cat v5 some questions

[RS4]

the original file comes from catia v4

That's why the file was so ruined... because it pulverizes the maximum closing tolerance of surfaces with v4 and 0.01mm aime:biggrin:

 

[flaviobrio88]

That's why the file was so ruined... because it pulverizes the maximum closing tolerance of surfaces with v4 and 0.01mm aime:biggrin:

I set the toll to 0.01 (like the original)

test now I have remade the file to 640 x do not remember

 

[flaviobrio88]

Sorry I removed the video because it didn't seem right to put it here

 

[stef_design]

compliments for rs4 work. :finger:
when do you organize videotutorials for cad3d cat forum visitors? :biggrin:
I'll be the first.
Thank you very much

 

[ferrezio]

I wanted to answer you on this point, I made the example of creating the circle out of the origins (what you call a two-dimensional system in the center of the sketch) on purpose, I know that you can create the circle directly starting from the zero of the sketch axis and that there are so many predetermined forms, I just wanted to say that in many cases you will have to center the hole on the basis perhaps to other objects and become them can macchinoso with the tools v5. But instead what is wrong is me because every program has a way of working and in fact I wanted to understand that of catia and with your explanation I begin to understand it. that of the double click on the button command I did not know in fact it became frustrating every time having to select quota for each line that I had to quote haha! instead on the explanation of the profile command I already knew thanks to a tutorial of youtube. Greetings

I'm sorry if I only answer now, but I couldn't.
I understand your perplexity for an initial difficulty in the use of the catia, but the examples you brought were not very explanatory of problems, for the realization of the sketches.

I was referring to what you see in the image, in solidworks the view of the development of the piece has two lines and each a note with the characteristics instead on catia v5 does not show the central lines of the folds and not even a note of its features more does not make sense to quote those lines because it does not serve for live realization! how can I do in cay??? the only thing that comes to mind and that I have seen on a tutorial is to create halfway lines between the fold lines and then to quote them but it seems a little absurd and forced to do this!

to view the line of do txdx center on the dotted frame, then select properties\viste and check lines of center and axes. if you do it in tools\options for defolul your views will always be created in the same way.
if you have a help in line of cayenne you can also avail of the standard for creating quotation with annotation for the bend direction.

catià v5 has the ugliest interface between all cad.
I only attach an image.

who did it is a great!!!:biggrin: at least you do four laughs when you start catia, however you know that you have commands you can associate external icons?

apart from that I approve of the choice of some cads to look like office that I find optimized for common use commands.
That said, do you talk that you still have the menus in the working area that many times you have to move because they hinder the selection of objects?
The menus in the working area were born in 1995...make sure how long you are still.

really v4 had them even from before if I don't remember badly, but I can go wrong, then for the example you bring... well I can tell you... mah? I'm just a profiter, not the producer.

I don't use pdm.

I knew the sequence of questions, but I started the sentence wrong because I replaced the answer of stef.

not all do the same things or better only some manage to do everything (nx, catia,pro\e) while others are less 'powerful'.

On the least powerful I would not be so convinced, but that maybe they are less flexible maybe it is more accurate.
what I want to say is that the three mentioned are structured to be customized to the needs of a company and need people who develop and customize the various parts, while others are well formatted packages at an accessible cost to allow a company to produce.

Hello everyone

 

[alpole]

Sorry I removed the video because it didn't seem right to put it here...... what does flavio mean, I'm struggling to understand?
to the

 

[RS4]

compliments for rs4 work. :finger:
when do you organize videotutorials for cad3d cat forum visitors? :biggrin:
I'll be the first.
Thank you very much

thanks for the compliments but you don't need just put your head on it or better

I know the saying finds a way.

for video tutorials I would like but should find time

I set the toll to 0.01 (like the original)

test now I have remade the file to 640 x do not remember

you see beautiful software

but I wanted to understand the surface quality and the tangences and good I just need you to close and then feed it to other parametric cads

that closing tolerances can you have g3 tangency with curvature you get? ? ?

really v4 had them even from before if I don't remember badly, but I can go wrong, then for the example you bring... well I can tell you... mah? I'm just a profiter, not the producer.

