photoview360 on 2011: but how does c..avolo start?

[reggio]

:36_1_28::36_1_15::36_1_10: ...
in 2010, there was his icon that just pressed and (often) worked. . .
... in 2011... but why... integrated icons... (singing I dry my mouth) I'm getting grigettes?

 

[controllofiamma]

Hello
The question may seem obvious, but did you check pw360 in the additions?

Hi.

 

[reggio]

Hello
The question may seem obvious, but did you check pw360 in the additions?

Hi.

....I thought so, now I realize that for:
3d instant web site
featuring work
♪
the popup describing what I am, puts the tip of the "fumetto" above the check that does not make me reach it from the mouse click.. .
And how do I move the pop up? ♪

 

[Mike1967]

....I thought so, now I realize that for:
3d instant web site
featuring work
♪
the popup describing what I am, puts the tip of the "fumetto" above the check that does not make me reach it from the mouse click.. .
And how do I move the pop up? ♪

Reggio, don't take it, but you can't have a problem even
click on a caselline... and try to move the mouse to the right
or move the "add" window to the right side of the monitor... Come on, it's a party, don't re-live your day. It is enough to overcome these skemata.
Unfortunately rest of the idea that solidworks you don't like, so either you
suitable or software changes.
for example I suffer from hives only to feel to appoint autocad (no, I did not wrong to scive), so also sympathy towards a sw has its weight.
However, I find that the integrated pw360 is a kagata
crazy, before it was easier to use and even more intuitive, independent from the primary softare such as solidworks.
you could create render without having to open solidworks and the options, simple also for a rock like me, they facilitated not little work.
I believe you will find many problems using this application.

 

[controllofiamma]

Hi.
I have been using pw360 for a few days, before using an external rendering engine to sw, but there were pros and cons.
I have never used external pw360 to sw but seeing some tutorials, it seems to me that the possibilities offered by the integration of the engine are discreet.
definitely the thing that misses the most is a decent online guide and this penalizes the product a bit.

Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

Hi.
I have been using pw360 for a few days, before using an external rendering engine to sw, but there were pros and cons.
I have never used external pw360 to sw but seeing some tutorials, it seems to me that the possibilities offered by the integration of the engine are discreet.
definitely the thing that misses the most is a decent online guide and this penalizes the product a bit.

Hi.

Look, I used 360 a lot and the ease with which satisfactory results were obtained was really amazing, much more than you did "outside"
from the solidworks interface.
now is much more slender, the direct itegration in the sw breaks the bales a bit.
it is true that for the moment I have not done a great deal of that, but especially the settings are not rendered to duty, always remain blurred and not
meet my expectations.
I have a colleague who is very hard on this topic, in fact he uses way (that is the motor of 360 if not erro) than other is that photoview 360 however
with all available options.
I repeat, before it was more intuitive and quick.
after place some make created with the version 2009/2010.

 

[Mike1967]

below the classic example of rendering to show the customer turn
look will have its 500 litre pool cabbage with ns parapetto.
Here, in this case, the problem is that if you're doing the reder, or at least
you are fixing various aspects, if you inadvertently move the object into the side file,
the work done so far.
with the 360 stand alone positions the object and you do not have to take care of what you are doing in the part or together. even it is not necessary to open solidworks.
I'm not convinced of this new way of using the photoview.

 

[sampom]

below the classic example of rendering to show the customer turn
look will have its 500 litre pool cabbage with ns parapetto.
Here, in this case, the problem is that if you're doing the reder, or at least
you are fixing various aspects, if you inadvertently move the object into the side file,
the work done so far.
with the 360 stand alone positions the object and you do not have to take care of what you are doing in the part or together. even it is not necessary to open solidworks.
I'm not convinced of this new way of using the photoview.

♪

..certain that if the tank fills it with beer (if they discover a couple the 2 in the photo) the parapet serves little:biggrin::biggrin:

I share and share what you say about the use of pv360; definitely more convenient and immediate when it was independent (I will also have installed the old version outside the program).

greetings
Mar

 

[Mike1967]

Dude!

..certain that if the tank fills it with beer (if they discover a couple the 2 in the photo) the parapet serves little:biggrin::biggrin:

quoto and share what you say about the use the pv360; definitely more convenient and immediate when it was independent (I will also keep the old version installed outside the program).

Hello
marco

thinks that the mail is just a small example of what architects and private customers ask us...

