conversion into sheet metal

[xxfast]

Hello, everyone.
I imported filres makes pro-e in sat format. and then I opened them with solidworks 2011 and converted into sheet metal with its bending, so as to get the sheet metal developments.
I don't understand why I can't convert the attached file to sheet.
Am I wrong?
Does anyone help me?
Thank you.

 

[Mike1967]

Hello, everyone.
I imported filres makes pro-e in sat format. and then I opened them with solidworks 2011 and converted into sheet metal with its bending, so as to get the sheet metal developments.
I don't understand why I can't convert the attached file to sheet.Am I wrong?Does anyone help me?
Thank you.

unproportioned bent rays. (r external = r fold + sheet thickness)
also you can not have the spout equal to the thickness with the walls
perpendicular (fold radius = zero)... in short look at the file.
Don't scare yourself, if you draw it again, avoid the steps that I did, I fixed it to good and better.

 

[xxfast]

unproportioned bent rays. (r external = r fold + sheet thickness)
also you can not have the spout equal to the thickness with the walls
perpendicular (fold radius = zero)... in short look at the file.
Don't scare yourself, if you draw it again, avoid the steps that I did, I fixed it to good and better.

Thank you, mike.
but did you put it back in the head?
Anyway, as I imagined. ..tocca remake it as head.
I want to emphasize that I didn't.:smile:

 

[Mike1967]

Thank you, mike.
but did you put it back in the head?
Anyway, as I imagined. ..tocca remake it as head.
I want to emphasize that I didn't.:smile:

no, I made him recognize the functions and I modified those
"anomal" to make it in sheet metal.
http://help.solidworks.com/2011/ita...help/featureworks/fworks/idh_fw_recognize.htm

 

[xxfast]

Mike, I've done it again by changing the bending rays.
so it is more feasible in the workshop.
What do you say?

 

[xxfast]

and so also from 2mm.

 

[SolidUser]

I'll work my way.

 

[Mike1967]

I'll work my way.

but you altered geometry by moving your face.
Your piece is no longer "drawing".


Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

and so also from 2mm.

Why didn't you use the "unisci" option in the extrusions?? ?
you would have avoided the "behave" function that is a waste.

If you give me time I put an example of how you should draw
correctly an object like that.

:smile:

 

[xxfast]

Why didn't you use the "unisci" option in the extrusions?? ?
you would have avoided the "behave" function that is a waste.

If you give me time I put an example of how you should draw
correctly an object like that.

:smile:

because unfortunately I come from autocad and still know all the commands of solidworks.
in fact in the 2 mm sheet there is also a connection and I have to see again to fix it.
However if you place your example, I will be happy to look at it to better understand how solidworks works.

 

[SolidUser]

but you altered geometry by moving your face.
Your piece is no longer "drawing".


Hi.

Sorry, you were the first to alter the object.
Try inserting the original one on yours and then tell me if you didn't alter it.
Do you judge by the rate of alteration?
Finally, he himself proposed two solutions with the lower face.
However that object can not be produced with die-folding techniques, so if its real need is to find development, I can give you the solution without any alteration.

 

[xxfast]

I'll work my way.

great, much easier than my solution.

 

[Mike1967]

because unfortunately I come from autocad and still know all the commands of solidworks.
in fact in the 2 mm sheet there is also a connection and I have to see again to fix it.
However if you place your example, I will be happy to look at it to better understand how solidworks works.

Bye.
look at the file that I attach to you, I did it from scratch, it calculates that there are also other ways to create that piece, in fact with solidworks there is no fixed modus operandi, arrivals to the result in different ways, depends a lot on how you are planning.
Don't mind the k factors used by me, I haven't treated them so much.

Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

Sorry, you were the first to alter the object.
Try inserting the original one on yours and then tell me if you didn't alter it.
Do you judge by the rate of alteration?
Finally, he himself proposed two solutions with the lower face.
However that object can not be produced with die-folding techniques, so if its real need is to find development, I can give you the solution without any alteration.

My was altered for obvious reasons, it is impossible to make a z if you do not give me space
for the bent rays... Or not?
on the second part of your message... are in line with you, you can do it but you have to sample the development with a piece made with the real mold with which the pz will be manufactured.

 

[SolidUser]

My was altered for obvious reasons, it is impossible to make a z if you do not give me space
for the bent rays... Or not?
on the second part of your message... are in line with you, you can do it but you have to sample the development with a piece made with the real mold with which the pz will be manufactured.

you shaped such a geometry that your diagonal is my height.
I think that to stay with the initial geometry, you have produced a sheet that is difficult to produce.
What are you gonna use?
Is your piece repeatable in time?
0.2 fold radius with die-folding ?

I refer my idea, that piece is printed and if it serves development, the solution could be direct and without any modification to the initial model.

Moreover, if it is steel, that height of 1.5 mm is little.

My change is just a millimeter.

 

[xxfast]

Okay, guys, thank you all for the help, especially because I've served to better understand the program.
As you know, the piece in question, I didn't design it, but it's the fruit of an imported file.
I will do the piece, varying the height of the omega at least 3mm. so that it will be possible to realize it in officino.