test raccordo!!!!

[monster]

hello guys I place a step

I want you to connect the contact point of the two faces with radius 5mm

as if I had a ball running around the solid!!!!!

test valid for all software

 

[garide]

Hi.

possible results can be 2

allego images:

00 is obtained by tapping the sitema, the 01 is obtained by sequentially fitting command on the various edges

 

[Prof.]

What do you expect and what would you like to get? in pro-and you do enough simply but I would like to understand if you have special needs.
Bye.

 

[Mauri:66]

What do you expect and what would you like to get? in pro-and you do enough simply but I would like to understand if you have special needs.
Bye.

We await the answer

 

[monster]

What do you expect and what would you like to get?

I want to get what you find in figure 00....:smile:

 

[monster]

00 is obtained by tapping the sitema, the 01 is obtained by sequentially fitting command on the various edges

I had no doubt what to do 00 you had to deceive the system and how?

...where he does that skifo of 01

 

[Mauri:66]

with proe wf4 you create it without deception by selecting the four edges, simply using the option "crea rash":smile:

Hi.

 

[maxopus]

do not joke children :biggrin: , as you have been told, in pro/e selections the 4 edges (see image) and apply the command.
allego step.

 

[MBT]

Could you put black edges??? Otherwise you do not see well!

 

[garide]

I had no doubt what to do 00 you had to deceive the system and how?

I'm sorry I'm late but I've been around...

to get 00 you have to do this:

- Do 0.001 radii on the edges where you want the system to roll the edge.

- creates radius 5 on the contact edge between the two parallelepipeds


practically the system feels the radius from "0.001" on the edge and will not make you the extension of the side of the parallelepiped, but will collect the radius from "0.001" with the plan creating the winding.

Everything here

Hi.

 

[monster]

I know how you did...... you can't just be the magician:biggrin:

only that I got fleas in my ear that there are cad systems that do these things here automatically...I always stay with a little doubt

thanks garide for the attention:finger:

 

[Dylan]

I'm sorry they didn't intervene with softuerons like catia,sw..
For monster, do you think the example you posted isn't "easy" between difficult cases?

I'll explain.

if in place of rows and straight lines there were non-functional geometries such as cylinders, cones etc but faces like nurbs etc? We messed up even more? ? ?

dylan

 

[monster]

Well, for the other softuers, I don't know. Surely my example is a threatening plague to handle!

the answer to the nurbs or surfaces absolutely nothing changes everything depends on how much you work with a cad system and for those like me who did in reverse know how to affon the fittings even with the most desperate geometries ... only that I realized that our system likes more if you feed the solids that the surfaces of the type that works best... I at first used the and as if I had the old stomach. ..when he gave me the results then I discovered also a lot of tricks to perfectly throw everything...

bye bye

 

[Dylan]

with the most desperate geometries

Very beautiful. Have you ever seen the geometries/superfici that writes rhino? and those of omnicad? The desperation is at home)

dylan

 

[flaviobrio88]

Very beautiful. Have you ever seen the geometries/superfici that writes rhino? and those of omnicad? The desperation is at home)

dylan

Perhaps you are confused also because with omnicad you can build surfaces from g1 g2 g3 and g4 and I think that you with cim get to the max in g1 (at least the last time I saw toptron did not come to build surfaces besides g1 -tangence- now I don't know)

 

[flaviobrio88]

Very beautiful. Have you ever seen the geometries/superfici that writes rhino? and those of omnicad? The desperation is at home)

dylan

if there is a tool that can show you the curvatures of the surfaces (not to be confused with the zebra) try to make a connection with the fillet function and see if you can follow the course of the surfaces and not only respect the tangency

 

[Dylan]

Bye, then let's put it that way.

all the mathematicians that I have seen built (or even only modified and then exported) with sw suscritti were of pitiful quality. But be careful. It's also likely that people who did those jobs didn't know how to work with those systems. (of course I don't believe it..).

combination of all the mathematicians that I have seen built with other sw (and I did not force insert peaks..) are unexceptionable. or are the operators all magicians? (of course I don't believe it..).


a few years ago I heard that they wanted to implement in the tops of the functionalities suitable for modeling style surfaces (I remember the analysis of the flexes etc) maybe not to the icemsurf but something they wanted to do... ...and then they did nothing to solve the problem at the root.

cq thanks to your opinion about omnicad... I only tell you that the last work I did designed with omnicad holes I say the holes were not functional surfaces written as cylinders but nurbs... the edges of the shredded surf as a child would do with paper and scissors. . .

dylan

 

[monster]

Ohhh quiet flavio.. .I don't think anyone can care about the tangence of surfaces in this case, maybe dylan cited those programs because maybe in their environment do the things done well in conversions a little less everything is to see how you set the program....cmq also toptron has commands for the tangences

Look how long ago my friend made me a mathematical model with delcam

from cloud of points to the end I found myself with mathematicians from gross other than surfaces in class "a"

 

[flaviobrio88]

Ohhh quiet flavio.. .I don't think anyone can care about the tangence of surfaces in this case, maybe dylan cited those programs because maybe in their environment do the things done well in conversions a little less everything is to see how you set the program....cmq also toptron has commands for the tangences

Look how long ago my friend made me a mathematical model with delcam

from cloud of points to the end I found myself with mathematicians from gross other than surfaces in class "a"

Perhaps I didn't explain myself well I just said that maybe before judging something you would do well to look at what you have , and as I imagined dylan it confirmed that toptron for now does not have the class surfaces to while omnicad itself (the tangency does not hit anything).

 

[flaviobrio88]

ot:

Bye, then let's put it that way.

all the mathematicians that I have seen built (or even only modified and then exported) with sw suscritti were of pitiful quality. But be careful. It's also likely that people who did those jobs didn't know how to work with those systems. (of course I don't believe it..).



combination of all the mathematicians that I have seen built with other sw (and I did not force insert peaks..) are unexceptionable. or are the operators all magicians? (of course I don't believe it..).


a few years ago I heard that they wanted to implement in the tops of the functionalities suitable for modeling style surfaces (I remember the analysis of the flexes etc) maybe not to the icemsurf but something they wanted to do... ...and then they did nothing to solve the problem at the root.

cq thanks to your opinion about omnicad... I only tell you that the last work I did designed with omnicad holes I say the holes were not functional surfaces written as cylinders but nurbs... the edges of the shredded surf as a child would do with paper and scissors. . .

dylan

I'm sorry that you had such negative experiences that you believe it or not I can assure you that as a superficial modeler we have nothing to envy to anyone starting from rhino to get to alias

With regard to deformers (I believe that in modified you refer to deformed ) I can assure you that some design studies that do not need presentation and where they use alias also use with great satisfaction our software.

I'm here.