Zero dopo la virgola

[Lorenz578]

Good morning.
I have recently found myself in a new ut, but in 22 years of experience as a designer, I have never found drawings listed in this way (I attach an example any)as you can see, I have highlighted in green what turns out to be a quotation never seen before and that is the ",0" put after a full quota.
not within the specific discussion born in the office when I asked "but why the comma zero after the full quota? What's the point?"

I've been looking for legislation, so I can assert my reasons, but I haven't found anything.
Can someone help me that way or at least confirm that I have never seen anything like this?
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

to me there is no rule that defines the use of zero after the comma.
For me it is useless, I have also made it present in a recent discussion, but every office has its own management and has to adapt.
the most obvious reason of the zero that comes to my mind is to prevent you from thinking that the quota has been rounded; , but there have been problems in the past and this is the solution to avoid repeated

 

[Vittorio]

Hello, I saw similar designs myself
But in these drawings there was a note where he said that quotas with a decimal had a certain tolerance... the odds with two decimals had another.
I don't know if it's your case.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

But in these drawings there was a note where he said that quotas with a decimal had a certain tolerance... the odds with two decimals had another.

Now that you're talking about it, I remember taking care of it, too, and you have no idea what a mess came out of the office with the quality manager, the office manager, and the shop.

 

[Lorenz578]

to me there is no rule that defines the use of zero after the comma.
For me it is useless, I have also made it present in a recent discussion, but every office has its own management and has to adapt.
the most obvious reason of the zero that comes to my mind is to prevent you from thinking that the quota has been rounded; , but there have been problems in the past and this is the solution to avoid repeated

Hello Masses.
but why do I put the operator in the condition of having to think? If there is a quota 10,1 for example and rolling to 10 the operator should not even affect the reason and never know it. I don't see the point of putting the 0.0
I find it useless, and I hoped there was a rule that would prohibit its use.
I'm going to make a point, but it's really amazing this thing, meaningless.
Would you please link me the discussion you're talking about?
Thank you.

 

[Lorenz578]

Now that you're talking about it, I remember taking care of it, too, and you have no idea what a mess came out of the office with the quality manager, the office manager, and the shop.

And they're right to mess up.
That's funny.

 

[Vittorio]

Now that you're talking about it, I remember taking care of it, too, and you have no idea what a mess came out of the office with the quality manager, the office manager, and the shop.

I guess. and anyway it is a system that I do not share.
because, if with a decimal tolerance is ±0.1. an account is to keep it on a quota 10,0 and an account is to keep it on 500,0

 

[Lorenz578]

Hello, I saw similar designs myself
But in these drawings there was a note where he said that quotas with a decimal had a certain tolerance... the odds with two decimals had another.
I don't know if it's your case.

Hi.
No, it's not my case.
but also in what we quote you find everything absurd and confusing for those who have to operate

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Hello Masses.
but why do I put the operator in the condition of having to think? If there is a quota 10,1 for example and rolling to 10 the operator should not even affect the reason and never know it. I don't see the point of putting the 0.0

as I always struggle to explain.
I have not written that the not to put the decimal place the operator in the situation of having to think if the quota is actually whole or rounded; But I mean that we want to avoid in any way that there may be doubt. By the way, it is my hypothesis that I use this type of quotation. What motivation did they give you in the office for this methodology?

I can tell you that I had to redesign details of which I only had the pdf I found geometries in which the quotas were rounded, because indeed not functional to the operation, but that overall they made it impossible to redesign correctly. This is a little extreme.

Would you please link me the discussion you're talking about?
Thank you.

la debate However, it was about the control of quotation and not about the utility or not of zero.

And they're right to mess up.

the casino was not on the utility or not, but on the inability of the present to univocally decipher the meaning of this system.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

doing research on the net I found a pdf, the only one for now, in which a lesson of civil engineering is summed up and it is stated that the quotas must quote "in all the drawing you must always use two decimal positions after the comma even in case the second is equal to zero (e.g.
similarly 1,30 and never 1.3). "
the reference standard is the uniso 129-1.
personal consideration:
the text is of civil engineering and could be that it has a quotation system slightly different from mechanics; the norm cited has been withdrawn and replaced by the uni en iso 129-1:2021 currently in force.

 

[Lorenz578]

No, you explained very well, I know it was just your guess.
Why? because it is right that there is also zero, after a full quota
Maybe it's like you hypothesize, it somehow strengthens the fact that the share is full.
for me it creates more confusion.
thanks for the comparison

 

[Lorenz578]

doing research on the net I found a pdf, the only one for now, in which a lesson of civil engineering is summed up and it is stated that the quotas must quote "in all the drawing you must always use two decimal positions after the comma even in case the second is equal to zero (e.g.
similarly 1,30 and never 1.3). "
the reference standard is the uniso 129-1.
personal consideration:
the text is of civil engineering and could be that it has a quotation system slightly different from mechanics; the norm cited has been withdrawn and replaced by the uni en iso 129-1:2021 currently in force.

Thank you very much

 

[francescodue]

Hello, everyone.
I read the intrigued discussion from the title.
I have a memory of school times: the teacher claimed that it was aesthetically preferable to quote with the same number of decimals: if some quota was, for example, 1.35, the others had to be 3.20 or 7.50. then always use either two decimals or round to keep only one decimal. I absolutely do not remember if you referred to some norms. but, the memory is cloudy, I think it also hinted at putting decimals on the round quotas to keep the uniformity of style.

 

[Lorenz578]

Hello, everyone.
I read the intrigued discussion from the title.
I have a memory of school times: the teacher claimed that it was aesthetically preferable to quote with the same number of decimals: if some quota was, for example, 1.35, the others had to be 3.20 or 7.50. then always use either two decimals or round to keep only one decimal. I absolutely do not remember if you referred to some norms. but, the memory is cloudy, I think it also hinted at putting decimals on the round quotas to keep the uniformity of style.

I've had drawings since 1998 and I swear I've never seen putting zero after comma on a full share. and I've changed a lot of jobs.
But apparently there are others who do it

 

[stevie]

Good morning.
I have recently found myself in a new ut, but in 22 years of experience as a designer, I have never found drawings listed in this way (I attach an example any)View attachment 61995as you can see, I have highlighted in green what turns out to be a quotation never seen before and that is the ",0" put after a full quota.
not within the specific discussion born in the office when I asked "but why the comma zero after the full quota? What's the point?"

I've been looking for legislation, so I can assert my reasons, but I haven't found anything.
Can someone help me that way or at least confirm that I have never seen anything like this?
Thank you.

I don't think there's a norm that "forbid" to use the 0 after the comma, the fact remains that a similar quotation is horrible. . .

 

[Lorenz578]

I don't think there's a rule that "let's go" to use 0 after the comma. a similar quotation is horrible. . .

your questo siamo completely d'accordo

 

[Cristallo]

in building the 2 decimal digits are (almost) the standard.
it is 10,00 and is substantiated meters. unless in cm or mm (but indicate it with clear letters).
if I see a quota 10,3 (m) I shiver. If I see a 10.3 (mm) it seems more than normal.
Perhaps it depends a lot on the fields of membership of the table.