cat v5 some questions

[SolidUser]

a small correction :
impactxosft was developed by an Italian and then sold to catia.

impactxosft was closing and those of solidworks took the form to implement it in sw, of which I tried.
after the test period, I asked if it was integrated in sw.
No answer.
after learned from an article that catia had inserted this form.
sw clearly was already a dassault product.

 

[flaviobrio88]

3 thing - why do all major automotive and aerospace companies use catia?

for tranquility of large companies

If you were a mega director of a big multinational you would take responsibility to entrust all your technical department to a small or medium company that while doing a great software remains small?

 

[www.cad-3d.net]

Well, this topic that states that small companies are not able to provide reliable products to large companies I don't think it is completely true. I point out that the small arm (the microprocessors of tablets and smartphones) is making giant shoes such as intel, amd, nvidia and others (rim and Qualcomm not yet but...) in the field of new devices.

what stef_design says I think is objectively true but I can also understand those who have learned to appreciate other software and who have found them more suitable for their way of reasoning and therefore, for them, more "intuitive".

As far as I'm concerned with catia, I've never had any difficulties while with pro/e I've had my "scratch" and so far, despite the writing of the manual, something I still have to learn.

Greetings to everyone!

of the noble

 

[flaviobrio88]

Well, this topic that states that small companies are not able to provide reliable products to large companies I don't think it is completely true. I point out that the small arm (the microprocessors of tablets and smartphones) is making giant shoes such as intel, amd, nvidia and others (rim and Qualcomm not yet but...) in the field of new devices.

I'm not saying this, I'm just saying that big companies don't trust small ones, and I agree with you that small spheres often break the c** or the big ones

 

[mcbramby]

I'm not saying this, I'm just saying that big companies don't trust small ones, and I agree with you that small spheres often break the c** or the big ones

then disappear and be......... absorbed:biggrin:

 

[mcbramby]

+ that in their way of reasoning ......... They adapted to the 3d they are using, and then they see one that doesn't think like "their" then it's worth nothing.
I am always of the opinion that you must adapt to the program you use and it is difficult to find a program that reasons according to your desires......... :smile:

 

[SolidUser]

Well, this topic that states that small companies are not able to provide reliable products to large companies I don't think it is completely true. I point out that the small arm (the microprocessors of tablets and smartphones) is making giant shoes such as intel, amd, nvidia and others (rim and Qualcomm not yet but...) in the field of new devices.

arm is an architecture in which many, including intel, forage with money, investments for its development.
therefore behind all this there is the value of the intellect of many companies.
production then took place in the classic Eastern countries.
so do not consider arm as a small company.
arm is a coperative of hw producers who adhere and help develop this architecture.

 

[flaviobrio88]

then disappear and be......... absorbed:biggrin:

or magnify and bother the big

 

[cacciatorino]

for tranquility of large companies

"no one ever got fired for buying ibm"

 

[barlafus]

That's the opposite.
between all cad, catià is the least easy and intuitive.
the high cost is not an index of what you mentioned.
the high cost is due to 3 factors.
1) advanced features
2) corporate structure (how do you pay thousands of employees) if you do not sell it as uranium
3) Name

for me here you ran off the clutch

catià v5 has the ugliest interface between all cad.
I only attach an image.
How much does the basic licence cost?
with all that costs, more professional icons?
They're not stupid.
think if in your home you would propose such an icon for an interface of your product, what your dt or colleagues might think.
and should I pay you 1500 euros a month?

the curve of draining of catiah is the lowest in absolute.

what makes faith are the statistics on this forum.
There are hundreds and hundreds of neophytes or students who start using sw without courses and cubes and asses manage to do them.

ask to make cubes and assemble from scratch with catiah v5 and see if they succeed.

I don't speak for party taken, but the truth is right here, on the forum.

and again

Does it cost you more than a washing machine made by a company with 100 employees or 1000?
the cost of a cad is also linked to the company structure, as happens in the industrial metalmechanical one.

