mirroring in swx 2011

[re_solidworks]

Bye to all,

I'm still using 2010, but yesterday I saw a strangeness on a pc of a colleague with whom I was connected via teamviewer.
I sent a 3d model made by me in 2010 and this model contained a mirroring together. in this mirror there were no particular mirrors (lefts).
the colleague called me saying that I had not correctly placed some elements (those mirrored) and connecting I saw that swx put the left pieces in an incorrect position.
I tried to eliminate the mirrors (after various edicts gone wrong) and kept wrong the position of the elements. This is not the orientation, precisely the position in space.
Did I get a weird case, or does it happen to you? I should go to 2011 (they ask me) and I wouldn't start impregnating from the first day....

I thank all those who will be interested.

 

[Mike1967]

Bye to all,

I'm still using 2010, but yesterday I saw a strangeness on a pc of a colleague with whom I was connected via teamviewer.
I sent a 3d model made by me in 2010 and this model contained a mirroring together. in this mirror there were no particular mirrors (lefts).
the colleague called me saying that I had not correctly placed some elements (those mirrored) and connecting I saw that swx put the left pieces in an incorrect position.
I tried to eliminate the mirrors (after various edicts gone wrong) and kept wrong the position of the elements. This is not the orientation, precisely the position in space.
Did I get a weird case, or does it happen to you? I should go to 2011 (they ask me) and I wouldn't start impregnating from the first day....

I thank all those who will be interested.

Can you make a joint with me?
in three months of use I did not find that problem.

Hi.

 

[re_solidworks]

Can you make a joint with me?
in three months of use I did not find that problem.

Hi.

hello mike and thanks for the interest. This already comforts me, if you use the mirrors of assemblies and you have not found the problem I think that something of that aid is not digested well by solidworks, but I can think of it as a limited problem.
the original axieme I can not post it and to realize an example ad hoc I have to install 2011.
apart from this you have to see if I can reproduce the problem. yesterday I saw little as I was remotely and the line was very slow, it turns out there was a little clogged.
I think tomorrow I install it on a workstation to test a couple of days and then I will pass to 2011....
I'm going a little bit, how are you with 2011? do you have problems apart from the photoview you don't like?

 

[Mike1967]

hello mike and thanks for the interest. This already comforts me, if you use the mirrors of assemblies and you have not found the problem I think that something of that aid is not digested well by solidworks, but I can think of it as a limited problem.
the original axieme I can not post it and to realize an example ad hoc I have to install 2011.
apart from this you have to see if I can reproduce the problem. yesterday I saw little as I was remotely and the line was very slow, it turns out there was a little clogged.
I think tomorrow I install it on a workstation to test a couple of days and then I will pass to 2011....
I'm going a little bit, how are you with 2011? do you have problems apart from the photoview you don't like?

to take away my doubt I tried to take shaky files built with 2009 and 2010, reopening them with 2011 I did not have your probe.
What's wrong with you?

regarding 2011, it is not bad, but compared to what they say it is lighter and blah blah blah.... Let's leave it, though, it's a good version.
I only hope to fix some things like the bug in the "sheet converts" and some views on the designs that if you are not sleeping molds half design...:biggrin:
In this period I am learning how to use the list of materials and cutting parts, it seems to me that those work very well and, after repeated checks, I can trust cutting measures and their angles inserted automatically.
the pv did not value it for "known position".
I found a supposed bug: pack and go.
if you are in a folder, from win, with the preview display activated,
the p&g operation does not go well if you want to include drawings.
this makes it if you select "flat view" (if I don't remember bad) and visualization
preview in win folders...
other alleged bug is what on certain occasions, perhaps changing some sketches, some odds are "rovesciate" on the opposite side creating not few problems.

I expected heavier improvements on functions that exist for years.

 

[re_solidworks]

to take away my doubt I tried to take shaky files built with 2009 and 2010, reopening them with 2011 I did not have your probe.
What's wrong with you?

regarding 2011, it is not bad, but compared to what they say it is lighter and blah blah blah.... Let's leave it, though, it's a good version.
I only hope to fix some things like the bug in the "sheet converts" and some views on the designs that if you are not sleeping molds half design...:biggrin:
In this period I am learning how to use the list of materials and cutting parts, it seems to me that those work very well and, after repeated checks, I can trust cutting measures and their angles inserted automatically.
the pv did not value it for "known position".
I found a supposed bug: pack and go.
if you are in a folder, from win, with the preview display activated,
the p&g operation does not go well if you want to include drawings.
this makes it if you select "flat view" (if I don't remember bad) and visualization
preview in win folders...
other alleged bug is what on certain occasions, perhaps changing some sketches, some odds are "rovesciate" on the opposite side creating not few problems.

I expected heavier improvements on functions that exist for years.

hi mike, I checked while I was connected to the service pack and it was 2.0. I don't know, on 2010 everything was ok, I sent it and they started the problems. In any case, if you opened files without problems, I think it was something related to that witness.
I don't want it to be related to my way of working, but I'll do more tests first on my car before I pass the whole install.
I stayed at this passage since 2010 reached the maximum maturation and the unresolved basins are known and therefore predictable, changing release starts again. I'm extremely pressed right now, I have a huge amount of work to do and I can't afford to spend unnecessary time.
Thank you again, now I try to test my car and then we see the results, I let you know. . .

hello and good weekend

 

[SolidUser]

hi mike, I checked while I was connected to the service pack and it was 2.0. I don't know, on 2010 everything was ok, I sent it and they started the problems. In any case, if you opened files without problems, I think it was something related to that witness.
I don't want it to be related to my way of working, but I'll do more tests first on my car before I pass the whole install.
I stayed at this passage since 2010 reached the maximum maturation and the unresolved basins are known and therefore predictable, changing release starts again. I'm extremely pressed right now, I have a huge amount of work to do and I can't afford to spend unnecessary time.
Thank you again, now I try to test my car and then we see the results, I let you know. . .

hello and good weekend

support for 2010 is finished.
I recommend you switch to 2011 with the release of the SP3 that is imminent.
a spike on the performance inserted in the SP3 on pv2011.

