steel u100wc

[rory_the_king]

Hello everyone:
this is a steel for cold working tools (cold printing);
Can anyone tell me the designation to which this acronym belongs?
percentages elements that make it?
equivalents with din, American legislation and others, if possible?
Thank you.
Lorenzo

 

[Lucky66]

The only steelwork that spells the materials with u is the woodwork, but that acronym you indicated doesn't exist, where did you get it? ?

 

[rory_the_king]

should be a k followed by a number (brand vew) but don't ask me what it is!
the particular is a thickness for sliding punch

 

[rory_the_king]

I think it is the designation of one!
in the site of the uni there is written:
uni 4133:1958 forging tools (cutters), but the norm has been withdrawn and has not been replaced! ! !
Does anyone know anything about this steel?

 

[rory_the_king]

the one 4134: 1958 forging tools (punzoni) was withdrawn!

 

[numero1]

on the internet I found it here:http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...cd=3&hl=it&ct=clnk&gl=it&source=www.google.itacciai per lavorazioni a freddo:
ux 200 c 13 - ux 150 cd 12 - u 52 wc 20 - u 40 wc 20 - u 115 w - u 100 wc -u 58 mv 8 - u 100 cm 4

Is that him?
you have to scroll a little to find it....
Hi.

 

[meccanicamg]

Hello everyone:
this is a steel for cold working tools (cold printing);
Can anyone tell me the designation to which this acronym belongs?
percentages elements that make it?
equivalents with din, American legislation and others, if possible?
Thank you.
Lorenzo

Hi, I give you my interpretation from a 1963 tech book, seen and considered that this is a legislation of a few decades ago.
u100wc u = tool
100 = percentage of c = 1% minimum
w = wolframium less than 0.1% (multiplier 10)
c = less than 0.25% chromium (multiplier 4)

It should be an old norm that no longer exists since it is not found anywhere so indicated. I was unable to find a comparison of chemical composition that allows me to replace it with a new production steel.

probably was replaced with steel uni 95mnwcr5ku din 100mncrw4 having w-n° 1.2510 even if having superior characteristics.

for more information about the material, send mail to the unsider. even if they are registered and you are not customers have always answered and sent when necessary also photocopies of the materials cards.

 

[meccanicamg]

other steel approaching but does not have the same percentages is the 1.2516 currently used for punches and is a wolframio uni 100w4ku bar. But we are always in doubt.

send an email to the unsider and post the answer they give you. so we get every doubt. Unfortunately, there is little to do about these early-war designations. and materials are very evolving.

 

[rory_the_king]

Let's put a bit of order otherwise I make a beastly confusion:
the designation you use is

- u100wc (old uni)

- one 95mnwcr5ku (2955?, en 10027? )

- din 100mncrw4

1.2516? Werkstoff? ? ?

- Hello? ?

- Vew k??? should be English

Do you find yourself or is it wrong?
Hello and thank you
Lorenzo

 

[rory_the_king]

I wrote to unsider!
We hope they answer!
Thank you.
Hi.
Lorenzo

 

[meccanicamg]

Let's put a bit of order otherwise I make a beastly confusion:
the designation you use is

- u100wc (old uni)

- one 95mnwcr5ku (2955?, en 10027? )

- din 100mncrw4

1.2516? Werkstoff? ? ?

- Hello? ?

- Vew k??? should be English

Do you find yourself or is it wrong?
Hello and thank you
Lorenzo

you mixed two different materials!! However, we look forward to the steel unification body which will clarify this. there are too many different steels in circulation as characteristics and as nomenclatures.

 

[rory_the_king]

k460 (vew) - 100mncrw4 (din) - 1.2510 (werkstoff); I miss the one and the help; told by you the aun would be 95mnwcr5ku (old u100wc)


100w4ku - 1.2516; should it be k (vew)? Din?

Do you agree?
waiting for answer from unsider obviously!

ps: do there exist in some site or in literature the equivalences between the various regulations for a same steel?

 

[meccanicamg]

k460 (vew) - 100mncrw4 (din) - 1.2510 (werkstoff); I miss the one and the help; told by you the aun would be 95mnwcr5ku (old u100wc)


100w4ku - 1.2516; should it be k (vew)? Din?

Do you agree?
waiting for answer from unsider obviously!

ps: do there exist in some site or in literature the equivalences between the various regulations for a same steel?

So we're... But it is a guess. only the unsider can give us exactly the chronostory of the materials if they still exist.

if you are looking with google you can find the equivalents in the steel sheets of the manufacturers (in pdf or web).


the k460 (vew ... Indian/Chinese) has the following composition:
c = 0.95%
mn = 1.0%
cr = 0.5%
w = 0.6%
v = 0.1%

the 1.2510 Said 100mncrw4 according to din and en standards (number and literal) has the following composition:
c = 0.95%
mn = 1.1%
cr = 0.6 %
w = 0.6 %
v = 0.1%

the 95mnwcr5ku according to one has the following composition:
c = 0.9%
mn = 1.35%
cr = 0.5%
= 0.35%
w = 0.5%

the The-1 (aisi/sae) has the following composition:
c = 0.95%
mn = 1.25%
cr = 0.5%
w = 0.5%
v = 0.2%