You don't do anything if you use sw 2011... like me:frown:

 

[sampom]

You don't do anything if you use sw 2011... like me:frown:

I haven't tried yet.
say that the "old" photoview does not open the files of swx 2011?

greetings
Mar

 

[sampom]

I haven't tried yet.
say that the "old" photoview does not open the files of swx 2011?

greetings
Mar

I tried. No, it doesn't open them. either step or other interchange formats.

then every pv opens solo swx formats of the same version (or back)?
I thought it might be a "universal" program.

greetings
Mar

 

[Mike1967]

I tried. No, it doesn't open them. either step or other interchange formats.

then every pv opens solo swx formats of the same version (or back)?
I thought it might be a "universal" program.

greetings
Mar

Unfortunately it is so... :frown:
we are evaluating the purchase of mode which is very similar to pw360 but with all available options. (pw360 comes from that... )

 

[reggio]

Reggio, don't take it, but you can't have a problem even
click on a caselline... and try to move the mouse to the right
or move the "add" window to the right side of the monitor... Come on, it's a party, don't re-live your day. It is enough to overcome these skemata.

mike, you know I'm sorry, but instead I take it because with softw I can have problems even just to click at the right point of a casellina.. .
moving to right or left the window also moved the popup, which, unlike other popups, occupied practically all the casellin leaving only 6 pixels free that to catch them I had to hire a sniper... :wink:

 

[Mike1967]

mike, you know I'm sorry, but instead I take it because with softw I can have problems even just to click at the right point of a casellina.. .
moving to right or left the window also moved the popup, which, unlike other popups, occupied practically all the casellin leaving only 6 pixels free that to catch them I had to hire a sniper... :wink:

If it happens to you, it works on screen resolution... It's an idea.
But try not to harm!

 

[reggio]

ot: when I launch a 2011 rendering, swx says:
"for a more realistic rendering, it goes to the perspective view.. .
click view/show/...."

I see it, but then it shows I don't see it... Where am I wrong?
[edit: ah... inoltre se lancio un render di un assieme che ha più di 2 pezzi in croce... PV360 2011 Sp0.0 và in blocco "NON RISPONDE"...
su I7 920 2.67Ghz ram6gb win7x64 + nvidia quadro1800+driver certificati scaricati ieri ... che fare? ]

 

[Mike1967]

ot: when I launch a 2011 rendering, swx says:
"for a more realistic rendering, it goes to the perspective view.. .
click view/show/...."

I see it, but then it shows I don't see it... Where am I wrong?

hi reggio, it's a pleasure to read back... :biggrin:

You have three options to choose. . .

Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

[edit: ah... inoltre se lancio un render di un assieme che ha più di 2 pezzi in croce... PV360 2011 Sp0.0 và in blocco "NON RISPONDE"...
su I7 920 2.67Ghz ram6gb win7x64 + nvidia quadro1800+driver certificati scaricati ieri ... What to do? ]

I suggest you upgrade to the sp2, the sp0 is a bowl.

ps: note the chain rendered in my avatar, rendered with
keyshot.. .
I'm letting it go, there's no sync between what you see.
in the preview and the final rendering.
too many settings that repeat unnecessarily making you miss a lot of time.
before it was "better". ..frown:

 

[lelepanz]

I suggest you upgrade to the sp2, the sp0 is a bowl.

ps: note the chain rendered in my avatar, rendered with
keyshot.. .
I'm letting it go, there's no sync between what you see.
in the preview and the final rendering.
too many settings that repeat unnecessarily making you miss a lot of time.
before it was "better". ..frown:

I take advantage of it to intervene and say my opinion too.
I don't find myself a... with integrated pv360. :
I'd love to know what you had.
among other things to the presentation of pv360 and sw2010 the sw guys had also said:
"look at how beautiful you can make rendering outside the same apllication of sw"! !


before it was so beautiful.... among other things I started using the renderings just with the pv360. not that I need an object identical to the realm... but to me it was okay. Now I find it really hostical.

keyshot ... aimè ... is too expensive for what we have to do.
You know if there's something open? Usually in this area (general review) of "software" by small pushers usually find ... but ... bo??? ?

 

[SolidUser]

I take advantage of it to intervene and say my opinion too.
I don't find myself a... with integrated pv360. :
I'd love to know what you had.
among other things to the presentation of pv360 and sw2010 the sw guys had also said:
"look at how beautiful you can make rendering outside the same apllication of sw"! !


before it was so beautiful.... among other things I started using the renderings just with the pv360. not that I need an object identical to the realm... but to me it was okay. Now I find it really hostical.

keyshot ... aimè ... is too expensive for what we have to do.
You know if there's something open? Usually in this area (general review) of "software" by small pushers usually find ... but ... bo??? ?

1) performance improved
2) is also native to 64bit
3) there is complete integration with sw dovi you can see in real-time changes
4) you can save 'appareances'
5) remains a separate component, in fact the process is distinct from sw

you are not people who only render, hence the request to have a distinct program.
you are designers who want to create realistic images of your projects, so in my opinion you do not understand everything.

 

[Mike1967]

1) performance improved
2) is also native to 64bit
3) there is complete integration with sw dovi you can see in real-time changes
4) you can save 'appareances'
5) remains a separate component, in fact the process is distinct from sw

you are not people who only render, hence the request to have a distinct program.
you are designers who want to create realistic images of your projects, so In my opinion you have not made it clear..

bè, personal opinion.

We are incompetent, what you want to do, I just say that first in 5 minutes
give various materials, colors and dances, now to verify that the material, color,
Lighting consistent with the preview comes the measles.
no is from a day I use it to render, especially that of swx.
Blessed are you learned.

These are made with 2009.. In five minutes, I was running.