tangency connection surface with a "regatta" (nx2206)

[alexfunk]

good morning, as from title I have to connect 2 surfaces with a "rigate": from the edge of the red surface (out of tangency) to the green surface (which will not be on the edge but inside the surface). the "department" of the superfice must be tangent to the purple one thanks alessandro

 

[alexfunk]

hi, i haven't installed version 2206 yet, could you post the step or parasolid for the 2007 version?
thank you.

hello, inside the zip there is a step and an iges

 

[ceschi1959]

good morning, as from title I have to connect 2 surfaces with a "rigate": from the edge of the red surface (out of tangency) to the green surface (which will not be on the edge but inside the surface). the "department" of the superfice must be tangent to the purple one thanks alessandro

ciao @ alexfunk ,
'surface lined or simply lined, surface obtained as a union of simple infinity of straights, each of which is called the generation of the line . a curve contained in a line is called the director if it is cut in one point by each generator'
in nx is called "recognized" and you can only build it between two sections without imposing any constraint (tangence or curvature). with the bridge surface command you can make a tangent surface at the first edge and tangent at any point of the second. see image. If you could be a little clearer. .
c.

 

[alexfunk]

ciao _I called the surface lined to indicate that it had to be "rectline"
I tried to use the command "section surface" but the result for me is not acceptable because in the final part of the red surface there is no tangence (photo)
I was advised to stretch the red sup slightly so that I could have the tangency until the end. I will do the day of the tests and I will post the result

thanks alessandro

 

[ceschi1959]

ciao @ alexfunk I think you're following the wrong path. I don't know what the constraints you have in doing that surface, but you'll never succeed if you don't change anything. purple surface is not congruent with tangency conditions and section surface are not suitable for doing what you need. excuse the question: how long do you use the software?
c.

 

[flaviobrio88]

So he could go?

 

[alexfunk]

ciao _I may have misunderstood what I wanted to accomplish and so I understand your perplexity
using the above command (extending the surface) the final result is the desired one (all perfectly in tangency)
@flaviobrio88, I also wanted to look at your solution (to understand the command used) but the step
it turns out "empty" (also with catia)

thanks alessandro

 

[ceschi1959]

ciao @ alexfunk can you post your solution in step if you can?

 

[alexfunk]

ciao @ alexfunk can you post your solution in step if you can?

ciao _ Annex
alessandro

 

[ceschi1959]

ciao _I may have misunderstood what I wanted to accomplish and so I understand your perplexity
using the above command (extending the surface) the final result is the desired one (all perfectly in tangenza)

As I expected... I'm sorry if I'm impietous, it doesn't seem like tangency.

 

[alexfunk]

prova with superfice questa

 

[ceschi1959]

test with this surface

I feel worse than the other.
you must change strategy, if you dare not change the starting surfaces (which do ca@re) do not come out. Open surfaces, pointless patch...

 

[alexfunk]

ok va bene!