cat v5 some questions

[flaviobrio88]

I threw the sponge because the test was se nx could do with only two commands what makes omnicad.

for the truth the example I have shown is not part of the basic package of omnicad, hangs, we can say that it is almost n cad aside is a dedicated module only for those who make molds sheet automotive sector, the closing speech is only a drop of the module and it has been developed in three years along with a German car company
I attach an image
in the image the celestial surfaces (all) are obtained in less than a minute those same surfaces with any other cad you could get in 8/9 hours and make them parametric would be very difficult, while with this module and using only two commands the parameters remain editable and easily manageable.

 

[Utente NX]

I investigated the size of the patch and igs generated and the problem was importing without the due options.
I imported with simplification parameters (example of planary b-surfaces become flat analytical, small edges become tangents, cylindrical b-surfaces become faces of revolution, etc.).
now the nx file and some mega, as well as the igs.
I ask to verify the object obtained at flavio and rs4 if it is correct as from test.
for the extension I tell you that there is a point that doesn't fit me and I should omit it to generate it by next step and that would make me out of the competition.

 

[flaviobrio88]

I investigated the size of the patch and igs generated and the problem was importing without the due options.
I imported with simplification parameters (example of planary b-surfaces become flat analytical, small edges become tangents, cylindrical b-surfaces become faces of revolution, etc.).
now the nx file and some mega, as well as the igs.
I ask to verify the object obtained at flavio and rs4 if it is correct as from test.
for the extension I tell you that there is a point that doesn't fit me and I should omit it to generate it by next step and that would make me out of the competition.

Good job!!!

 

[Utente NX]

Good job!!!

Are they in tolerance and tangency?
because I did the same operations as when you showed me everything, only that importing the igs I activated optimization operations and 'heal geometry'.
I noticed that even omnicad does something about it.
the surfaces imported from the first igs file are less beautiful than the imported igs with your extend and close.

 

[Utente NX]

I wanted to show the problem and therefore the abandonment.
in that area the result is not accepted, therefore having to operate locally.
operate locally would make me come out of the competition of only 2 commands.
I'd be curious to know how catia acts with the operation you extend.

 

[RS4]

I investigated the size of the patch and igs generated and the problem was importing without the due options.
I imported with simplification parameters (example of planary b-surfaces become flat analytical, small edges become tangents, cylindrical b-surfaces become faces of revolution, etc.).
now the nx file and some mega, as well as the igs.
I ask to verify the object obtained at flavio and rs4 if it is correct as from test.
for the extension I tell you that there is a point that doesn't fit me and I should omit it to generate it by next step and that would make me out of the competition.

from the analysis carried out on your file is good:smile:

I found some opening...

I attach image where you can see that turquoise color is closed in tangence and where there is no color exceeds the required tangence so there is an aperture greater than 0.01mmm

Hi.

♪

 

[RS4]

I wanted to show the problem and therefore the abandonment.
in that area the result is not accepted, therefore having to operate locally.
operate locally would make me come out of the competition of only 2 commands.
I'd be curious to know how catia acts with the operation you extend.

then nx I tried directly from the file of flavio

I can extend in one command... I press that I don't know but it's the first time I use... ,
It happens to me your same thing if I exceed 2.7-2.8mm of extension...which is accavala or in the trays creates radial vents flanked... .

I have extended with 2.5mm no problem try to make these tests too. .


allego file.. iges and img

Hi.

♪

 

[Utente NX]

from the analysis carried out on your file is good:smile:

I found some opening...

I attach image where you can see that turquoise color is closed in tangence and where there is no color exceeds the required tangence so there is an aperture greater than 0.01mmm

Hi.

♪

I put tolerance g1 to 0.01 and left g0 to 0.0254.
Maybe it's that or maybe it's the igs.
I investigate further and then write.

 

[Utente NX]

then nx I tried directly from the file of flavio

I can extend in one command... I press that I don't know but it's the first time I use... ,
It happens to me your same thing if I exceed 2.7-2.8mm of extension...which is accavala or in the trays creates radial vents flanked... .

I have extended with 2.5mm no problem try to make these tests too. .


allego file.. iges and img

Hi.

♪

for that I did not continue, flavio asked 5 mm.
at that distance I have no problem, but 5 mm are required.
I should do everything to 5 mm and exclude a board from the command, but they are out of the 2 total commands.

 

[flaviobrio88]

madooo! I don't believe it yet!

compliments to all 2 for tenacity !!! :finger:

san ginna no te crucià but na surface is omnicad dissolves ' or sanghe dint' and veins:biggrin:

 

[solokite]

impactxosft was closing and those of solidworks took the form to implement it in sw, of which I tried.
after the test period, I asked if it was integrated in sw.
No answer.
after learned from an article that catia had inserted this form.
sw clearly was already a dassault product.

:frown::frown::frown:

 

[solokite]

Can this .igs be okay?
clearly with the surface functions already present from the basic version of solidworks.
not in a single function, but halfway between five and 10 functions.

Can you post the part or it's too heavy?

 

[cassanelli]

by now lives of income has commands that happen between them. and do not serve. and not intuitive. and is losing much step with the times.in ferrari and only convenient for the surfaces.

 

[michediga]

Hi, I hook up to the discussion taking advantage to ask where I can find tables to do exercise in the development of surfaces obviously cyclo v5. Thank you.

 

[gianni55]

What exactly do you mean by surface development?

Hi.