This reasoning does not bend: therefore the cheapest washing machine makes it a company with only 1 employee

I come from euclid of the matra dating which was then bought by dassault to bring birth catià.

Maybe you don't have my own cad experience.

this to tell you how much French programmers are evolved with interfaces.
if then solidworks stays back and cannot implement some features, it is not to blur catià.

you have compartment icem for your class surfaces a.

smartteam is a plm that does cag....in fact if seen what end he did.

the idea of the cloud and other you are implementing is an idea of solidworks executives.
There are so many things that you miss on your product.

the matra was not purchased to "be a cat". work with cad from a lifetime but you miss that catia existed from before v5, i.e. v4, v3 and, only for a few pioneers, v2 (rs4 paid you a tribute to v4). Maybe you miss other things...
Maybe he doesn't have your own experience with the cad, or maybe you don't have his. Mah.

You bought icem... rs4, do you work at dassault? I would have something to ask you about the v6 maybe.. .

smarteam is a plm that makes... So, do you know all the pdms?

I'm not saying this, I'm just saying that big companies don't trust small ones, and I agree with you that small spheres often break the c** or the big ones

It is not that large companies do not trust small ones. they cannot entrust a big project to a small company; need a partner of "equal level". example: if the dassault (or the siemens or the ptc) provide a plm to a large company that makes cars and the project fails, the big company knows that it can rival economically (I know, it is not easy and however there would be an endless legal war), if instead it relies on a small supplier and the project fails, even if winning all the legal races, it would not always lead home a tenth of what would lose,
or, as the matrix said, in the daimler operation they worked in many to take the customer, but then to follow it they will need many more people. if the siemens were composed of (only) 500 people would not even be able to do the basic course to the designers!
that then the small ones often break the c** or to the big ones is true, but on details or small functions (cad). always thematrix explained to us that large companies need to cover the needs of their processes and not only to satisfy fantastically few functions.

 

[flaviobrio88]

It is not that large companies do not trust small ones. they cannot entrust a big project to a small company; need a partner of "equal level". example: if the dassault (or the siemens or the ptc) provide a plm to a large company that makes cars and the project fails, the big company knows that it can rival economically (I know, it is not easy and however there would be an endless legal war), if instead it relies on a small supplier and the project fails, even if winning all the legal races, it would not always lead home a tenth of what would lose,
or, as the matrix said, in the daimler operation they worked in many to take the customer, but then to follow it they will need many more people. if the siemens were composed of (only) 500 people would not even be able to do the basic course to the designers!
that then the small ones often break the c** or to the big ones is true, but on details or small functions (cad). always thematrix explained to us that large companies need to cover the needs of their processes and not only to satisfy fantastically few functions.

for our luck is not always so,
we have as customers about 7 car manufacturers among Italians, Japanese Germans and Americans and as size are at least 300000 times bigger than us, and also true that the requirement that they ask us and that the data exchange with nx and catia is excellent and also true that many other times after a demo on pieces they obviously tell us interesting product though it is not catia we can take nothing

with regard to small functions are just those that allow us to enter these big companies and I can assure you that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they can't do .

I would like to remind you that alias, undisputed leader in the style industry was bought a few years ago.
so also the big ones collapse

 

[barlafus]

for our luck is not always so,
we have as customers about 7 car manufacturers among Italians, Japanese Germans and Americans and as size are at least 300000 times bigger than us, and also true that the requirement that they ask us and that the data exchange with nx and catia is excellent and also true that many other times after a demo on pieces they obviously tell us interesting product though it is not catia we can take nothing

'small' does not mean that it will never be a supplier of a large company; the small does not have the ability (as I mean numbers) to support a great project, but if the peculiarities of its product are useful, it certainly manages to sell also to the big (and fortunately, I add, otherwise a boredom... )

with regard to small functions are just those that allow us to enter these big companies and I can assure you that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they can't do .

