uni vs d.m.

[mir]

Hi.
who wins in a direct confrontation norms uni versus d.m.

example:

uni 9165:2020​

orMinisterial Decree 01/02/86 (and updates)grazie
mir

 

[New Rider]

Hi.
who wins in a direct confrontation norms uni versus d.m.

example:

uni 9165:2020​

orMinisterial Decree 01/02/86 (and updates)razie
die

Hi.

wins the ministerial decree which usually postpones, for its correct application, to the rule of art that most times is understood as standardization.
The dm-86 is repealed.

Hi.

 

[mir]

Thank you!
I know that the dm was repealed... but where do I find that he was repealed and/or replaced?

 

[mir]

that then should be replaced by

https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/at...diceredazionale=08a02872&elenco30giorni=false

 

[New Rider]

Are we talking about the same decree?
dm 01/02/86 is a decree of the Ministry of the Interior concerning fire planning in the garages.

 

[mir]

Forgive me I was wrong with the copy and paste...

I was comparing

decree 17 April 2008 ​

technical rule for design, construction, testing, operation and surveillance of works and natural gas transport plants with density not exceeding 0.8.

with the

uni 9165:2020​

 

[New Rider]

Ministerial decrees usually tell you what to do while the rules one tell you how to do it.
eye that decree 17/04/2008 has been updated. on the vvf website find everything that can help you.
I can't understand why you compare a traditional technical rule with a genuine standard. It's two distinct things.

 

[mir]

but the dms (they tell me) actually win on one at the design level as dms are law and if they do not indicate a procedure other than one "win".

excuse but 17/04/2008 how do you find the update ... qui says December 2020 ... will be the last?

Thank you!
♪

 

[New Rider]

but the dms (they tell me) actually win on one at the design level as dms are law and if they do not indicate a procedure other than one "win".

excuse but 17/04/2008 how do you find the update ... qui says December 2020 ... will be the last?

Thank you!
♪

attention to the fields of application of standards and decrees.
one refers to pipelines while the other refers to gas distribution systems.
However, the discourse of dms that win over one is in principle correct.
What is your doubt? Where do you have to apply these things to her?
However, what you linked is the last text coordinated by vvf.

 

[mir]

thanks new rider.
I am studying the method of testing a natural gas line with pressure above 2.4 mpa.

 

[New Rider]

thanks new rider.
I am studying the method of testing a natural gas line with pressure above 2.4 mpa.

then if you have to evaluate the testing methods of a gnl line you have to lean on the rules one. when the line becomes subject to vvf the fire technician will use dm 17/04/08. If you go to read the dm 17/04/08 at point 1.4 '', test the distribution systems after installation in operation, in order to ensure proper realization and ensure proper safety, they must be submitted to the tests indicated by the norm uni 9165 for distribution networks and a 9860 for the user derivation plants. '

 

[mir]

certain but the paragraphIf by chance one was different I should still use the dm....

I'm confused with this sort of reunion of information... not you?

 

[New Rider]

redundancy is typical in these cases.
For example: in the water supply networks for the design of these networks the uni 10779 is used in which the project parameters are reported (pressure flow according to the risk). Once this value is determined through one you go through the technical rules vf if these parameters are sufficient or if you need to correct them.
I see it so at this point dm 17/04/2008 + integrations with uni9165