Hello everyone

catia 4 also has toolsboxes in the working areas and I have always found myself well

I bow and you should do so in front of this software, wanting to remind you that all aircraft is military and civil in circulation in the last 25 years have been designed both used as cad and cam ncmill with v4:finger: a software bomb very stable

greetings

 

[flaviobrio88]

you see beautiful software

but I wanted to understand the surface quality and the tangences and good I just need you to close and then feed it to other parametric cads

that closing tolerances can you have g3 tangency with curvature you get? ? ?

as surfaces we reach the g4 and we do not need to pass them to another parametric cad since we are already but we need to pass them to the cam

 

[RS4]

as surfaces we reach the g4 and we do not need to pass them to another parametric cad since we are already but we need to pass them to the cam

Bye-bye

but the first extension operation you did it in tangency or only in closing point 0.01, because it is not possible that iges directly you can extract without giving you connections errors, the mathematics was too ruined you understand caia gave me closing errors beyond continuity

second phase closing hole in one shot without backs ensure that quality of surface homogeneous flexos? ?

I used the base tar surfaces

 

[flaviobrio88]

Bye-bye

but the first extension operation you did it in tangency or only in closing point 0.01, because it is not possible that iges directly you can extract without giving you connections errors, the mathematics was too ruined you understand caia gave me closing errors beyond continuity

second phase closing hole in one shot without backs ensure that quality of surface homogeneous flexos? ?

I used the base tar surfaces

Hi.
I'm not used to magic first.
the video speaks very clear direct import directly from the rar file directly from forums, I just set the toll. first at 0.01, I launched the topology that controls me discontinuity or open zones and I closed with the same tolerance
If you don't believe I don't dare tell you
Hi.

 

[RS4]

Hi.
I'm not used to magic first.
the video speaks very clear direct import directly from the rar file directly from forums, I just set the toll. first at 0.01, I launched the topology that controls me discontinuity or open zones and I closed with the same tolerance
If you don't believe I don't dare tell you
Hi.

You can't push yourself any further, otherwise you should replenish your patch if you set up 0.001mm to give you a right error? ?

 

[flaviobrio88]

You can't push yourself any further, otherwise you should replenish your patch if you set up 0.001mm to give you a right error? ?

If I use that tolerance, I would have all the red (open) and blue (detachments) edges in that case if I had to use that tolerance, I would prefer to remake everything, like in any other cad.

 

[SolidUser]

there are many reasons why nx and catia cost more than other products.
one on all is the cost of r&d. (even those you mention are true, however).
think first of all that catia and nx have a core modeling proper that should be developed/maintained.

being then used in designing sophisticated things must cover the whole process, sometimes on aspects that affect very few other companies (electrical/electronic design, sophisticated composites, sophisticated caes, specialized package for automotive/aerospace) and also the "standard" part of the product has more advanced features than the mid-range (thinking surfaces... to certain aspects of top/down design... )
That doesn't mean a high is more powerful than a mid, indeed... on certain aspects of the product a mid is more productive.

What more the mids have than the highs are bullshit. Cosmetics... (for charity, important...). the beginning is:
- a high to close gaps with a mid puts us little (see nx8)
- a mid to close the gaps with a high simply can't... it doesn't have technology... He doesn't have the r&d. He doesn't have the money.

costs are definitely due to the fact that all packages are to be developed and maintained.
I wanted to emphasize that a large company has hidden costs that involve a considerable addition to the finished product.
in a company of 500 employees, there are minimum 150 indirect.
these 150 salaries that are not directly linked to the production of the artifact, cost a surplus not indifferent.
a company where there are 25 workers and 6 employees, will have lower costs.
not to mention that in large companies, there are paintings, directors, deputy directors, etc... that have remarkable salaries.
and the marketing area?

said this, a high-end cad, with a basic license that has the same features of a mid, will cost thousands of extra euros, without having anything more.
This was my speech.

 

[SolidUser]

I tell you for so many things, but not for what I have highlighted.
therefore, according to your reasoning:
- Should a ford cost more than one audi?
- Does a fiat cost more than a ferrari?
- a samsung tv has to cost more than a bang & oloufsen?
- a kg of barilla paste must cost more than one kg of a gragnano manufacturer?
mmhh... no fear

If ford had the sales volumes of auditions, then yes.
if fiat had the sales volumes of ferrari, then yes.
If a tv samsung had the sales volumes of a bang & oloufsen, then yes.
if barilla had the sales volumes of gragnano, then yes.

you can't make examples about the types of product that have different sales volumes from those of the cad.
in the examples that mentions, there are tir that leave every day.
If catià or nx were sold as barilla products, I'm sure they would sell them at very low prices.

