it is true what you say but if one does not know how to use sw it is a little difficultfollow the construction procedure that takes place in reality.
How would they do that?
with work.
then extrude a cylinder and work with sweeps and circular sweep repetitions.
If I have understood well what are the gorges you need inclined, cut with sweep using a helical angle path of 30° and as a profile the section of the throat.it is true what you say but if one does not know how to use sw it is a little difficult
Anyway I managed to do this
but the gorges are radiated but straight instead in the photo are tilted 30 ° but propio can not help her? ?
in the propeller function I do not find how to give the inclination 30°If I have understood well what are the gorges you need inclined, cut with sweep using a helical angle path of 30° and as a profile the section of the throat.
all you can do then as circular repetitions, possibly guided by the sketch so you can use those functions to automatically repeat the components in the axieme (knives, shaves, lards, grains etc.)
set the propeller by step and revolution or by step and height then the step to set the revenues by calculating it from the angle (30°) of the desired propeller: step=pigreco*d*tan30 where d is the diameter of the circle from which the propeller revenuesin the propeller function I do not find how to give the inclination 30°
Sorry.
I opened it up. I'm in a hurry, but I saw you have a lot of geometry in the underdefinite sketches. If it's for a flight test you've done, it might even be there, otherwise that model is a wandering mine. depart from the first feature and bind everything well.I attach the design I tried to make I accept advice and criticism
Thank you.
can you give me some advice or even better to fix it even calmly so that you understand well?I opened it up. I'm in a hurry, but I saw you have a lot of geometry in the underdefinite sketches. If it's for a flight test you've done, it might even be there, otherwise that model is a wandering mine. depart from the first feature and bind everything well.
the best way is to get there and see "why" is subdefinitionOnce you understand, you automatically get out of the sketch only when all entities are black.can you give me some advice or even better to fix it even calmly so that you understand well?
If you fix it, someone and you reopen it doesn't learn a pipe and you can't figure out what was done. do as mike told you and make all the sketches completely defined.can you give me some advice or even better to fix it even calmly so that you understand well?
I can make all the sketches defined except the 19th block me sw how come? ?the best way is to get there and see "why" is subdefinitionOnce you understand, you automatically get out of the sketch only when all entities are black.
to make you understand: sketch2 : add equality report (=) to segments
that start from the origin, once you do that you will have only the 15 mm sement
to which you will have to add a quota (60) to make the sketch totally defined.
read the topic I posted to you, it's the basis for not having big problems
as the piece gets complicated. :finger:
in doing these operations I highly recommend you to drag the Insert barup to the first processing.
by hand the transfer to the next processing.
repeat procedures for subsequent sketches you used for ,sweep, sweep cuts etc.
I understand what you're saying, but if someone like you does it, I'd understand how to build my tools.If you fix it, someone and you reopen it doesn't learn a pipe and you can't figure out what was done. do as mike told you and make all the sketches completely defined.
then for cutting along the helid we see, in the meantime you can do tests on any cylinder to hang you and understand how to guide everything.
That is a hallucinating sketch: eek: I made the automatic definition because I didn't intend to go crazy to define it as you did it and it took almost two minutes but eventually defined it. see image imageI can make all the sketches defined except the 19th block me sw how come? ?
I understand what you're saying, but it's gonna take so much time to get that frickin' back.I understand what you're saying, but if someone like you does it, I'd understand how to build my tools.
make a plan on the vertical edge, draw the profile of the material to be removed and make a cut "to the surface by selecting the arrival surface.For example, I used a method of cabbage, creating a bevel on the face to do the tilted inserts at 30°.
I did as you told me to start overThat is a hallucinating sketch: eek: I made the automatic definition because I didn't intend to go crazy to define it as you did it and it took almost two minutes but eventually defined it. see image image
imho you can't really shape that way. You have to do simple sketches and make sense for what you have to build after. you could make a clove looks like 1/5 of the cutter (has 5 cutting edges, 5 drains etc) with all or almost processing then make a single circular repetition.
It's hard to advise you because you know how the tool has to be done. thinking in terms of traditional mechanical processing can also go well but you do not have to overdo it. you have to take advantage of the characteristics of the cad that allow you to reduce the work by repeating, mirroring, sharing etc. do not make one for every step you do in the workshop.. .
... and there is reason: you can't repeat cuts if there's nothing to cut!I did as you told me to start over
I attach the new file, now I only worked on a snitch but with extrusion 6-9 (if I don't remember badly) doesn't make me repeat circularp.s. for reasons of the customer are not + 5 ears but 8
wait for your advice
because as Mike said, he finds nothing. . .I did as you told me to start over
I attach the new file, now I have only worked on a clove but with extrusion 6-9 (if I don't remember bad) it doesn't make me do the circular repetition
for how you destroyed that frieze, especially in the first version, making that change would become a mess. you will see in the video that I simply connected the number of feature repetitions with the angular value of the cutting edge. change that and rebuild the frieze.p.s. for reasons of the customer are not + 5 ears but 8