structural verification of accelerations

[lucignolo_one]

provided that my experience with finite elements is very reduced, I have been subjected to the problem of evaluating the resistance of a component (which I have not yet been specified but could be a perm feed silos) subjected to different accelerations in the 3 directions (x,y,z) which are to be studied individually and independently one from the other.

In particular, the question I ask you is as follows:

Is it a task that a neophyte with a little commitment can come to solve, or the type of study requires skills that cannot be compensated in the short time I have available (less than a month considering also that I must continue to carry out the work of "routines")?

demand n.2: having used the pro/engineer for a structural calculation on a frame in which it acted on a limited region a force known in order to assess its resistance and deformation. ...can this analysis use pro/e again or do you need a specific software?if you which?

Thank you.

 

[lucignolo_one]

una imbeccatina?

 

[Zaxxon]

Hi.
we all would also like to help you, but the calculation programs are not so immediate as the word in which four rows at the least worse you can write them (and cmq also want to use it well you need a lot of practice). in the calculation you need to model/semplify, meshare, bind, apply loads, evaluate results and propose verified solutions. . I don't feel like telling anyone that this is a simple task. I would help someone who knows "something", if not paper/pennary/normous/manual engineer.

♪

 

[lucignolo_one]

Hi.
we all would also like to help you, but the calculation programs are not so immediate as the word in which four rows at the least worse you can write them (and cmq also want to use it well you need a lot of practice). in the calculation you need to model/semplify, meshare, bind, apply loads, evaluate results and propose verified solutions. . I don't feel like telling anyone that this is a simple task. I would help someone who knows "something", if not paper/pennary/normous/manual engineer.

♪

Hi.
In view of the nature of the answer, I would say that, by simplifying the first question I put, we can answer <<no,non ce="" fare!!="" la="" puoi="">> :tongue:

Indi for which the answer to the second question is less.


I am not a designer in the true and narrow sense of the word.dedicating to these things would go beyond my role but if it had been something that, although with a certain commitment, you could arrive then I would have done it....but if as you say it is necessary knowledge, experience and practical experience then it does not for me....at least for now.

Thank you.</no,non>