why bind a mirrored part?

[braunfish]

in a mirror set a component.
Why do I have to bind or block it? Can I not make sure that it remains always in a sort of specular bond than the symmetry plan defined at the time of the operation?

 

[Brethil]

in a mirror set a component.
Why do I have to bind or block it? Can I not make sure that it remains always in a sort of specular bond than the symmetry plan defined at the time of the operation?

Hi.
a part or a speculative series once created must be fixed, not bound.
to fix it, go to the tree on the left, select the part with the right button and then click on "fixed".
being specular remains fixed just as if it were bound.
:smile:

 

[braunfish]

That's right.
the problem is that I would like to move the original part, the one that I generated by mirroring them positions accordingly keeping the symmetry.
or is it not possible?

 

[Tarkus]

Hi.
a part or a speculative series once created must be fixed, not bound.
to fix it, go to the tree on the left, select the part with the right button and then click on "fixed".
being specular remains fixed just as if it were bound.
:smile:

eye, so doing fixes in the environment and not the part of origin.
If you move the component of origin, the mirror remains where it is.
So, for me, it's better to win back. ...

@braunfish:

In fact, the mirror should behave like a series, if I move the origin, it also moves the mirror... but it's not like that.

 

[braunfish]

Thanks tarkus, that's what I feared.
sin, a loss of hallucinating time. . .

 

[Brethil]

That's right.
the problem is that I would like to move the original part, the one that I generated by mirroring them positions accordingly keeping the symmetry.
or is it not possible?

do not take for cast gold,
xò I think that if you want to do something like this you must first place the component as you prefer and then mirror it in the desired position; once mirrored and fixed remains where it is.
in a few words I do not think it is possible to move the original part and make the mirror follow it; also because mirror and fixed serve precisely to make it not happen.. .

I think you need to find your solution by looking into the mobility constraints of the pieces.. .

:smile:

 

[Tarkus]

no, you put it back on the mirroring floor giving as a distance the parameter of the quota you gave between the mirroring plane and the part of origin. . .

 

[Brethil]

eye, so doing fixes in the environment and not the part of origin.
If you move the component of origin, the mirror remains where it is.
So, for me, it's better to win back. ...

you are right tarkus, but I think that then depends a lot on what one assembles; I usually mirror sheet panels that in the axieme environment must remain fixed x eternity; and so instead that you get fixed everything that is more rapid..(or? ...maybe I'm wrong:

_

 

[Brethil]

no, you put it back on the mirroring floor giving as a distance the parameter of the quota you gave between the mirroring plane and the part of origin. . .

I think you're right.

 

[pagnotz]

in general the habit of fixing the components, because faster than binding them, is to be taken into account only if you are 100% sure not to have to change them, otherwise it only creates so many cases. I do not do it personally.

 

[bebeto]

They could put a reference option to the initial object, once the mirror is done, the user may decide whether to inherit the constraints.
catia has the symmetry commando that is very useful.

 

[Tarkus]

They could put a reference option to the initial object, once the mirror is done, the user may decide whether to inherit the constraints.
catia has the symmetry commando that is very useful.

Yes, you're right, at least with respect to the mirroring plan, it could be automatically bound...