potential video frame

[gianlucap]

I installed a new picture nvidia board 4000, replacing it to a less performing firegl ati, but the results I see do not change.
I see that my pc continues to exploit the potential of the pc (processors and hard disk ) and not that of the video card is normal?

 

[reb_bl]

I installed a new picture nvidia board 4000, replacing it to a less performing firegl ati, but the results I see do not change.
I see that my pc continues to exploit the potential of the pc (processors and hard disk ) and not that of the video card is normal?

have you installed the recommended drivers by inventor?

 

[MarcoBi]

I installed a new picture nvidia board 4000, replacing it to a less performing firegl ati, but the results I see do not change.
I see that my pc continues to exploit the potential of the pc (processors and hard disk ) and not that of the video card is normal?

quoto.
same results with fx3800 on a z600 hp. the only advantage with very heavy files is given by the 64bit operating system that sees more rams. the card, while installing the specific drivers does not seem to contribute (even in purely graphic terms).

 

[Peppe]

quoto.
same results with fx3800 on a z600 hp. the only advantage with very heavy files is given by the 64bit operating system that sees more rams. the card, while installing the specific drivers does not seem to contribute (even in purely graphic terms).

same your pc but with fx4800, with inventor 2010 a bomb (in graphic terms) then with 2011 and equal 2012 some worsenings

 

[ipotemusa]

same your pc but with fx4800, with inventor 2010 a bomb (in graphic terms) then with 2011 and equal 2012 some worsenings

it's been for more than a year that I don't use it, but if I don't remember badly on the ws where it was installed it was selected d3d (recommended) on display options.
Thus making use of a picture is useless (which is confirmed by a retailer) and paradoxically works better with lyric cards, optimized for video games and directx.
forget me if you have info + precise.

 

[gianlucap]

I have installed all the drivers recommended by autodesk but big differences regarding the ati are not there, and I see that others are of my own opinion, so before making such a purchase valued well.
Hello everyone

 

[GiGa]

I have installed all the drivers recommended by autodesk but big differences regarding the ati are not there, and I see that others are of my own opinion, so before making such a purchase valued well.

I use a modest fx580 and every so well-known shovel of too much (especially with light settings at the highest quality)...
by curiosity, in raytracing mode, do you have any gain or the calculation goes all on cpu?

in any case, a card like yours will make you feel with the other programs of the new suites... 3ds first... always do something to you:

 

[gianlucap]

by curiosity, in raytracing mode, do you have any gain or the calculation goes all on cpu?

at the moment I only realized that the rotation of assemblies composed of more than 5000 pieces rotates them that is a fairy tale, which instead with the old ati it seemed to me to go a lot to snaps, for raytracing I do not know what it is

in any case, a card like yours will make you feel with the other programs of the new suites... 3ds first... always do something to you:

We hope that the bosses will update me to the new suites!

 

[re_solidworks]

at the moment I only realized that the rotation of assemblies composed of more than 5000 pieces rotates them that is a fairy tale, which instead with the old ati it seemed to me to go a lot to snaps, for raytracing I do not know what it is



We hope that the bosses will update me to the new suites!

But I'm sorry, then you had an advantage. What should do besides this a vga?

 

[GiGa]

at the moment I only realized that the rotation of assemblies composed of more than 5000 pieces rotates them that is a fairy tale, which instead with the old ati this seemed to me to go a lot to snaps

But I'm sorry, then you had an advantage. What should do besides this a vga?

actually

for raytracing I don't know what it is

is a real-time rendering display mode in raytracing mode, almost photorealistic... introduced with 2012.
I don't know if it was already available with 2011, I used it very little.

 

[re_solidworks]

the series with still architecture uses the cuda technology that helps the cpu in the calculation. this provided that the software is written so as to exploit such technology, at the presentation of 2012 autodesk told me that 3ds has a huge advantage and that the waiting time for the processing of a yarn depends to 90% on the vga. If, for example, long films are often made with many objects, they even contain a dual 6000 picture in sli.

 

[gianlucap]

But I'm sorry, then you had an advantage. What should do besides this a vga?

There was certainly an advantage, but if I had taken the nvidia picture 2000 I would certainly have solved my problem anyway without spending a lot of money compared to 4000.
However if now they update me to the new release with 3ds there is to have fun!

 

[GiGa]

but here we enter the personal needs... you work with 100,000 faces (spreading a random number) and 2000 maybe it is also "oversized"... who works with 2,000,000 faces maybe with the 4000 feels a little "straight" and must go on the 5000...

Moreover, at a certain complexity of the model corresponds to a maximum speed "appreciable", beyond which the possible increase does not lead to obvious advantages in terms of usability.
For example: if a model rotates in viewport to 30 rotations per second, it is useless (as well as not appreciable to the eye) that rotates to 40...

with 3ds max & co you'll have to use it. . .

 

[bebeto]

problem that exists since autodesk abandoned opengl in favor of d3d.
in practice money for a painting is not well spent or at least not fruit as they should.
I also went to boxes every once in a while, partly solved with the latest certified drivers for the 2012 version.