gfrank
Guest
the Court of Cassation, annulling an appeal that recognized faulty both the director of the work and the director of the yard (who works on behalf of the contractor), indicated that d.l. is not responsible for accidents caused by the failure to comply with the safety rules
c.d.c. has specified that the responsibility of d.l. ( and of the contractor) to third parties exists if it proves that the malicious event was committed by the contractor on order and indication of the director of the works or another representative of the contractor.
c.d.c. has specified that the responsibility of d.l. ( and of the contractor) to third parties exists if it proves that the malicious event was committed by the contractor on order and indication of the director of the works or another representative of the contractor.