funz problem. belt/chain ad after shift

[reggio]

Hi, I write to ask you for help in understanding the motivations of the error that I happen to...

I have a belt wrapping on 2 reels,
the rollers are fixed to a frame that rises and lowers,
It happens to me that, if starting from the bottom, I lift the frame of a little and aggiorno, the strap follows me and does not give errors, if I rise too much I get a mistake...

I don't understand the reason for the mistake... and you?

 

[meccanicamg]

The error is due to the sweep function. I have always done the tapes as a subtle extrusion. I changed the tape, but the palette is missing, but the problem is solved. with the sweep there was the sketch of the tape width that obviously did not remain normal for some reason.

 

[SolidUser]

reggio, I used the belt function, which saves it to me as an internal component of the axieme, but then I save it as an independent and remains under the belt function.
This doesn't make me any problem with changing the piston stroke.
I think you used a different method from mine.
I'm out of a warning, but I'll see to investigate why.

I wanted to add suggestions:

Reggio 1) why did you create an exhaust and then another to bend when you could do it with a single function?

reggio 2) why did you not create a sketch of layout and extruded several times?
Why use the revolution when you could use the subtle extrusion?
save time and the piece is faster in rebuilding.

Reggio 3) why did you do a set when you could put it in the welded?

reggio 4) do not use classical modeling functions in the sheet environment, use the commands of the sheet where they are present and possible.

 

[sampom]

... dealing with the same part and remaining unchanged the distance of the rollers, I don't understand the reason for the error.... and you?

the error is due to the swee...

It also works with the sweep. only that the tape profile sketch you have to do it on a "dedicated" plane and not on the right system. the plan must pass through a point of the path and be normal to it, so that it is always "legated" and that it always follows.
Also the skewer sketch you have to do it with a little "cognition", that is bound to the surface of the carpet.
check out the little changes I made.

greetings
MarView attachment Assieme smpm.rar

 

[reggio]

The error is due to the sweep function. I have always done the tapes as a subtle extrusion. . .

I saw, I preferred belt/chain because it gives me control over development. . .

I wanted to add suggestions:
1) because you created an exhaust and then another...
Reggio 2a) because in the drum you do not have a sketch of layout.. .
2b) why the revolution when you could use the subtle extrusion?
Reggio 3) because you made a set... ?
4) do not use classical modeling functions in the sheet environment. . .

1)It is true, in another post we had seen it, in this case I had already "resolved" so and I did not put + my hands...
2a)I don't understand what you meant to ask me? ?
2b)I made it easier for you, in reality it is not cylindrical. . .
3) also this question I do not understand (consider cmq that all the aid was simplified before posting it)
4) I was trying to do as you suggest but without "exasperation", if it gives advantages now I will try to follow the straight, thank you ;p

It also works with the sweep. only that the tape profile sketch you have to do it on a "dedicated" plane and not on the right system.

I have seen, thank you, I will continue cmq with belt/chain only to have more easily the measurement of development.

thanks to all:d

 

[meccanicamg]

I don't understand one thing, I try to explain myself and tell me if I'm saying the same thing:

- in atoms with belt/chain command creates the belt sketch
- always with chain strap joins part 3d

but look that part 3d you can do it with sweep rather than thin extrusion or whatever you want, so much the value of development always indicates it in mm at the head of the function sludge/chain.

What do you mean "with belt/chain only to have more easily the measure of development"? ? ?

 

[reggio]

I don't understand something.

:redface: ehmmm no, yes, that is:redface:
I thought you advised me to do a sketch of the path without using chain strap, then do the section and then use the sweep...
I didn't understand. . .

thanks and soon

 

[sampom]

...I thought you advised me to do a sketch of the path without using chain strap.. .

How? I put the correct file back from me and the strap/chain is there, with the method to make the right sketch on the right plane. You didn't see him?