market share solid modelers

[morgan65]

where can you find information?

 

[re_solidworks]

where can you find information?

neutral nowhere, tendentious at every software dealer.:biggrin:

 

[PopeYe]

cimdata.com I think it's the most authoritative ... all cad and cam sites well or badly talk about it ... the only mole is that the data of the various reports are not free.
what you can read in the various sites of the software house is an interpretation usually a bit partisan of the data.

 

[morgan65]

thanks to all

 

[Matteo]

neutral nowhere, tendentious at every software dealer.:biggrin:

confermo! :wink:

 

[The_Matrix]

There is no unified answer.
It depends very much on the industrial sector you examine.
automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive
aerospace
Machinery
consumer goods
ship ship
Moldova&die
etc...
Also, the "trend" is important... I give you an example: space claim has definitely a market share resible compared to other industry majors, but its trend is definitely growing.
However, for example, the speech on osd: it is on the market from n lustri, but never really broke.

 

[cacciatorino]

There is no unified answer.
It depends very much on the industrial sector you examine.
automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive automotive
aerospace
Machinery
consumer goods
ship ship
Moldova&die
etc...
Also, the "trend" is important... I give you an example: space claim has definitely a market share resible compared to other industry majors, but its trend is definitely growing.
However, for example, the speech on osd: it is on the market from n lustri, but never really broke.

depends on how good the local salesman is, at least in small businesses: here' on the adriatic until recently solid edge was practically the standard for 3d, with significant presences of osd (people who migrated from me10) and think3 (grations from gbg), instead from what little I saw on the Tyrrhenian band goes much more solidworks.

probably the work done by engineering gave its fruit in the late 1990s until a few years ago.

 

[The_Matrix]

depends on how good the local salesman is, at least in small businesses: here' on the adriatic until recently solid edge was practically the standard for 3d, with significant presences of osd (people who migrated from me10) and think3 (grations from gbg), instead from what little I saw on the Tyrrhenian band goes much more solidworks.

probably the work done by engineering gave its fruit in the late 1990s until a few years ago.

Of course. You are perfectly right: retailer in medium/small businesses is very important.
You will see that in a little bit of edge on the Adriatic will have a little more diffusion... time to time.. .

 

[The_Matrix]

Of course. You are perfectly right: retailer in medium/small businesses is very important.
You will see that in a little bit of edge on the Adriatic will have a little more diffusion... time to time.. .

http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=19352

 

[cacciatorino]

http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=19352

competition (bears) also uses solid edge?

remaining at the link you mentioned, the text says that if-st was chosen to replace the existing cad, but what did they use before?

 

[The_Matrix]

competition (bears) also uses solid edge?

remaining at the link you mentioned, the text says that if-st was chosen to replace the existing cad, but what did they use before?

pro/e e se

 

[Matteo]

is not a statistic (I would not have the necessary numbers) but my customers (Milan area, bergamo, como with some exceptions in the bologna area and north-east) use big way (word of 3d): 25% proe, 25% swx, 20% se, 10% catia, 10% inventor, 10% others (nx, spaceclaim, cocreate, ...).
the sector is that of mechanics in the strict sense (no design, no aerospace).

 

[stef_design]

What do you think project is one of the most "getted"?

 

[Matteo]

What do you think project is one of the most "getted"?

according to me for various reasons:

1) compared to others has better efficiency with large assemblies and complex parts (more "light" we say)

2) excellent integration with fem (prom) with competitive costs for the proe+prom package

3) for those seeking "extreme" parameterization is still the reference point

4) in some areas (lombardy for example) the commercial network is very strong

 

[The_Matrix]

according to me for various reasons:

1) compared to others has better efficiency with large assemblies and complex parts (more "light" we say)

2) excellent integration with fem (prom) with competitive costs for the proe+prom package

3) for those seeking "extreme" parameterization is still the reference point

4) in some areas (lombardy for example) the commercial network is very strong

I would say rather than at the strategic moment of the exchange 2d>3d they were made ready with the best product.
They made a massacre of customers in the mid-1990s.
and, most customers, finding themselves well, continue to use it.

 

[mariuss.r]

I would say rather than at the strategic moment of the exchange 2d>3d they were made ready with the best product.
They made a massacre of customers in the mid-1990s.
and, most customers, finding themselves well, continue to use it.

quoto :smile: I'm one of those.