use of skype among forum users

[graziano-g]

Hi.

I certainly did not invented hot water and much less hard eggs, however it would be useful if to discuss certain problems and related solutions you could feel on skype, without commitment and unpretentious, two lines of demand then if you find availability maybe in voice / conference or video conference maybe with the shared desktop... .

I think it might be a great help for everyone, even the most idiot can be a genius....

Bye.

 

[cacciatorino]

Hi.

I certainly did not invented hot water and much less hard eggs, however it would be useful if to discuss certain problems and related solutions you could feel on skype, without commitment and unpretentious, two lines of demand then if you find availability maybe in voice / conference or video conference maybe with the shared desktop... .

I think it might be a great help for everyone, even the most idiot can be a genius....

Bye.

unfortunately your idea has a serious problem, which I think makes it not preferable: the forum function is to create, over the years, an archive of questions and answers, to which users can access with the "search" function. if questions and answers pass through other channels (skype, phone, email, etc) this archive cannot be created. If a user needs an immediate response I think he doesn't have any other way to do a service contract with the software provider.

 

[marcof]

(cut)
if to discuss certain problems and related solutions you could feel on skype
(cut)
I think it might be great help for all, even the most idiot can be a genius.....

I quote in full what has already written you hunter, and I add that the help would not be for everyone but for a few. the exact opposite of what you were proposing to do.

 

[graziano-g]

Hi.

I agree, too, except that as intuited by marcof, causes the rush, lacks an important part of my reasoning that rightly as posted does not reach the goal or better says the opposite of what I think.

In my opinion, most of the forums on which we are discussing and discussing technical issues have a major gap: the extremely dilated times, there was once the west in comparison is a short.....

It seems instead that the world's largest toilet paper roll, the book of faces, does not have this gap, and here I stop.

I'll explain myself better even if I think there's no need to take anything for granted.

happen, indeed I am sure, that who has and places a problem to everyone's attention would like to have the solution two seconds before posting it on the forum and probably happens that there may be someone who randomly is viewing that page or who receives in real time the warning of the topic just inserted.

Perhaps you want to answer because you have already dealt with the problem or you have time and desire to try and try, great the spirit of the forum!

certainly the solution if you do not already need some proof or maybe you need more information to understand the problem then find the solution by reproducing the precise situation who asks.

then an intercalare of mail here, as you are put there, which version you have of there etc.. .

In the case, not entirely unlikely there is question and offer in real time but even if the thing should be deferred according to the times I think that the ingenuity, intelligence and technology exploited for what it is and must be combined together to be of great help.

So here is the spirit of my hot water and hard eggs:

problem, question, offer, discussion in private (between those who have time and desire and not obligatory for all subjects, a bit to feeling or pulling of those who want to be understood ), solution, answer to the post of public domain therefore available to all.

therefore in parallel formation of synergies that can only do well for the good of all.


My great help for all is therefore to be understood according to the good will to post the solution to the problem, as it is right that it is in the spirit of the forum, after having discussed with who is available, certainly not to keep everything for itself..

so the thing should be seen opening a little more the mind.

in the case last night I had a small problem, I contacted a user who made available on skype, we found the solution and shortly ago I posted it to benefit everyone.

I think this is a great way to interpret the forum, the 2.0 way

What do you say?

hello and thanks for the attention.

n.b.

No offense to anyone.

 

[marcof]

problem, question, offer, discussion in private (between those who have time and desire and not obligatory for all subjects, a bit to feeling or pulling of those who want to be understood ), solution, answer to the post of public domain therefore available to all.
therefore in parallel formation of synergies that can only do well for the good of all.

It could certainly work as it did to you last night. my impression is that you would lose all the discussion before solution that could be of stimulus to other users to better deepen the topic, propose alternative solutions or find a faster solution than the first two users connected on skype had not come to mind.
hypothesizes that the method would take place then the forum would resemble more to a page of the faqs of the various topics discussed.

 

[graziano-g]

Hi.

alternative solutions however can always be made known by anyone, naturally and naturally after as in normality.

regarding the part of the antecedent discussion...... I normally see that in most cases only unnecessary premages are read, as already described, because only a few interventions are focused and useful to the solution.

However, I do not think we lose anything more than it can be right that we lose or better with good will we could read the reasoning that leads to the solution, without dispersions, so that we can have clear the picture of the speech so that we can intervene carefully in case of alternative solutions, always after all, as it is natural that it is.

but this is just my personal consideration.

As for the faq page I have noticed (and are not a phenomenon) that the forums are used mainly for this, see the various users with 1 or 2 interventions then missing in action, when they do not just pose the problem to leave with the solution without thanking. . .

I am convinced that the voice contact, for those who are prepared, can only be useful to those who speak first and to those who read then.

but all this is nothing but: my alibis and your reasons ( rimmel - de gregori) and I am aware that in general they give too much for granted.

and this is only my personal consideration.

However thanks to the exchange of views.

Hi.