tolerance analysis extension...cosa doesn't think?

[Rael84]

Hey, guys.
I got to take a look at the utility tolerance analysis extension. What do you think? to me it does not seem very useful, as the analysis can be carried out only in 1d and at that point it is better to do it autonomously by viewing the masses at the table, more clear and precise. then as regards statistical analysis it is possible to make it with software of statistics such as minitab or even with matlab. thanks x the opinions

 

[zimmy]

the tax form, according to me, is simple, economical and very effective.Yes, it's only 1d control. but how many times do you need to check in 3d? in case you buy the sw "father" that is the sigmetrix 6sigma (and then tell me how much it costs!).

carry out a statistical control. you can't do it on the drawing board. the tax automatically suggests which odds should be selected.
if you want you can selectnche le features di annotation and not only the parametric quotas of proes.

It takes account of linear tolerances, table, position and profile.

You can change dynamically tolerances on selected quotas to check in real time statistical examination, average and standard deviation examination worst case, defects per million, Statistical contribution of individual quotas, sensitivity analysis for single quota, polarization configurable in the perno-hole coupling. report in html.
all dynamically while changing the various values.

perfectly integrato in proe. If you change a tolerance in the tax environment, and if you accept it, this change is automatically reported in the proe quota.
in wf5 also :change of the nominal value of the quotas, creation of virtual components and/or not present together (films, deposits, ...) , compatibility with bmx ... and more.
How do you do these things in drawing? What visually controls the drawing?other products ? yes, but are not integrated .
and the tax module really costs very little.

 

[zpaolo]

effettua un statistical control. you can't do it on the drawing board. the tax automatically suggests which odds should be selected.

This is definitely the most convenient thing, doing a study of tolerance with linear sum is already a mess from the drawing, I usually do a statistical study with excel to choose tolerances and thicknesses (ceramic substrates and micromechanical parts), and being able to do it directly in pro|e is a big advantage. especially when someone back asks for lumens on the final tolerance of a dimension that is the sum of three or four dimensions:

Palo

 

[Rael84]

the tax form, according to me, is simple, economical and very effective.Yes, it's only 1d control. but how many times do you need to check in 3d? in case you buy the sw "father" that is the sigmetrix 6sigma (and then tell me how much it costs!).

carry out a statistical control. you can't do it on the drawing board. the tax automatically suggests which odds should be selected.
if you want you can selectnche le features di annotation and not only the parametric quotas of proes.

It takes account of linear tolerances, table, position and profile.

You can change dynamically tolerances on selected quotas to check in real time statistical examination, average and standard deviation examination worst case, defects per million, Statistical contribution of individual quotas, sensitivity analysis for single quota, polarization configurable in the perno-hole coupling. report in html.
all dynamically while changing the various values.

perfectly integrato in proe. If you change a tolerance in the tax environment, and if you accept it, this change is automatically reported in the proe quota.
in wf5 also :change of the nominal value of the quotas, creation of virtual components and/or not present together (films, deposits, ...) , compatibility with bmx ... and more.
How do you do these things in drawing? What visually controls the drawing?other products ? yes, but are not integrated .
and the tax module really costs very little.

In fact, sometimes it is necessary to do a 3d analysis of some chains and I think that if a sw succeeds in doing such an analysis would be much more useful, because, I repeat, in my opinion for the analysis of the linear chains it is easier to use the masses in the table with its quotas and tolerances. With regard to statistical analysis, it can be easily performed with other software, even very trivial. I agree with you about the real-time modification of tolerances: this is very convenient when you have the need to check how the various quotas and tolerances affect the final result. thank you for your opinions!