• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

ws suitable for running uug

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidev
  • Start date Start date

davidev

Guest
Hello everyone, you can recommend a possible ws solution of the dova rs tranquilmnte ug the full version mac 3.
in a few words the version of the video card, processor etc.
Thank you all.

greetings
 
It's always hard to give advice, you're already wrong on your own, if someone gives you a hand:

you should add rather if the use is voted to model, make cams or big assemblies, rendering or other.

in fact if you cam you need a pumped processor, maybe 2 and ram to look after.
if you make modeling and rendering a good graphics ( nvidia and not mistakes for sure ) .
in any case fast discs.

avoid the amd processors, I have a ws fujitsu with 2 opteron and immediately noticed the gap with the old intel (xeon) .
 
It's always hard to give advice, you're already wrong on your own, if someone gives you a hand:

you should add rather if the use is voted to model, make cams or big assemblies, rendering or other.

in fact if you cam you need a pumped processor, maybe 2 and ram to look after.
if you make modeling and rendering a good graphics ( nvidia and not mistakes for sure ) .
in any case fast discs.

avoid the amd processors, I have a ws fujitsu with 2 opteron and immediately noticed the gap with the old intel (xeon) .
... and especially w7 64 bits immediately... (with so much ram)
 
avoid the amd processors, I have a ws fujitsu with 2 opteron and immediately noticed the gap with the old intel (xeon) .
a little summary in comparison I would say... In addition, the barcelona cores are well above the xeons.

in any case a picture is obligatory.
 
a little summary in comparison I would say... In addition, the barcelona cores are well above the xeons.

in any case a picture is obligatory.
We did some tests at a car manufacturer.
- with nx7
- with wxp 64
- with the specific use houses (large assembly opening, table regeneration, large model regeneration)
the machines equipped intel were better.

... surely you cannot generalize.
 
the machines equipped intel were better.
probably the source code is compiled on intel machines. You should try to compile it on cpu of the amd and then turn the executable so generated on amd processors for a realistic comparison.

Clearly, it's just a siemens thing.
 
probably the source code is compiled on intel machines. You should try to compile it on cpu of the amd and then turn the executable so generated on amd processors for a realistic comparison.

Clearly, it's just a siemens thing.
You're probably right.
from what I heard big sisw customers use all cpu intel... and probably the code is optimized x intel.

... even if development tools don't think they're so sophisticated if you want to keep compatibility. ...
 
from what I heard big sisw customers use all cpu intel.. .
"No one has ever been fired for buying ibm."
... even if development tools don't think they're so sophisticated if you want to keep compatibility. ...
on this I don't know well, but I've had some experience compiling a 64-bit fem code on linux: If you want, you can take into account the processor you're using by saying that you're going to take the "mathematic core libraries" that provides the intel or amd, depending on the processor on which you'll use the software.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top