'small' does not mean poor, indeed, sometimes there are admirable points of excellence. but, always referring to thematrix, the function, even fantastic unfortunately does not cover the process.
I have no idea.

I would like to remind you that alias, undisputed leader in the style industry was bought a few years ago.
so also the big ones collapse

As far as I know it, alias is one of the leaders in the industrial design sector, however, excuse me if I repeat, it covers the style very well but then it is enough. engineering, wiring, cam, equipment, welding, etc., he doesn't even know what they are (and I would say he doesn't even care. . )

You're right, 'big' doesn't mean eternal.
in the case of alias though, it was acquired by autodesk, even larger.
If we look at the bigger ones (dassault, siemens, autodesk and ptc), they do not follow the policy of inventing a new product, I imagine that for them it is much easier (economic laws) to buy it from the market and put it in their offer.
everything has price!

 

[flaviobrio88]

'small' does not mean that it will never be a supplier of a large company; the small does not have the ability (as I mean numbers) to support a great project, but if the peculiarities of its product are useful, it certainly manages to sell also to the big (and fortunately, I add, otherwise a boredom... )


'small' does not mean poor, indeed, sometimes there are admirable points of excellence. but, always referring to thematrix, the function, even fantastic unfortunately does not cover the process.
I have no idea.


As far as I know it, alias is one of the leaders in the industrial design sector, however, excuse me if I repeat, it covers the style very well but then it is enough. engineering, wiring, cam, equipment, welding, etc., he doesn't even know what they are (and I would say he doesn't even care. . )

You're right, 'big' doesn't mean eternal.
in the case of alias though, it was acquired by autodesk, even larger.
If we look at the bigger ones (dassault, siemens, autodesk and ptc), they do not follow the policy of inventing a new product, I imagine that for them it is much easier (economic laws) to buy it from the market and put it in their offer.
everything has price!

very clear and I agree in everything

 

[SolidUser]

Here's the riddle!

Can this .igs be okay?
clearly with the surface functions already present from the basic version of solidworks.
not in a single function, but halfway between five and 10 functions.

 

[alpole]

excellent solid user
Good job.
to the

 

[virginia2011]

Good morning.
a link for those who want to understand the potential of catia v5: http://www.intelliform.it/intelliform/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=244&itemid=101

 

[RS4]

for our luck is not always so,
we have as customers about 7 car manufacturers among Italians, Japanese Germans and Americans and as size are at least 300000 times bigger than us, and also true that the requirement that they ask us and that the data exchange with nx and catia is excellent and also true that many other times after a demo on pieces they obviously tell us interesting product though it is not catia we can take nothing

with regard to small functions are just those that allow us to enter these big companies and I can assure you that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they are not macros made by some kid who did not know what to do but they are functionality that customers have been asking for caia and nx for years and that they can't do .

I would like to remind you that alias, undisputed leader in the style industry was bought a few years ago.
so also the big ones collapse

Hello flavio

return because I wanted to tell you that I managed this time to close the cutout in a single fill command, advanced surfaces however of catia not base as the other time the comendo is: "creation associative filling surfaces" with a closing distance 0.002mm

I'll put your analysis, so you can take a look at him, master

If you want math tell me the place

Hi.

♪

 

[flaviobrio88]

great job!!! !

:finger:

 

[The_Matrix]

Excuse me. . .
But what's the use of a lock made like that? ? ?

I don't know. .

 

[RS4]

Excuse me. . .
But what's the use of a lock made like that? ? ?

I don't know. .

hi matrix good morning

it was only to test the potential of the cad in question. . .

flavio manages with omnicad to close that cutout with only one fill command and posted the mathematics precisely to try also in catia v5 if you could do it. .
the report and this:

with the basic module of catia, you cannot in one command and in one patch, but you have to build 2 passing curves for the center and then cotrude 4 patches.. and close

with the advanced surface module instead you can with only one command like omnicad, with the parametric associative fill command and I managed to close with tolls. 0.002 as you can see from the analysis


Hi.

♪