photoview360 on 2011: but how does c..avolo start?

[SolidUser]

I hope you put us down, I want to see and evaluate. I saw videos made with 3dstudio that go far beyond what I saw in fact with swx+motion.
motion was not born to do "cinema" but to extract data (such as adams) and for that I would use it, it does not seem optimized to extract yarns in rendering. Maybe I'm wrong and I'm gonna be disappointed by 3dstudio, but the videos rendered with swx seem too heavy.
if then I have to hold a license only for this with a premium you buy almost 3dstudio licenses (3900 a list).

It is true that solidworks motion is not born for this purpose and I have not even mentioned it or recommended it.
The classic animations are good, in my opinion.
I don't know what kind of cinema you have to do, but also big companies make small movies in opengl or with low quality rendering with the only animation.
see you... I think it was a waste of time and resources.
we, if we ever have movies from movies, we rely on external companies that only do that.
for me the designer has to devote himself to the projects and has enough.

 

[Mike1967]

Do I have a video?
Can't you type the command creates a table?
when you were in 2010 you were able to make rendering and table better than now?
How did you do if you had the same priorities on the cpu?
Do you understand my speech?

as promised. . .
See if you can give me directions, I'm still there.

 

[re_solidworks]

It is true that solidworks motion is not born for this purpose and I have not even mentioned it or recommended it.
The classic animations are good, in my opinion.
I don't know what kind of cinema you have to do, but also big companies make small movies in opengl or with low quality rendering with the only animation.
see you... I think it was a waste of time and resources.
we, if we ever have movies from movies, we rely on external companies that only do that.
for me the designer has to devote himself to the projects and has enough.

the fact is that I am an outsider and I recently inserted within my studio a person who will do that and other concerning graphics, presentations, etc...
for this swx I go "straight" for this task.
Maybe if I have already made a layout I will export to step and then I will work the video in 3ds.

 

[SolidUser]

the fact is that I am an outsider and I recently inserted within my studio a person who will do that and other concerning graphics, presentations, etc...
for this swx I go "straight" for this task.
Maybe if I have already made a layout I will export to step and then I will work the video in 3ds.

Maybe you're tight or maybe you can use it little.
I saw spectacular animations made with sw.
Did you see the 9/11 animation where a boing crashes into the white house?
You have a satisfactory program.
instead of spending 3000 euros, because you don't buy a book from 75 euros that explains how to use animator without having to export etc.
Trust me, you just have to earn us.

 

[re_solidworks]

Maybe you're tight or maybe you can use it little.
I saw spectacular animations made with sw.
Did you see the 9/11 animation where a boing crashes into the white house?
You have a satisfactory program.
instead of spending 3000 euros, because you don't buy a book from 75 euros that explains how to use animator without having to export etc.
Trust me, you just have to earn us.

definitely succeeding in optimizing the profit of its investments is necessary. As for me if I knew how to use in an excellent animated way maybe it would suffice.
At the moment I did one day of motion education to be able to do fast motion studies (which cost me little) and allow me to arrive in a few minutes to the sizing of engines, brakes, springs, etc... in cases where you get by hand (or with excel) to the result takes too much time.
for example to calculate a commuter motion I have a sheet excel of about 400 lines that works based on energy balances.
a better result is obtainable in 5 minutes of motion and of this I am satisfied. I've never been worried about improving my video exposure and I'd like to do it, regardless of 3dsmax.
Keep in mind that these videos would still be made by another person and therefore I would still need another license and premium ribs a tot.
use the second activation simultaneously is not regular and I do not intend to commit irregularities.
This means that while my motion processes 2 days I scratch myself... I don't think so!
In any case, I could try to refine my motion knowledge and throw recalculations on the weekend.
What book do you mean in your post? is that provided by the dealer?

 

[Mike1967]

as promised. . .
See if you can give me directions, I'm still there.

I wait for feedback from those who downloaded the file....:redface:

 

[SolidUser]

Keep in mind that these videos would still be made by another person and therefore I would still need another license and premium ribs a tot.

animator is in the basic version of solidworks.
You don't need cinematic analysis.
for the book, there is that of the solidworks corp., which can be purchased by dealer or not, I don't know, or look on amazon.
search for those clearly of sw2011, even if you are not there yet, with the SP3 you will go... I hope so.

 

[Mike1967]

Do I have a video?
Can't you type the command creates a table?
when you were in 2010 you were able to make rendering and table better than now?
How did you do if you had the same priorities on the cpu?
Do you understand my speech?

Can you answer my question?
I did the video, but you quit, how come?
I wonder what you're looking for... :36_6_3:

 

[Mike1967]

Here, I made a video where I show you how 2010 works:
I can put in the table without problems, instead with 2011 no! (in the sense that it does not allow you!)
I hope I've been clear.
I'm not talking about performance, but about the impossibility of being able to do it with the
2011...
compare the two videos and then draw the conclusions.
attached video.

 

[SolidUser]

Here, I made a video where I show you how 2010 works:
I can put in the table without problems, instead with 2011 no! (in the sense that it does not allow you!)
I hope I've been clear.
I'm not talking about performance, but about the impossibility of being able to do it with the
2011...
compare the two videos and then draw the conclusions.
attached video.

I wanted to write it down for a long time, but I never checked and so I couldn't.
I did it now and I like it.
with 2011 and the preview set all your aspects, lights and scenography.
the preview is nothing but pv2011 working without its toolbar.
If the result you like, set the final rendering options and then click on schedula rendering with date one minute later.
keep doing what you have to do and after a while you find the image ready.
times are lower for those at a 64-bit compared to 2010 which was a 32-bit.
So I think it's better.

 

[Mike1967]

I wanted to write it down for a long time, but I never checked and so I couldn't.
I did it now and I like it.
with 2011 and the preview set all your aspects, lights and scenography.
the preview is nothing but pv2011 working without its toolbar.
If the result you like, set the final rendering options and then click on schedula rendering with date one minute later.
keep doing what you have to do and after a while you find the image ready.
times are lower for those at a 64-bit compared to 2010 which was a 32-bit.
So I think it's better.

of this I had already noticed in the first days (tempted the schedulation.. by curiosity), but I do not see why it should not be possible to do so even when
I think in the next few days they're gonna fix this.
Hi.