 

[SolidUser]

Who did I tell you that it is less intuitive than everyone on what basis? ? ?

advanced features you noticed:biggrin: we talk about 30 years of automotive aerospace development costum with titanium aluminum materials and composite of the whole product life cycle.. more than 140 dassault modules and many other external ones from official partners .... specialized for aviation composite both as cad solutions that cam everything in a single solution i.e. catia v5 I want to remind you developed first by boeing in collaboration with dassault




has an excellent all-screen interface!!! you have the opportunity to move the icons where you want and create new ones!!!! without ever having visual problems in the working air, macros in will costumed for every need with the possibility to create also the icon with the mokamucca:finger:, steps from one module to another in an immediate way you can work hybrid and not, class surfaces with excellent fast computing capabilities even more complex

continues to make cubes in the sketch quickly with solid works, than to the rest of the automotive aerospace ..... specialist thinks catia pro/e and nx


I attach my icons see if you like most custom

greetings

I've been working with the cad for a lifetime.
I come from euclid of the matra dating which was then bought by dassault to bring birth catià.
I have worked with all the cads and I guarantee that catià is the least intuitive.
Maybe you don't have my own cad experience.
If for you the image you posted represents your 'all-screen', then we are not.
catià is back years with the interface.
I wanted to remind you, maybe you missed it, that behind the new live building interfaces, draftsight, etc. there are solidworks corp operators.
this to tell you how much French programmers are evolved with interfaces.
if then solidworks stays back and cannot implement some features, it is not to blur catià.
impactxoft (module of mold) was implemented by solidworks programmers, but then aborted for obvious reasons.
you have compartment icem for your class surfaces a.
smartteam is a plm that does cag....in fact if seen what end he did.
the idea of the cloud and other you are implementing is an idea of solidworks executives.
There are so many things that you miss on your product.

 

[RS4]

I've been working with the cad for a lifetime.
I come from euclid of the matra dating which was then bought by dassault to bring birth catià.
I have worked with all the cads and I guarantee that catià is the least intuitive.
Maybe you don't have my own cad experience.
If for you the image you posted represents your 'all-screen', then we are not.
catià is back years with the interface.
I wanted to remind you, maybe you missed it, that behind the new live building interfaces, draftsight, etc. there are solidworks corp operators.
this to tell you how much French programmers are evolved with interfaces.
if then solidworks stays back and cannot implement some features, it is not to blur catià.
impactxoft (module of mold) was implemented by solidworks programmers, but then aborted for obvious reasons.
you have compartment icem for your class surfaces a.
smartteam is a plm that does cag....in fact if seen what end he did.
the idea of the cloud and other you are implementing is an idea of solidworks executives.
There are so many things that you miss on your product.

I don't really agree what you say until now I'm just chatting, you know about the executives and many more chatting to hear.

the colud means cloud of points exists from the first versions mah booo and who understands you

I canosco pro/e catia v4 and catia v5 for almost 10 years now and I can assure you that the latter and truly the absolute top complete 360° repeating yourself from design to engineerin to manufacturing any it is even if I know more the composite

Hi.

♪

 

[RS4]

If I use that tolerance, I would have all the red (open) and blue (detachments) edges in that case if I had to use that tolerance, I would prefer to remake everything, like in any other cad.

ok it was normal that I answer so you can't make magic. :smile:


cmq compliments for software is amazing awesome :biggrin:

but do you usually rebuild everything if not the quality and poorly 0.01mm with the classic patchwork? ?



and a software that works only with surfaces I have acnche solid modeling axiemi etc..


Hi.

♪

 

[flaviobrio88]

impact xoft (modulo di mold) was implemented by solidworks programmers.

a small correction :
impactxosft was developed by an Italian and then sold to catia.

 

[flaviobrio88]

but do you usually rebuild everything if not the quality and poorly 0.01mm with the classic patchwork? ?

♪

I personally do, I do so, it bothers me too much to put in place the detachments created by others

 

[stef_design]

catià is back years with the interface.
I wanted to remind you, maybe you missed it, that behind the new live building interfaces, draftsight, etc. there are solidworks corp operators.
this to tell you how much French programmers are evolved with interfaces.

1 thing - since you know all cad. catia is without accent (no catià).
2 What - why do you think there is catia?
3 thing - why do all major automotive and aerospace companies use catia?

I used sw until 2006. implementation use catia and proe...trusted as intuition and usability catia does not beat it.
I agree with you that sw is very intuitive and well done... I make two considerations.
Have you ever seen catia multibody modeling? (do not pull out the story that sw also has the multibody because it matches and merges are two c...te in comparison with the catia commands).
Have you ever seen the management of the large assembly of caia?

supportive difference between a mid-range and a high is project life management.
with cv5 you can cover the entire design (cad, cae>abaqus, cam, plm) with sw ti stop and you have to rely on third-party products.
bye:smile: