[se v19] da .stp a .par o .psm

[albertot]

Hello, everyone.
How do I go from a .stp to go back to .psm or .par orgiinali? or better, how do I from the bodyfeature to recreate the various functions?

 

[Marco74]

Hello, everyone.
How do I go from a .stp to go back to .psm or .par orgiinali? or better, how do I from the bodyfeature to recreate the various functions?

You can't go back to the feature.

 

[zeigs]

It's not done. is as if you want to go back to the word file from a printed sheet: You have to rewrite it. at the most you pass it to an ocr, which in the specific case is the feature recognizer, but does what it can.

 

[cacciatorino]

If your license level allows you, you can use the automatic feature recognizer (afr), which is an algorithm that gives an imported solid, try to rebuild the features that you can then change.

Consider that what he does is just an attempt, which could also be very different from the solid starting in the cad of origin.

 

[albertot]

very clear not to be able to trace back to the various features... but then what is the .stp?
If you want to recreate the solid, what would be the best road?

 

[Leso]

the stp is an interchange format between various cad 3d. is not made to reconstruct the features. to recreate the solid or use the feature recognizer or you don't care about the story and pull it up with the s that (in theory ) doesn't need the features tree.

 

[albertot]

the stp is an interchange format between various cad 3d. is not made to reconstruct the features. to recreate the solid or use the feature recognizer or you don't care about the story and pull it up with the s that (in theory ) doesn't need the features tree.

What do I do if I can't change it?
a .dxf I can change it and save it as .dft or .dwg with my additions.
a .stp?
Besides... if I stopped at v19?
vien convenient to specify that I work mainly with sheets. . .

Hello everyone

 

[Leso]

what you give it to you can make the table as you like.
can look as it is done, can check in 3d the individual quotas.
You can put it in your 3d set that maybe you did with another cad... I often use these formats to exchange data with suppliers and customers. they are not perfect, but they are often very comfortable.

 

[Stefano5]

what you give it to you can make the table as you like.
can look as it is done, can check in 3d the individual quotas.
You can put it in your 3d set that maybe you did with another cad... I often use these formats to exchange data with suppliers and customers.

I confirm, they are very comfortable, even when importing the solids of the commercial components.
then it is not even true that you can not change, you can add and remove everything you want, of course it is clear that having the structure (the tree of the original features) would be easier, but working on different cad you can not have the full barrel and the drunk wife:biggrin:

 

[Tequila]

I confirm, they are very comfortable, even when importing the solids of the commercial components.
then it is not even true that you can not change, you can add and remove everything you want, of course it is clear that having the structure (the tree of the original features) would be easier, but working on different cad you can not have the full barrel and the drunk wife:biggrin:

...I only add a small personal note to these words

of course it is clear that having the original structure (the feature tree) would be easier

It is true only if the model is created logically and if you have to move things, those tied follow the move, otherwise you will find a mountain of exclamation points on the feature tree.
I unfortunately had negative experience from external collaborators where the 3d models were subvinculated and shaped in a questionable way.

Hi.

 

[Stefano5]

Of course if the model is made to a member of the following:
However, you must agree that especially on sheet metals, it would be better to redefine some features made in a questionable way to maintain the structure of the sheet, which allows you for example to develop the model.
What with the step...nisba!
then you think that I am a free professional and it happens to me exactly the opposite of what happens to you, that is often they pass me assemblies to put back in place and with the parts with feature to redefine :tongue:
12 years of work on the solid edge should be seen somewhere, or not? :wink:

 

[Tequila]

Of course if the model is made to a member of the following:
However, you must agree that especially on sheet metals, it would be better to redefine some features made in a questionable way to maintain the structure of the sheet, which allows you for example to develop the model.
What with the step...nisba!
then you think that I am a free professional and it happens to me exactly the opposite of what happens to you, that is often they pass me assemblies to put back in place and with the parts with feature to redefine :tongue:
12 years of work on the solid edge should be seen somewhere, or not? :wink:

Yes, mine was only a personal consideration, I know well that if the model comes as it was designed I employ 1/10 of the time to change it, especially for the plates ( fortunately I don't have much to do), but as I said I had bad luck on the pieces and I tribulated from crazy to fix them that if I refaced them from scratch I took half time.