vw si blocka

[zetadierre]

How do I understand when there is no hope? Sometimes it's a little disarming... For example now I've been waiting for 30 minutes to finish doing an operation with the cutter of a route extrusion. I'm sure he won't, but I wonder, if you can't even pull an extrusion on the path that made him do a command like that? Mah...

 

[zetadierre]

We could make a list of the Vectorworks Commandments. .

For example

1) do not draw a solid obtained by extrusion on path with a cutter but always uses another solid to achieve a subtraction between solids.

 

[enri]

Zeta, you have to explain why you go crazy with vw to do these things when you can do them well in a moment with rhino, then you go out in sat or parasolid, do one hundred times before. vw is great, but there is no comparison for the 3d with rhino. :

 

[zetadierre]

Zeta, you have to explain why you go crazy with vw to do these things when you can do them well in a moment with rhino, then you go out in sat or parasolid, do one hundred times before. vw is great, but there is no comparison for the 3d with rhino. :

enri, because it's a good or bad software I have a license, and I may not have any more. then certainly we are always willing to do 1000 things with 1000 programs, but eventually... if you know how to use one and 100% good is the best solution. If at the beginning of the university someone would tell me this sacred rule... I would have gone mad much less. I know how to use it and also quite well. learning vector is a priority for me, and madness will bring its benefits.

 

[enri]

This is safe, the commitment pays, but you can get the most out of simultaneous use of two sw like vw and rhino, the latter then is rather cheap also in view of a professional license. is in development, if you may be interested, an export plugin from rhino in ifc that is the open standard format of the bim, with the plugin visualarqFor architecture. exchange with vw should be total and painless. :wink:

 

[zetadierre]

This is safe, the commitment pays, but you can get the most out of simultaneous use of two sw like vw and rhino, the latter then is rather cheap also in view of a professional license. is in development, if you may be interested, an export plugin from rhino in ifc that is the open standard format of the bim, with the plugin visualarqFor architecture. exchange with vw should be total and painless. :wink:

Interesting! Could you explain yourself better? I don't know what you mean. is it just for windows?

 

[lory.b]

ifc format is the standard for interoperability between bim software.
Today is not yet perfect and not all softwarehouses (imagined as...) like development.
there is also an Italian chapter.http://www.iaiitalia.polimi.it/index.htm

 

[enri]

on the site you will find all info for visualarq, which is a plugin for rhino that introduces bim parametric functions, walls, stair windows etc, with the possibility to create any form with the power of rhino. as lory ifc says it should be the future standard for the exchange between cad bim. I still have to check how it behaves with vw this plugin, I recently discovered the export ifc from visualarq. Then I tell you. :
in fact so far I have used vw as cad 2d, since I use rhino to have the 3d, so for me it is essential to have a cad that matters well the 3d models and have a table of the aforementioned that allows me to put back our hands as often happens, and with vw I had problems both with the viewports, (as I do a horizontal section, that is a plant, without turning the model?) that with the wrong import, I have to go deeper.
I forgot, visualarq is now for windows because the beta of rhino for mac, does not yet have the sdk, so no developer still has the version of his own plugin for os x, but it is very likely that there will be.

 

[zetadierre]

We're talking about the future! interesting this speech of intercompatibility. I imagine that translating everything into a more "masticable" language means that if in rhino I make a wall, this is a wall for vector as it is for revit... actually would be a good thing. a pity that cannot implement it:

 

[BIMchecker]

ifc format is the standard for interoperability between bim software.
Today is not yet perfect and not all softwarehouses (imagined as...) like development.
there is also an Italian chapter.http://www.iaiitalia.polimi.it/index.htm

Some software houses do not like the development of this format (which is becoming increasingly marketed) as the syntax is dictated by an independent figure and therefore having to adapt to the syntax cannot dictate their market laws.
until this format remains independent will guarantee greater quality and "internationality".

more information about the ifc format also found on the official website: http://www.ifcwiki.org/index.php/main_pagewhere there is also the list of certified software or simply compatible for the ifc format:http://www.ifcwiki.org/index.php/commercial_software
http://www.ifcwiki.org/index.php/freeware