• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

windows 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter MFT
  • Start date Start date

MFT

Guest
Good evening.

someone knows or hao already tried if osd turns with windows 7

Thank you.

Mar
 
But with windows 7 64bit I don't work the very trivial text editor notepad++ handle! ! ! ! ! !
 
thanks also I have the 16.00a, of course that this " cursed" osd works with everything is just good mouth.:biggrin:

Mar
It's good to use a program of the last century! :biggrin:

a week ago I installed gbg dm7.0 (release for winnt3.5) on win7 prof. and left immediately!
 
It's good to use a program of the last century! :biggrin:

a week ago I installed gbg dm7.0 (release for winnt3.5) on win7 prof. and left immediately!
It would be said that "antiquely" :smile: the software wrote them why they worked for purpose (cad, text editor, photo editing etc.) while today they seem to write them to increase the sales of ram modules and keep busy entire populations of beta tester :rolleyes:
 
It would be said that "antiquely" :smile: the software wrote them why they worked for purpose (cad, text editor, photo editing etc.) while today they seem to write them to increase the sales of ram modules and keep busy entire populations of beta tester :rolleyes:
They wrote them in pencil.
 
I have windows 7 64bit and the text editor notepad++ works download the latest version from the site of notepad+
 
I just get a little problem. .
a warning message to update annotation views:
"one or more thread size(s) attached to wrong element(s). all the thread
domensions can not be updated"

Why?
 
I just get a little problem. .
a warning message to update annotation views:
"one or more thread size(s) attached to wrong element(s). all the thread
domensions can not be updated"

Why?
this does not depend on seven is another problem related to threads. probabilmet by updating the quota vertices are attached no more to the hole but to something else
 
It would be said that "antiquely" :smile: the software wrote them why they worked for purpose (cad, text editor, photo editing etc.) while today they seem to write them to increase the sales of ram modules and keep busy entire populations of beta tester :rolleyes:
I had the opportunity to see ug v18 turn on a modern pc.
It's all instant... especially the graphics and windows.
crazy to see how software has been slowed down by new user interface paradigms.
 
I had the opportunity to see ug v18 turn on a modern pc.
It's all instant... especially the graphics and windows.
crazy to see how software has been slowed down by new user interface paradigms.
I had recently done the same experiment with solidworks 2001: impressive, it seems fuznion for telepathy:-)
it is to think that the avalanche of money that we send to these "scientists" (to pronounce to the totò! :smile: ) the programming for updates to the new versions via enriched with thatche new feature and many graphic minchiate and pseudo ergonomics are spent quite badly.
for years I support it, a beautiful planetary strike takes us; all stopped for a year without subscription. see then how they move the c## or if they want to continue to fill the ferrari
 
I had recently done the same experiment with solidworks 2001: impressive, it seems fuznion for telepathy:-)
it is to think that the avalanche of money that we send to these "scientists" (to pronounce to the totò! :smile: ) the programming for updates to the new versions via enriched with thatche new feature and many graphic minchiate and pseudo ergonomics are spent quite badly.
for years I support it, a beautiful planetary strike takes us; all stopped for a year without subscription. see then how they move the c## or if they want to continue to fill the ferrari
in fact,
I've always supported it. the performance (and therefore the goodness) of a software must be compared to equal machine. and vice versa. .

but unfortunately it is now a vicious circle, new version >>>> > > > new hardware (maybe not everything, but a piece do that update it).

greetings
Mar
 
in fact,
I've always supported it. the performance (and therefore the goodness) of a software must be compared to equal machine. and vice versa. .

but unfortunately it is now a vicious circle, new version >>>> > > > new hardware (maybe not everything, but a piece do that update it).

greetings
Mar
However, for the responsiveness of menus, both given that xp and win7 can be set with the graphic appearance of win2000, as well as removing the various effects of transition and fade:
dx key on PC resources --> properties --> advanced --> performance --> adjusts so you get the best performance.

the increase in performance is very remarkable.

the same for solid edge: it can be set by disabling all the graphic fighetteries (shadings on the floors, semi-transparency, previews etc etc.). That's a lot of speed. I also think with swx is possible, like working without realview and similar.

p.s. then there is the problem of the user interface: who owns them (pro/e, cocreate) does a little as you want. who instead programmed the cad with the ms libraries, I think it is forced to contract to use what the microsoft decides, and then you see those obbrobris type solidedge st1-2.
 
Good day to all,
I tried to load gbg 7.0 on win7 pro (connecting the hw key) but when I get the error "unrecoverable system theme".
Has anyone ever solved such a problem?
Thank you.
roberto
It's good to use a program of the last century! :biggrin:

a week ago I installed gbg dm7.0 (release for winnt3.5) on win7 prof. and left immediately!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top