• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

automatic table setting

  • Thread starter Thread starter cisia
  • Start date Start date
I have entered enough into the world of carpentry and work for more than one company with solidworks. there is to say that I and a person of my confidence are developing a series of functions aimed at carpentry and optimization of the workflow of design of these structures with swx.
conforcing me with the cads of the field I noticed qualities and defects. my client has tekla and another has technometal and both are a lot more productive than me for standard constructions like sheds, etc...
the problem that they have concerns a little particular structures that must be built sometimes to satisfy architectural needs. from what I have seen is no longer a question of speed, just fail to realize the necessary tables, not to mention the export of step or iges for the laser cutting of the profiles.
basically on the "strane" structures are much more competitive I with swx than the various vertical cads.
Among other things I think that in my case there is still a lot of room to improve and many workshops to introduce to better optimize work with swx.
 
Salvatore_UT said:
Why bother you with inventor? definitely inventor is a great tool for mechanics but not for carpentry. test prosteel and I guarantee you as well as being dedicated to the automatic creation of the executive drawings of workshop and certainly much more powerful than technometal.

are available for any confron
Click to expand...
I am fully in agreement with how much you write, it is not the appropriate tool for carpentry, prosteel is definitely better.
technometal according to me is not even considered among the alternatives, it is a bad product, old and with the habit of being imprecise and approximate ...
 
ClaudioPerri said:
I am fully in agreement with how much you write, it is not the appropriate tool for carpentry, prosteel is definitely better.
technometal according to me is not even considered among the alternatives, it is a bad product, old and with the habit of being imprecise and approximate ...
Click to expand...
...my career unfortunately gives you reason. ...quote.
 
mapel said:
It is right who says that for carpentry there are better programs of invertor (I have seen demos of tekla for example), but for a carpentry linked to the structures of machines and plants, in which there are also standard profiles, but above all plates and plates can go well inventor or solidwork.
there is however the need to have the single forming machines and then order them by type and/or thickness for the plates and make nesting.
you can do well by hand, but with many parts it is necessary automatism "controlled".
Thank you. Mapel
Click to expand...
inventor was never intended as a modeler of architectural structures in iron. you will never find a demo of inventor that you mention in this. They simply never wanted it, those of the autodesk.
But if I need an iron structure on board the car......
 
cisia said:
Turning around the net I found something really interesting. . a .ivb file contain a really powerful macro series also for the creation of automatic idw by selecting directly the parts or subsets from a set... sin that I do not know the vb but I think that it is very little to be able to create a truly functional macro.

I attach the above file to allow everyone to view it:http://digilander.libero.it/cleps82/drawing%20samples.ivbthat maybe you can do something interesting!!!! :finger:
Click to expand...
obligatory premise: at the opening, the ivb file tells me that on my machine there are missing objects (recalled by the project file, evidently...).

tried with a 2010, I can say that many of these macros have already been inserted as standard commands. neither the masks, nor the most interesting macros (i.e. those that create the masses at the table and the quotas) work correctly. . :frown:

Well, at first glance, they don't seem very simple routines. :frown:
 
re_solidworks said:
I have entered enough into the world of carpentry and work for more than one company with solidworks. there is to say that I and a person of my confidence are developing a series of functions aimed at carpentry and optimization of the workflow of design of these structures with swx.
conforcing me with the cads of the field I noticed qualities and defects. my client has tekla and another has technometal and both are a lot more productive than me for standard constructions like sheds, etc...
the problem that they have concerns a little particular structures that must be built sometimes to satisfy architectural needs. from what I have seen is no longer a question of speed, just fail to realize the necessary tables, not to mention the export of step or iges for the laser cutting of the profiles.
basically on the "strane" structures are much more competitive I with swx than the various vertical cads.
Among other things I think that in my case there is still a lot of room to improve and many workshops to introduce to better optimize work with swx.
Click to expand...
king hc perfectly right with inventor go fast on mechanics and fatigue for what concerns carpentry with software type tekla or moveel is the reverse
 
Avoplus said:
obligatory premise: at the opening, the ivb file tells me that on my machine there are missing objects (recalled by the project file, evidently...).

tried with a 2010, I can say that many of these macros have already been inserted as standard commands. neither the masks, nor the most interesting macros (i.e. those that create the masses at the table and the quotas) work correctly. . :frown:

Well, at first glance, they don't seem very simple routines. :frown:
Click to expand...
the link attached to the post to which you refer does not work: I never noticed this thread and would like to see these macros. Can someone get me back on the net? Thank you!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 126 (members: 0, guests: 126)
Back
Top