 

[Mike1967]

support for 2010 is finished.
I recommend you switch to 2011 with the release of the SP3 that is imminent.a spike on performance inserted in the SP3 on pv2011.

Yes, almost as keyshot....:tongue:

more than performance I would like a match between what you see in the window and what it makes... at the moment are two very different things.

 

[SolidUser]

Yes, almost as keyshot....:tongue:

more than performance I would like a match between what you see in the window and what it makes... at the moment are two very different things.

How do you say I'm very much different.
pv is he who works both in preview and in the final.
There are options that are not calculated in preview and for obvious performance reasons as it was in 2010.
but for the rest it is very reliable.

 

[re_solidworks]

I'm interested in photoview, but to some point. First of all I would like to be able to model and put on the table without falling into the usual youth defects that in the last versions have literally made me mad.
with 2010 I found just peace with serving pack 4.0 and 2.0 would seem a little acerbo.
However, as I said, I should pass otherwise I would find difficulties in communication with a collaborator.

 

[Mike1967]

How do you say I'm very much different.
pv is he who works both in preview and in the final.
There are options that are not calculated in preview and for obvious performance reasons as it was in 2010.but for the rest it is very reliable.

The bales, Friday I had to lose half an hour to put a caxxo of photos as a background and apply a fig@ of gate to show the customer!
Look, let me stay on this topic, I know more than I can write... Since 1999 it has been instrumental with the renders.. .

edit: half an hour only to "centre" object 3d with photo....

 

[SolidUser]

Look, let me stay on this topic, I know more than I can write. . . is since 1999 that struso with the renders...

great your experience on rendering.
I'm sorry, just a curiosity, this making with pv2010, you tell me what material that muretto is made?
I hope you didn't hand it over to the customer this render, because otherwise your fame could vacillate.:biggrin:
I also put the face as required by the rotten exile.

 

[sampom]

... you tell me what material that's made?...
I also put the face as required by the rotten exile.

..but of course porcelain stuffed with real goose down:biggrin:

but please come.. .

...but go, go. .

greetings
Marco:smile:

Eppoi, esimio acchì?

 

[Mike1967]

great your experience on rendering.
I'm sorry, just a curiosity, this making with pv2010, you tell me what material that muretto is made?
I hope you didn't hand it over to the customer this render, because otherwise Your fame could vacillate.:biggrin:
I also put the face as required by the rotten exile.

I have already explained, more than once, that the render I do it only and exclusively to make "see" to the architect of turn (who does not understand a mechanical drawing bat.. And I'm not kidding.
He doesn't care if the cement is polished, but he realizes well how our work will be.
However, trustworthy, in Swiss, where I work, are able to mirror even walls, trust me.
ps: I think so much you have to increase the number of faces per post.... arrival
I'm going to saturate.

ps-2: My fame in canton ticino is well known, trust me.. and not for "merit" of the renders. azz are finished the faces... .

ps3- for your info that is the cement "bagnato" of soliworks.... in fact the day I made that render (with the beloved 2010) rained that God sent it... finished face laughing.. .

 

[SolidUser]

I have already explained, more than once, that the render I do it only and exclusively to make "see" to the architect of turn (who does not understand a mechanical drawing bat.. And I'm not kidding.
He doesn't care if the cement is polished, but he realizes well how our work will be.
However, trustworthy, in Swiss, where I work, are able to mirror even walls, trust me.
ps: I think so much you have to increase the number of faces per post.... arrival
I'm going to saturate.

ps-2: My fame in canton ticino is well known, trust me.. and not for "merit" of the renders. azz are finished the faces... .

ps3- for your info that is the cement "bagnato" of soliworks.... in fact the day I made that render (with the beloved 2010) rained that God sent it... finished face laughing.. .

Let's do something....delete a file and make a rendering...you with keyshot or your beloved pv2010 and I with pv2011.
the results we attach them here.

 

[Mike1967]

No, don't mind if it turns out you're good at that...:biggrin:

 

[re_solidworks]

Can you make a joint with me?
in three months of use I did not find that problem.

Hi.

Hi, mike.

I tried 2011 on a laptop and the problem is there. I opened the axieme, lifted the insertion bar up above the mirrors and then lowered it. from that moment on, I couldn't put the pieces in place with the mirror. Can you try on your own together to lift and lower the insert bar?

Hello and thank you.

 

[Mike1967]

Hi, mike.

I tried 2011 on a laptop and the problem is there. I opened the axieme, lifted the insertion bar up above the mirrors and then lowered it. from that moment on, I couldn't put the pieces in place with the mirror. Can you try on your own together to lift and lower the insert bar?

Hello and thank you.

Look at the video, tell me if you do this.
I also tried with a very "more substantial" (90 pz).

 

[re_solidworks]

Look at the video, tell me if you do this.
I also tried with a very "more substantial" (90 pz).

Hi.

the mirrored parts and axioms are correct, it is their positioning in the space that is not symmetrical but wrong.
I tried on other assemblies (also complicated) and the problem is not there.
what I find strange is that it is a set created 10 days ago with the 2010 sp 5.
I don't think I'm gonna have to report it to the assistance..
for the moment I solve by removing the mirrors and putting some repetitions, I have always done without mirroring until 2010 and I rearrange myself without problems, only I shake and not little.
when I get an answer from the assistance I will post their motivations....

Hello and thank you again.