challenge cam to comparison

[Paolo.M]

This type of processing, many cams have been doing it for several years.
try to farm it on multiple surfaces without containment profile and with the tangency tool outside the surfaces, and perhaps with a "bucata" surface where the tool floats in the vacuum following the course of the surface of origin. of course without the use of containment profiles.
I've known him since 1997.
Hi.www.dharma-engineering.it

 

[Baloo]

This type of processing, many cams have been doing it for several years.
try to farm it on multiple surfaces without containment profile and with the tangency tool outside the surfaces, and perhaps with a "bucata" surface where the tool floats in the vacuum following the course of the surface of origin. of course without the use of containment profiles.
I've known him since 1997.
Hi.www.dharma-engineering.it

hi paolo, in fact this processing I use since I have this cam in company (visi13 if I do not err 5 years ago), but I do not know how to tell you since the first I lived the introduced.. .
I think I didn't understand your "test", since the iso performed it on your "part005.igs" file (surface with "hole") without containment profiles and following the surface performance... :biggrin:

 

[ilmuffo]

some quick exercise done with mastercam x5 ...:biggrin:

 

[RS4]

some quick exercise done with mastercam x5 ...:biggrin:

Hello muff....

in the image 2 I see too many lifts try to make only one continuous inlet attack and floating on the cutout without raising both to 0° that has 45° :smile:


Hi.

♪

 

[ilmuffo]

Hello muff....

in the image 2 I see too many lifts try to make only one continuous inlet attack and floating on the cutout without raising both to 0° that has 45° :smile:


Hi.

♪

hi rs4:tongue:
I'll try as soon as I can, mastercam is a cam that I've been underhand for a few days, I know him very little yet... but from the first impressions it gives me the feeling of being really powerful!
as soon as I return my hand to the exercise I will post the result according to your advice. :wink:

 

[ilmuffo]

I took some time... Here she is!

 

[Teto71]

hello to all

I just signed up and this is my first message
use as a proe modeler and as cam toptron
I find this very interesting thread and I would like to know if I can post a file of a mold (copper material at the beryllium) for the gravity casting of the brass

I would like to know the work you would do to make this mold.

Thank you.

 

[RS4]

hello and welcome teto

Having just joined, I recommend you read the forum rules and submit to the forum cam forum generale http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/forumdisplay.php?f=35 ,or pro\e being a user of the same

for all the rest you can post all the mathematicians you consider to post for any technical aid and exchange of views :biggrin:

greetings

♪

 

[Teto71]

hello and welcome teto

Having just joined, I recommend you read the forum rules and submit to the forum cam forum generale http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/forumdisplay.php?f=35 ,or pro\e being a user of the same

for all the rest you can post all the mathematicians you consider to post for any technical aid and exchange of views :biggrin:

greetings

♪

Hello

thank you 1000 x welcome, I immediately go to read the rules and to make a short presentation. I see that this forum is very active and that's exactly what I was looking for... available to exchange your opinions/experiences. . .of course I will try to contribute also me and return!

a good weekend to all! :finger:

 

[ilmuffo]

I want to propose you a special case:

finishing of a particular of a mold, underlay: machine (and cam) with 3 axes, disk tool.

How do other cams behave? How would you do that? :biggrin:

 

[RS4]

I want to propose you a special case:

finishing of a particular of a mold, underlay: machine (and cam) with 3 axes, disk tool.

How do other cams behave? How would you do that? :biggrin:

Hello the muffo

I would do a workmanship with past constants in z as you have also done processing problems I do not see :tongue:, I would give as upper floor and lower floor for limits gray surface, ridge processing tolerance 0.02mm, then I would do to work on 0.2mm constants per level z...... I don't know the material though!!!

ti allego file iges of the tool path, video files demo and images:biggrin:

What's wrong with you? ?


Hi.

♪

 

[ilmuffo]

What's wrong with you? ?

No one...

in fact I used your own settings. I was curious, however, to see the other cams because I knew that some cannot manage the subsquadra in this type of 3 axle work. so, I was interested in seeing what other solutions were possible. :biggrin:

 

[RS4]

No one...

in fact I used your own settings. I was curious, however, to see the other cams because I knew that some cannot manage the subsquadra in this type of 3 axle work. so, I was interested in seeing what other solutions were possible. :biggrin:

I don't think other cams fail to achieve this type of work

we wait for other colleagues with other cams!!!! ! !

 

[bulinorotto]

Hi.
powermill present!
can do qs processing 3 axes in different ways:
- z constant + subsquadra option
- pattern
- line projection


I

 

[RS4]

Hi.
powermill present!
can do qs processing 3 axes in different ways:
- z constant + subsquadra option
- pattern
- line projection


I

if you can show us what it does would be better for users too.

But I'm telling you what catia does.

in catia there is the standard possibility that is the one that I prefer processing in z 3assi

you can operate it in
- Not yet. distance between past and ridge height
-via ridge height: distance on the contour, minimum distance between past and ridge height
-distance on the contour: distance on the tangent contour, minimum distance between past and ridge height

for each strategy you can add:

-remove the parts undercut horizontal slope max by setting the angle
- hsm milling setting the minimum radius of the tool path necessary to get the angles


greetings

♪

 

[Stefano Vezzani]

Hello everyone
I have seen the challenge and a very interesting thing, if I can fit into your tests, I will train you the path I have made with topsolid'cam

 

[RS4]

Hello everyone
I have seen the challenge and a very interesting thing, if I can fit into your tests, I will train you the path I have made with topsolid'cam

welcome stefano :biggrin:

lacked solid top to the appeal, I heard about it well!!!! !

if you can illustrate your step processing and strategies

If you want you can post something interesting as a challenge, or repeat the tests already performed.


Hi.

♪

 

[cimaguy]

workmanship made with trousers. local-3x parallel past option

 

[RS4]

Hello everyone
I have seen the challenge and a very interesting thing, if I can fit into your tests, I will train you the path I have made with topsolid'cam

workmanship made with trousers. local-3x parallel past option

ok guys however let's try to make it more constructive discussion by adding more information with pictures we do very little this applies to all colleagues

we add the types of processing "strategies" of the used cams, materials, processing tolerances the approaching inputs etc... constructive criticism and other

I trust in your mileage in this regard

greetings

♪

 

[Stefano Vezzani]

hi, I turn you off as I did in topcam, I defintio in toptool, which and the tool database of topcam, the tool defining the ingombs and the radius of the tool included the stamp of the stem not to heel and then I applied the finishing cycle in subsqadro with a z step of 0.2 without limiting for profiles. I've just put a limit on my own to stop on the floor.

in the coming days I send you the paths on the pieces you have already made