volume calculation and other parameters

[fabio.revit]

second (and third) question:
I often have to calculate volumes of irregular subtexts with graphical demonstration to verify the average height according to the volume/area ratio, graphical demonstrations of areas, areoilluminant relationships.
in revit is a delirium, with vw how do you manage these processes? follow any changes?
Thank you.

 

[lory.b]

Bye.
interesting question, complex answer.
to simplify, there is a parametric object in vw, it is called space/space. is a polygon that represents the rooms, to which the specific function is attributed. once designed vw automatically calculates the surface and, specifying the average height, the volume.
the space/space object is already connected to a format record so a table with all the data relating to the individual rooms of a building, from the dimensional ones to the finishes.
If you move walls, the space/room object follows them, then surfaces and volumes are always up to date.
in the Italian version there is also the room object that calculates the aeroilluminating relationships based on the detection of parametric objects windows (or symbols containing such objects) present in the compartment.
but I use the international version for which I am less informed about the latter object.
I do.

 

[fabio.revit]

Bye.
interesting question, complex answer.
to simplify, there is a parametric object in vw, it is called space/space. is a polygon that represents the rooms, to which the specific function is attributed. once designed vw automatically calculates the surface and, specifying the average height, the volume.
the space/space object is already connected to a format record so a table with all the data relating to the individual rooms of a building, from the dimensional ones to the finishes.
If you move walls, the space/room object follows them, then surfaces and volumes are always up to date.
in the Italian version there is also the room object that calculates the aeroilluminating relationships based on the detection of parametric objects windows (or symbols containing such objects) present in the compartment.
but I use the international version for which I am less informed about the latter object.
I do.

ok, more or less as well in archicad and revit.
but is it possible to obtain the grim representation of these volumes and areas in 3 sizes? in simple words the representation of the volume or the demonstration of the areas with triangulation?
Thank you.

 

[lory.b]

3d display of this object is a simple volume, otherwise you can choose to display it as a surface, perhaps filled with color to associate with a specific function.
I do.

 

[fabio.revit]

3d display of this object is a simple volume, otherwise you can choose to display it as a surface, perhaps filled with color to associate with a specific function.
I do.

That's what I wanted to know.
I imagine I can also quote it in 3d as any other object.
and for the demonstration of the calculation areas?

 

[lory.b]

Hi.
generally we have always handled in 2d, subdividing the surfaces into simple figures.
From the bim point of view, we haven't dealt with it yet in the studio, so it's hard to answer.
The American version, which is what I use, does not seem to have an instrument that facilitates this kind of work. I can't answer that.
I do.

 

[fabio.revit]

Hi.
generally we have always handled in 2d, subdividing the surfaces into simple figures.
From the bim point of view, we haven't dealt with it yet in the studio, so it's hard to answer.
The American version, which is what I use, does not seem to have an instrument that facilitates this kind of work. I can't answer that.
I do.

What a disappointment! :

 

[cad_parolisi]

What a disappointment! :

with allplan you can calculate what you ask without problems thanks to numerous reports that calculate and compose in simple figures quoted graphically in the report the most complex figures.

 

[fabio.revit]

with allplan you can calculate what you ask without problems thanks to numerous reports that calculate and compose in simple figures quoted graphically in the report the most complex figures.

I know that allplan from that point of view is very "strong", but it has a "legnosity" that attracts me little.
Thank you very much

 

[cad_parolisi]

I know that allplan from that point of view is very "strong", but it has a "legnosity" that attracts me little.
Thank you very much

false rumors put around art. Try to look here and then you can tell me
https://www.youtube.com/user/nemallplanitalia

 

[Anchorage]

cad_parolisis
It wouldn't be a bad idea if I could post a small example in the Allplan section,
I believe that many of the interested parties to the subject are subject volumes and the weighted average would be affected.

 

[fabio.revit]

false rumors put around art. Try to look here and then you can tell me
https://www.youtube.com/user/nemallplanitalia

with all the respect I have for nemetschek, institutional video tutorials I don't trust. are made (justly) to exalt positive sides and minimize negative ones but, who knows why, if during one of the live demonstrations ask some specific question things become less fluid. .

 

[cad_parolisi]

place an example image. here I checked surface and volume of a attic. as I said allplan has a lot of reports. in the image you can see a number of folders which contain additional folders and many reports.
As for the demonstrations, I also witnessed some nice presentation and, without mentioning names, when I asked a few specific questions, it was not that it went so well. indeed many presentations were made with slides and the software was practically never opened (especially presentations via web). If we want to be goals, allplans always show the live product. If instead of "pillola" movies you also watch webinar, you will see that it is so.

 

[fabio.revit]

place an example image. here I checked surface and volume of a attic. as I said allplan has a lot of reports. in the image you can see a number of folders which contain additional folders and many reports.
As for the demonstrations, I also witnessed some nice presentation and, without mentioning names, when I asked a few specific questions, it was not that it went so well. indeed many presentations were made with slides and the software was practically never opened (especially presentations via web). If we want to be goals, allplans always show the live product. If instead of "pillola" movies you also watch webinar, you will see that it is so.

You probably misunderstood me. I'm sure that allplan reports are very powerful, they always told me all the users I talked to, my "woody" refers to other software features, which I still know to be considered one of the top performance.

 

[jayvillaman]

Hi.
generally we have always handled in 2d, subdividing the surfaces into simple figures.
From the bim point of view, we haven't dealt with it yet in the studio, so it's hard to answer.
The American version, which is what I use, does not seem to have an instrument that facilitates this kind of work. I can't answer that.
I do.

Is it possible to use the international version with a licence? a thing that I find very uncomfortable are the doors and windows architect (which are only there in the version ita) however in my opinion have too many parameters and are difficult to manage.

 

[lory.b]

Is it possible to use the international version with a licence? a thing that I find very uncomfortable are the doors and windows architect (which are only there in the version ita) however in my opinion have too many parameters and are difficult to manage.

Hi.
No, it's not possible. are to be considered two different applications.
In fact, I have the international version, I would like to have the architect windows, because they are more configurable than the American rigid ones, which have, for example, the opening out and other "stranges".
I do.