specifications/supply tables

[Sirio77]

good morning to all and thank you in advance for your interest.
I have been following the forum for a long time as "guest" but it is time to ask for your help.
has been entrusted to a customer, an important contract concerning the supply of aluminium fans that provide tig and mig welding. drawings are owned by the customer but we are in the process of analysis to verify/predict requirements that are feasible according to our process. do the fans in question have particular profiles that result in uncomposed joints and however not comparable to uni en iso norms (e.g. drawing is required and disputed the iso 10042 group c) have any of you ever faced a similar topic? you would like to generate a capitulate/specific that binds both parties with activable requests and adhere to the process itself.
I thank you in advance and remain available for any further study.

 

[meccanicamg]

normally or the customer draws the wps or does the carpenter and makes them sign to the customer. in the absence we must proceed in accordance with the rules in force.

 

[Sirio77]

thank you for confirming @meccanicamg. in fact we are proceeding in that sense.
drafting the wps I think is fundamental as well as being the first of the documents to be shared between customer/supplier. I said this I wanted to draw up a sort of capitulate (more stringent between the parts) where for example to fix the various faults (with criteria of acceptability) for the components received in sub-supply. Would you recommend something like that? or have you already faced such a situation?
thanks in advance in
l.s.

 

[meccanicamg]

thank you for confirming @meccanicamg. in fact we are proceeding in that sense.
drafting the wps I think is fundamental as well as being the first of the documents to be shared between customer/supplier. I said this I wanted to draw up a sort of capitulate (more stringent between the parts) where for example to fix the various faults (with criteria of acceptability) for the components received in sub-supply. Would you recommend something like that? or have you already faced such a situation?
thanks in advance in
l.s.

I've been able to write the wps a few times, and by the way, using very old wagon builders.
are things to do with a specialist.

 

[Sirio77]

thank you for your feedback, actually at the level of wps I have no particular problems, indeed I would say that it is part of my background, more than anything else I would miss the part relative to the criteria of acceptability (see for example the capitulates fiat etc) you have seen someone?

 

[meccanicamg]

thank you for your feedback, actually at the level of wps I have no particular problems, indeed I would say that it is part of my background, more than anything else I would miss the part relative to the criteria of acceptability (see for example the capitulates fiat etc) you have seen someone?

I normally have to deal with demanding customers for the supply of plants but regarding carpentry specifications do not come down in detail if not someone who wants non destructive controls, sandblasting and replenishment, weld grinding and elimination of edges.
I recently had to build a supporting structure in india with tubulars that in Europe are located but they...no and therefore the alternatives were to fold sheet or to compose 4 sheets to make tubular....so wps with cyanfrines and welding technique and control.
From this point of view acceptability is easy compared to other aspects of automation, mechanical choices of transmissions and other things.

 

[Sirio77]

clear
What to say thank you for getting the match. here in my opinion it is more a discussion of "shortworm" in the sense that they have already been realized of the prototypes with non-definite process that (though with many pieces) have largely exceeded the preventive cycles of stress tests... only after passing such tests.. . seems to have become fundamental the aesthetic aspect....
Thank you again!
l.s.