Anchorage
Guest
accessible from the site www.acca.it(it was not at all treated the discourse of restructuring and its variants....
)
)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
7kris7
Guest
Yes, seen... more than anything for the curiosity for so long stimulated.
Nothing much.. seemed acerbo. no mention of temporal phases, variants, volumetrics, abachi.. and above all publisher objects. usually show man exercise where everything appears simple. . I'd say he needs more tests.
Nothing much.. seemed acerbo. no mention of temporal phases, variants, volumetrics, abachi.. and above all publisher objects. usually show man exercise where everything appears simple. . I'd say he needs more tests.
Anchorage
Guest
"usual show man exercise"
....I agree:finger:
....I agree:finger:
gfrank
Guest
I agree that the sw must be tried, but:
- abachi : there are all (integration with primus)
- structures/structural: there is everything (integration with edilus)
- stratigraphy : there is everything (integration with termus)
first glance, compared to revit the management of "objects" in the design, it seems easier.
Then naurally, you will have to evaluate the editor of objects (simple/complicated?), evaluate the usual things out of the standard (hard to different thickness, intersections of objects "complicated", etc., but everything seems very good to me.
of course you will have to see how it handles g/r, volumes, etc.
(and the learning curve that you do not yet know) seems to me a more "ductile" tool of revit
the stairs: really good!
the internal and external surfaces of the premises/meals: simple!
material management: remarkable!
I think they made a great product!
- abachi : there are all (integration with primus)
- structures/structural: there is everything (integration with edilus)
- stratigraphy : there is everything (integration with termus)
first glance, compared to revit the management of "objects" in the design, it seems easier.
Then naurally, you will have to evaluate the editor of objects (simple/complicated?), evaluate the usual things out of the standard (hard to different thickness, intersections of objects "complicated", etc., but everything seems very good to me.
of course you will have to see how it handles g/r, volumes, etc.
(and the learning curve that you do not yet know) seems to me a more "ductile" tool of revit
the stairs: really good!
the internal and external surfaces of the premises/meals: simple!
material management: remarkable!
I think they made a great product!
7kris7
Guest
I don't know. It will be that my experience with edilus nn has convinced me too much, but never excites me the excessive simplicity.
revit is undoubtedly a complex software.. but because the results are complex. the management of completely free objects is for me a fundamental point of a bim software, because in my experience workflows 98% are non-standard things, and the remaining 2% standard found in the libraries.
with revit think (or relief) any object and you are sure that you reproduce it the same.. with other tools a little less, ergo if it is to design new residential buildings without particular things goes great, but in the particular case falls the donkey.
revit is undoubtedly a complex software.. but because the results are complex. the management of completely free objects is for me a fundamental point of a bim software, because in my experience workflows 98% are non-standard things, and the remaining 2% standard found in the libraries.
with revit think (or relief) any object and you are sure that you reproduce it the same.. with other tools a little less, ergo if it is to design new residential buildings without particular things goes great, but in the particular case falls the donkey.