• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

macbook pro vs of m6500

  • Thread starter Thread starter omegaquadroerre
  • Start date Start date

omegaquadroerre

Guest
Hello everyone
How about these two laptops used for solid edge v19?

thanks for the advice.
 
Hello everyone
How about these two laptops used for solid edge v19?

thanks for the advice.
the m6500 is the best you can have as a notebook for designers.
practically has all the dedicated hardware for cad programs.

costs a nice amount anyway and then depends on the configuration you choose.
starting from 1500€ VAT excl. up to 4000€

I don't know if it's okay with the cad.
 
apart from the mac, which with the cads does not go too well, the m6500 for solid edge seems to me a little exaggerated :p
 
which graphics card has the macbook pro?
if you have no particular reasons to use the mac anyway I would say of.
the macbook pro has the geforce 9400m. I don't know how it goes with cad.
I currently use one of the m65 that mounts the picture fx350.

I don't know how solid edge would work in the simulated windows of the mac pro.

attracts me a lot of mac screen: very sharp. and also the construction quality.

Has anyone done this experience?
 
the macbook pro has the geforce 9400m. I don't know how it goes with cad.
I currently use one of the m65 that mounts the picture fx350.

I don't know how solid edge would work in the simulated windows of the mac pro.

attracts me a lot of mac screen: very sharp. and also the construction quality.

Has anyone done this experience?
I have the m6400 with the rgbled screen, anti-reflective (unpolished!!!) and you see it as god, slightly strong colors but setting it is beautiful.
constructive quality: the "old" m90 and m6300 were a little + solid, the last seem a little + plasticosi, cmq are always a span ahead of the competition (asus ke scrostano, acer ke scricchiolano, nonexistent assistants, etc)
solid edge uses the video card from sadness, any card will never prove the real power, cmq with the pictures go on the very safe.

the mac not even consider it x use it as cad in windows simulation, it will not even go ahead.... indeed, I do not consider it for nothing else.... he he he.
 
I have the m6400 with the rgbled screen, anti-reflective (unpolished!!!) and you see it as god, slightly strong colors but setting it is beautiful.
constructive quality: the "old" m90 and m6300 were a little + solid, the last seem a little + plasticosi, cmq are always a span ahead of the competition (asus ke scrostano, acer ke scricchiolano, nonexistent assistants, etc)
solid edge uses the video card from sadness, any card will never prove the real power, cmq with the pictures go on the very safe.

the mac not even consider it x use it as cad in windows simulation, it will not even go ahead.... indeed, I do not consider it for nothing else.... he he he.
Did you try it or hypothesize it?
the new macbook pro has two video processors geforce 9600... it seems strange to me that the solid edge...... .
 
Did you try it or hypothesize it?
the new macbook pro has two video processors geforce 9600... it seems strange to me that the solid edge...... .
The problem is not the graphics card, which is good for moderate performance. The problem is to make a software run that heavily uses opengl libraries and consumes ram vagonates under emulator.
Besides using geforces with a cad is always a tern to the lot: It could be fine but if it goes wrong there are no solutions if not to change the laptop. the possible problems are the classic ones of the non-certified cards: screen artifacts, cursor disappearing in sketch mode, missing screen refresh. are quite unlikely problems with native windows (but not impossible), I think they are almost certain with emulated windows.
However they are considerations related to the hw, not so much to a cad or another.

If you think you're using the dual boot system, there's already a user using a mac but with native windows, not emulated. He'll tell you.
 
thanks for the answers: I'm starting to figure out something more.
Can you tell me who this user is using the mac?
 
