• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

cswp solidworks

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox76
  • Start date Start date
I've tried it twice lately and they've fucked me in all 2.

I got tired of paying €100 at a time so for the moment I renounce:biggrin:

Hi.
 
I know I wasn't very loquacious but I wrote quickly::finger:

However the component is always the same change only the measurements and therefore the values of the mass and volume.

practically the program shows you what you need to draw.you models and the program asks you to assign a certain material and the decimal digits that it usually wants 2 or 3.When modeled asks you the weight, then it makes you change measures and requires the volume, then it makes you add nervature functions, sunshades etc and requires weight.

here everything simple in fact here I did not have problems. Then always on the same piece makes you do an analysis with cosmos that however wants it with the English system so the units become pounds on the picture thumb (if not erro).

It's okay.

I think I have beaten the axioms. It makes you shape a series of parts that resemble a motor with a lot of shirt, camshaft, piston and biella. All these components have shared quotas that are indicated with letters a,b,c,d etc. once modeled everything makes you do a set and asks you the position of the baicentro.poi it makes you change all these odds and it demands you.

I think I was wrong here because I didn't link all the measures through equation and obviously I couldn't remember them all every time that made me change them so the result didn't match.

what I recommend is to look at only the odds that and the magicians that makes you see him, try not to take initiative beyond the due

I hope I've been exhausting even though I've been rejected:

Hi.
 

Attachments

  • part1.webp
    part1.webp
    31.2 KB · Views: 35
  • 9.webp
    9.webp
    16.2 KB · Views: 25
  • crankshaft.webp
    crankshaft.webp
    19.4 KB · Views: 26
  • connectionrod.webp
    connectionrod.webp
    11.7 KB · Views: 26
  • assem1.webp
    assem1.webp
    14.4 KB · Views: 25
Thank you so much for your help.

last night in a barrel of "follia" I tried to give the exam and the result a

skin: mad: .

I want to give advice to those who give the exam always encircled by those who give the score + high (the second part of the test) because to be rejected with 145 points and not to have run 4 of the 18 questions (for 3 hours they look so many but then the time flies :redface:) is really hard to send down.
 
Hi.

I'm sorry for peeling.it's a real nuisance especially when I use the program for ten years:biggrin:

Since we're talking about it and sincerely I'm interested in it, could you tell your exam a little bit? How did you get your asses?

Hi.
 
not to discredit cswp, but what advantages does it offer you? It is well known that it is fried air and breaking your head for these things I think it takes little...
 
not to discredit cswp, but what advantages does it offer you? It is well known that it is fried air and breaking your head for these things I think it takes little...
I believe that it is undertaken as an examination to have a certificate in hand to "sfoggiare" when necessary. both in case of probable recruitment, whether for example you intend to make yourself a proper site, a tutorial or something like that.
It's a bit like for cars, sometimes it's just a little shit that doesn't let you pass the revision, even if you both know that that particular has no influence on the behavior of the vehicle (for example aesthetic changes).

I was also interested in doing so, but at the moment I do not want to dedicate 3 hours to dassault systèmes.:biggrin:
 
not to discredit cswp, but what advantages does it offer you? It is well known that it is fried air and breaking your head for these things I think it takes little...
Maybe you're right.

I just want to put myself in the game to verify my knowledge.

I certainly don't remake my business cards with the sw logo to show that I have the certification as well as I wouldn't present it in my resume. Because as I see it, you know how to copy a piece starting from a quoted design like sw wants, but then you know how to size it for what to do? can you design in the strict sense of the word?

as mentioned above is alone to verify my knowledge and above all the method I use to work with solid.

I think there is no one who can assess it better than who created sw.
 
Maybe you're right.

I just want to put myself in the game to verify my knowledge.

I certainly don't remake my business cards with the sw logo to show that I have the certification as well as I wouldn't present it in my resume. Because as I see it, you know how to copy a piece starting from a quoted design like sw wants, but then you know how to size it for what to do? can you design in the strict sense of the word?

as mentioned above is alone to verify my knowledge and above all the method I use to work with solid.

I think there is no one who can assess it better than who created sw.
I disagree with this argument. to solidworks (as in all software houses) there are more than any programmers who know all the operating modes but do not know (in my opinion) in-depth all that can be done by having the various tools available. I'll explain better.
who makes molds all day, after a few years he knows a lot of tricks and workaround and manages to develop his own work probably before and better than those years before he had educated him.
the same applies to every other sector. I think that the daily experience of use (and not sporadic for test purposes) make known qualities and defects at this point to be able to create procedures in the state of art, something not feasible without even having a specific product to design.
I often talk to certified technicians, who know the operation of topdown and external references, but when I showed him how to work... They never thought you could do that. I think cswp has more or less the same value as the European computer driver's license... a piece of paper, mandatory for those in the training and education circuit, but useless to those who must provide projects.
 
.... I think cswp has more or less the same value as the European computer license... a piece of paper, mandatory for those in the training and education circuit, but useless to those who must provide projects.
Now I share.
I add that the huose software is like who designs a motorcycle. it does to go on the road on 2 wheels, balanced in the right way, putting electronic devices that at certain stages or corners of fold etc., come into operation to allow a more safe and comfortable guide.

then there are those who take the motorcycle in question and do the "burnouts", he pushes, brakes and rises on the front wheel, jumps down holding to the saddle and goes up while he is in motion, makes jumps; with so much amazement and applause of the crowd.. :wink:
 
I did cswp certification a year ago.it is not so simple, especially for the times made available. with three hours you can't afford too much doubt.. .
What? I don't know.
between not being certified and I prefer the second group: in these times of magre cows everything serves!:wink:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top