
the 2021 should be the year of the turn from the point of view of the cad, hopefully it is true.
If you do not change it (which I think is unlikely to see the present historian) at least with a course as you must.

 

[mcbramby]