Variable Series - Inv 2009

[MBT]

Good morning, everyone.
I did some experiments on some research, but without result.
I use inv 2009 and presented this "problem".
Suppose you want to make a dozen holes.
rightly make the first hole and "respect" others with the command "series", polar or rectangular depending on the case
but this works as long as the pitch between the holes is constant.
What if it's variable??? ?

in practice my problem
I have a flange, with a set of holes arranged in circle on a face.
the passage of these holes is not constant. the first is in axis, the second at 30°, the third at 26° from the second, the fourth at 34° from the third etc etc. etc. etc.
because then to this series of holes I have to follow other processing and then the assembly of compnenti.... you will understand that I bother to do the individual processing. . .

Any ideas?

thanks in advance:finger:

 

[Ilario]

the only one, perhaps, rather than making a series of "series" of work, do in the sketch the hole center points on the circular axis you need and quoti from there, then do everything with a single drilling process.

 

[MBT]

the only one, perhaps, rather than making a series of "series" of work, do in the sketch the hole center points on the circular axis you need and quoti from there, then do everything with a single drilling process.

Actually, that's what I did.
but it goes "good" for the first processing.
the others who are "legated" to this?? ? becomes a disaster!
and then the components that must be mounted using these processing?? ?

 

[diegus]

I think there's no other way to work. as regards, instead, the positioning of the bolting if you use the autodrop automatically recognizes the holes of the same size and asks you if to place the item on all occasions.

 

[Ilario]

Actually, that's what I did.
but it goes "good" for the first processing.
the others who are "legated" to this?? ? becomes a disaster!
and then the components that must be mounted using these processing?? ?

the others that are "lit" in what sense, I don't understand.... give me an example.. .

 

[Peppe]

If there's no mathematical relationship between work, how would you do a series?

 

[davide75]

at the most you do a shared sketch where you put all the holes and then choose which ones to use in the feature hole

 

[ReFazzi]

Hi.
I try to say a cabbage without having made any feedback, and it could be even more complicated, but it could be the point for a different solution.
because you don't make a series with 2nd steps, then you exclude the occasions you don't need... at the bottom are only 180 celebrations.
Don't send me
greetings

 

[MBT]

the others that are "lit" in what sense, I don't understand.... give me an example.. .

image attached.
Sorry, it's "strict" but it's r&d stuff.

in green the holes "primari",
that with the red arrow is a processing that must have the same step as the primary holes.
being a cut of revolution is a nice break to do it "handed" one by one. It would be good to be able to put it in series.

@ peppe.
the relationship is there but it is not constant.
I'll explain.
1st angle hole 0
the following are:
36 - 62 - 118 - 144 - 180 - 216 - 246 - 294 - 324
so the step between them is
36 - 26 - 56 - 26 - 36 - 36 - 30 - 48 - 30 - 36


for assembly... there are no vines in it!!!!:frown:

Hi.
I try to say a cabbage without having made any feedback, and it could be even more complicated, but it could be the point for a different solution.
because you don't make a series with 2nd steps, then you exclude the occasions you don't need... at the bottom are only 180 celebrations.
Don't send me
greetings

But look... I thought about it.
but then the file becomes unmanageable.

 

[Peppe]

Maybe I say a ca***ata but try to make an i-feature consisting of your primary green hole and its red correspondent.... You do a sketch where you put your centers only green holes then you piss the i-feature! !

 

[MBT]

Maybe I say a ca***ata but try to make an i-feature consisting of your primary green hole and its red correspondent.... You do a sketch where you put your centers only green holes then you piss the i-feature! !

It can be an idea.
After I try.

However, it is an idea that is good for making the various work, but for the assembly of the pieces it still touches me to do it "by hand".

in pro-e there was (I think there is still) the possibility to make a series "table" in which the quotas of all the workings of the series are specified.
would be useful such a function.

 

[davide75]

the only then is that you do a shared sketch in which you measure all holes and then decide which to make visible or not.

 

[MBT]

the only then is that you do a shared sketch in which you measure all holes and then decide which to make visible or not.

Yeah, okay.
but the "problem" always remain associated work, which I must "multiplicate" by hand....