I do not know if you refer to me, however I use a mac (for example) to make programs cad and render, logically in windows and not in emulation.

to these conditions I can only tell you that when I sit in front it is always a great pleasure! :smile:
 
I only intervene to make a mess, especially if there are hunters and marcofs:biggrin::wink:

apart from the jokes, the macbook pro costs more, also because it is built much better, but it has the graphics card lower than the, and I think solid needs certified cards to go well, then picture. then use a mac only with win is not the maximum, the pleasure is to use os x, as well as the machine. I'd advise you if you use it for work, I still think if you go with that card, it's not really small, but I'm talking about 9600 gt, if you take the base with 9400 no. always in dual boot.

recent ot-notizie, for the interested, give a completed porting of autocad and revit on mac, (autodesk source) and a very probable solidwork. :
 
I only intervene to make a mess, especially if there are hunters and marcofs:biggrin::wink:
I'm here! :

I have a m4400 I use with solidworks. mounts a fx1700 picture and has the anti-reflective display (matte one) with led lighting that is spectacular.
Go to missile.
If there had been a laptop mac with on a painting I would have done a little thought, to use obviously with windowx having available osx for other things.
I imagine that when the apple decides to give us a picture, it will cost at least twice what you would pay on one of them, because they have to make fighetti and make them believe that their picture is more quadruple than ours on win:tongue:
apart from the jokes, the macbook pro costs more, also because it is built much better, but it has the graphics card lower than the, and I think solid needs certified cards to go well, then picture.
So you confirm the least bad... I was afraid you were an apple fanboy:

Hi.
 
the real and only difference between a mac and another pc is that I have never seen a mac among the piles of pcs released in the collection centers.:rolleyes:
 
the real and only difference between a mac and another pc is that I have never seen a mac among the piles of pcs released in the collection centers.:rolleyes:
[mode bastard ON]because those who buy mac are in love with the operating system, they don't necessarily have to turn apps, and they are proud to belong to the exclusive apple club. would never get rid of its obsolete g4, of the vetusto g5 etc. while not being able to install the new mirabolants know of the apple, do not throw them in the rusco but put them to rest in special glass windows with internal air conditioning and all the nights, on the ingloss specially set up in front of the showcase, recite, with the whole family, a "pater ave gloria" in favor of the extinct loved ones.[mode bastard OFF]Eciao : Jiggrin:tongue:
 
guys just talk about mac vs pc senno' I'll send you to those seminascosti forums like "operational systems and general usage software". I'm master here and I can do it! :tongue:

However gerod turns solid edge on a mac, we wait for him to bring us the test experience on the field.
 

Attachments

  • mac.webp
    mac.webp
    54.1 KB · Views: 23
You know, when it's there, if you don't use your PC anymore. :

I do not have a mac with bootcamp, but, I hope for a little while, I also have a pc :)
 
You know, when it's there, if you don't use your PC anymore. :
I don't think they'll ever do that. It's about rewriting the program. I have doubts on swx, since I know that they say that the version for mac or linux is in preparation, but in so many years it's never seen anything, so I'm almost sure that it's the usual commercial chiacchere (it's for all the software of course, to hear the commercial in its time already' in 2001 or so' of there' the linux version of think3 was at the end that he will get out, who did.
the rest also to the version of unigraphics that turns on mac is a porting by way of saying, in fact turns on x11....

p.s., however, I do not like the mac mainly for the commercial policy of the company, then on the machines everyone makes his ideas obviously.
 
I admit I have a weakness for visionary genes so I love it.

I also like bmw (cars) but I don't own one, because I prefer to spend them elsewhere.

but not for this reason I consider bmwisti a sect, even if when you enter the dealership, they also charge you the air you breathe, in fractions from 5 minutes each. (I have the bike and I know it).

I would like to say that, in order to make arguments of course, : I am only a final user (pardon!) but after 25 years of various pcs (and I assure you that I also currently work at least 5 different machines, certified etc. etc. monstrous etc. etc. also at customers, but how I recalculate the image the nvidia 8800 (which I don't feel to be anything layered) that I have on the mac there is no.

using the 3dconnexion zoom and navigation within the 3d image of the cad does not know limits or slowdowns, which instead matches in even more "dominated" machines.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top