winchill vs sap plm: help!!!

[gulps]

Hello, everyone!
I need your valuable help to understand what plm does more or better than windchill...or maybe worse!
We come to us...after years of use of windchill pdmlink 8.0...it is considering to pass to sap plm
I have read several discussions in the forum but I have not found "technically speaking" something really full, like the possible problems of knowledge or the possible advantages of the latter.
I would point out that we have been using pro/e since 1996.

Can you help me understand a little more?? ?

thank you and thank you again!

 

[bragst]

Bye. I can't help you on the difference between windchill and plm because the first while knowing it I didn't use it. from about 1 year we use sap plm installed because we know.if you use it as pdm as the old intralink (check in check out) is fine. you have the advantage of having a single integrated database. then if you start using it as plm and depending on the complexity of the assemblies can go a bit in the ball sometimes in the sense that not always the construction of the xml file of the structure of the axieme is read and written at the first shot...it takes a second chance. the fundamental point however is always upstream or the initial migration of the data that is very delicate and if done badly can lead to swallows during normal downstream use.

 

[gulps]

Bye!
I thank you...in fact, the topic on which I was more concerned to have delucidations was the treatment of data having a fairly complex organizational structure structured on multiple design offices located in different geographical points, without forgetting the family table speech, udf and interchange groups of which we make regular use. on the single db speech I can agree even if there are other ways to make "spell" know with other pdm/plm.

Thanks again for the answer.