workmanship excluded from the mirrored part

[Catafratto]

Hello, everyone!

I pose my original "problem": I have a symmetrical hopper: I modeled one half and "specified" the other, getting my two distinct parts. in a second time I had to apply a writing on both pieces; I did it with the swing operation and, of course, on the mirrored derived part I appeared the mirrored writing. I solved it quickly by covering the writing and doing it again, but I thought if there was a more refined way... I don't think there's a way to exclude individual work from a mirrored derivative part, right? Every now and then I'd be comfortable, and not just for these writings! the workings of together would not solve, because almost always it is about plates and I would need the complete development of everything. . .

I hope I've been clear. . .

 

[Peppe]

you could apply the writing only on the flat model, create the model and create a sketch, these processing are not applied to the folded model for which they will be 2 separate processing, one on the dx and one on the left.

 

[Peppe]

you could apply the writing only on the flat model, create the model and create a sketch, these processing are not applied to the folded model for which they will be 2 separate processing, one on the dx and one on the left.

if you did not need to see it on the fold.
or you could generate the mirror and temporarily suppress the connection to the original part. Now you can add your writing to the original part, go to the mirror and create your own writing.

 

[Catafratto]

are two good ideas, complementary depending on the situation... to the first above all I would never have arrived!
Thank you!

However apart from the specific case, I'm right in saying that you can't do something mysterious to me a "monco" mirror of some workmanship, right?
Bye!

 

[Peppe]

However apart from the specific case, I'm right in saying that you can't do something mysterious to me a "monco" mirror of some workmanship, right?

Do you know how many times I wish I could include/exclude work from the mirror??? ? Unfortunately we cannot, hopefully in the future! ! !
but who lived hoping, died...
Hi.

 

[diegus]

I don't know how much more convenient it is than you use.... But who knows!

design the first half without writing.
in a new part comes the one previously drawn; I add the writing; Save.
except by name the latter, to create the second half; I carry the end over the writing and I mirror the whole part by eliminating the original; I take the end down and redefine the sketch of the writing on the new face.
Obviously the first part designed is master for the other two, any dimensional modification should be made to this. the others will update accordingly.

Try us and decide whether it's better or worse than you do now... .

 

[Tarkus]

I too, too...
But can you write a mirrored text? I couldn't.
However in case you can do:
in part I do a sketch with straight and superimposed writing, a sketch with mirrored writing.
I extrude both creating new bodies that penetrate the already existing thickness.
I then derive my two parts, a straight one, a mirror, letting which of the two bodies-written I want to derive and after with the joint command, I subtract the written body and I create my ass.
only neo, if you talk about a hopper, farewell flat model, unless you do an initial derivation of the hopper to create the part to.... .
or... is the fatigue that makes me say caxxate:biggrin:

 

[Catafratto]

:smile: how many possibilities! I confess that I still hoped to hear myself say "but you're a nun! do you not see the check on 'excluding work from the tree''" ahimè, this possibility is precisely excluded :
thanks to the tips however, they are all good options for the future.. .