• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

walls - fold-out inserts/continuous facade

  • Thread starter Thread starter cadrev
  • Start date Start date

cadrev

Guest
hi guys, I would have a question about the walls regarding the fold to the inserts when a continuous facade is incorporated.
Unfortunately when it is embedded on a wall the facade continues does not behave in the same way as a door or window (I attach the photo).
I would care that the outer and inner plaster stuffed towards the facade, just as it happens on a window... is it possible?
I hope you (for revit)...I took a look on the network and on the forum but I did not find any news about it. . .
I hope you can help me. . .

Hi.
 

Attachments

  • muri.webp
    muri.webp
    12.3 KB · Views: 19
Tristan said:
you can use this "tampone" trick
http://ctrl-alt-cad.blogspot.com/2011/03/muri-e-ripiegature-degli-strati-in.html
Click to expand...
great! thanks for the answer tristan! really celery!
I thought it was me who made a mess despite studying stratigraphy and reading your post today, I found out that I've been hanging out empty. . .
Now I understand why I wanted to make complex layers I could never get the plants back with the sections.:

feel at this point I take advantage of it to ask for clarification. I have started using revit lately (a little more serious) to exploit the efficiency of the bim so as to create a finished project with only one software. However, the more I push myself with detail and the more well known some shortcomings of the program (which often depend on stratigraphy).
Is it wrong to use very complex stratigraphy walls? or is it better to utlize more walls perhaps flanked? in case you need several layers (in walls) in a design I also thought of using generic walls (1stratum) and then sample them with retinals, but so if they are changed the size I would end up having to put hands back to the layers built manually. in the end apart from the 3d would be like to make them on autocad...that is static
in these cases what would you conspire?

Well thank you very much again:finger:
 
I personally think it always depends on the target that has been set up. I find it insensitive to make walls with more than 4 or 5 layers and I find it insensitive to make laminated walls if the scale of the views does not fall below 50. the walls combined use them only in the case of the renovations in combination with the phases, otherwise let them just lose; I'm more of a hanging than a benefit. for details I prefer to work much more than 2d than modeling. a suggestion that I feel I give you is: it shapes only the essential strait, according to your needs "bim". for all the rest there is detail 2d.
 
Tristan said:
I personally think it always depends on the target that has been set up. I find it insensitive to make walls with more than 4 or 5 layers and I find it insensitive to make laminated walls if the scale of the views does not fall below 50. the walls combined use them only in the case of the renovations in combination with the phases, otherwise let them just lose; I'm more of a hanging than a benefit. for details I prefer to work much more than 2d than modeling. a suggestion that I feel I give you is: it shapes only the essential strait, according to your needs "bim". for all the rest there is detail 2d.
Click to expand...
I used them for the first time just for a renovation project, which included the addition of an external "cap".
As for the phases, I haven't tested them yet. but it is something I intend to study shortly.

Well what to say thank you for the availability and advice
soon:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top