inventor vs solidworks ( ancora !!! )

[cassero88]

hi to all in university continues to circulate the 'voice' that in companies it is used solid works and that it is much better than inventor.in the course of mechanical engineering in pavia they taught us inventor boasting it as the best and most used.
What do you think? ?

 

[Enzolog]

If you do a search, you will already find such a discussion.

 

[re_solidworks]

hi to all in university continues to circulate the 'voice' that in companies it is used solid works and that it is much better than inventor.in the course of mechanical engineering in pavia they taught us inventor boasting it as the best and most used.
What do you think? ?

from what I have seen as a solidworks modeler is clearly superior, both for the greater wealth of functions, and for the best management of hardware resources.
As for the table many users say that the inventor is better, I do not have enough manual skills on inventor to confirm this voice.

autodesk satisfies this discrepancy by adding other software with autocad mechanicla, 3dsmax, etc... in premium pds.

 

[pompeo79]

http://www.cad-portal.com/articles/article_images/106/fa whitepaper10b.pdf

 

[xxfast]

I love a lot of slidworks, but in my area I always need solidedege.
So now, even if a bit of a pain, I'm starting to see it.
I think it sometimes depends on where you work.

 

[Ivan1990]

2 years of inventor at school + additional courses, now I work with solidworks from 1 year and a few months, learn with inventor and if you ever have to learn solidworks you will already have the basics of a parametric program, and the passage from one to another is not very complicated, learn to reason to make a tree of logical functions and with ease of modification, to reason on how to get something and the various solutions to reach the end and what they do the best, the certain do not make the difference.

 

[re_solidworks]

I love a lot of slidworks, but in my area I always need solidedege.
So now, even if a bit of a pain, I'm starting to see it.
I think it sometimes depends on where you work.

in my solidedge area practically does not exist. the only company that used it has failed and therefore has disappeared. from my parts the most rooted is solidworks, in second line inventor and in third proe and not by chance are the 3 I bought:biggrin:

 

[gadec]

at the university that I am attending we used only solidworks student edition. regarding the diffusion where I am going for the major autocad 3d, proe,solidedge,catia unfortunately sw is practically unknown..:-(This at least what I am told to me guys already graduates who make designers/machining mechanical.

 

[Tequila]

in my solidedge area practically does not exist. the only company that used it has failed and therefore has disappeared. from my parts the most rooted is solidworks, in second line inventor and in third proe and not by chance are the 3 I bought:biggrin:

by curiosity, in which area of the Veneto live or better work. I in the padovano use solid edge and know several companies around it.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

hi to all in university continues to circulate the 'voice' that in companies it is used solid works and that it is much better than inventor.in the course of mechanical engineering in pavia they taught us inventor boasting it as the best and most used.
What do you think? ?

I think they're the usual metropolitan legends and you don't have to listen to them!
the most used? Where? in a municipality, a province, a region, a nation?
Let them bring statistics to those gentlemen who say so.
for the best definitely is better swx without shadow of doubt.

greetings

 

[The_Matrix]

hi to all in university continues to circulate the 'voice' that in companies it is used solid works and that it is much better than inventor.in the course of mechanical engineering in pavia they taught us inventor boasting it as the best and most used.
What do you think? ?

I'm telling you very much. .
that balls with the same threads.
but there will be 3 more with the same title only on the first page of the forum "Mevvanic cad". . .
essignur.

 

[re_solidworks]

http://www.cad-portal.com/articles/article_images/106/fa whitepaper10b.pdf

I haven't read the survey thoroughly, but it's just ridiculous. There are colossal bales, I refused to read the detail descriptions, but simply reading the charts.... there is enough to run in the yard and roll on the ground!

 

[Tequila]

I haven't read the survey thoroughly, but it's just ridiculous. There are colossal bales, I refused to read the detail descriptions, but simply reading the charts.... there is enough to run in the yard and roll on the ground!

are the usual polls that put in the brochures to show that they have it bigger than the competition... then you are facing the rock and fall stage!!! !

 

[pompeo79]

http://www.deskeng.com/virtual_desktop/?p=2281

 

[re_solidworks]

I read the articles and do not discuss that on the points of the inventor questions may have been better, let's say that the questions were definitely carefully selected to bring out this result.
how can inventor be better than swx in the design of plastics when it does not even have worthy surfaces of this name? letting it be that this is a field where the big cads do it as masters... Don't say that inv is better, it's a great ball!
and what about the performance of the assemblies? the first thing I've noticed in inventor is the difficulty in managing the assemblies, compared to swx.
and what about reliability in topdown modeling?
the fact that the survey was funded by autodesk says long, indeed it says all!

Moreover you should look beyond the release of the cad. what is on the market for the cads in question to satisfy the needs of a company? at the pdm level there is everything and star them to plant the nail on the data management is time lost (in my opinion). with a dedicated pdm you do first and better.
regarding the structures... with swx I made of bigettes and the structures were subsequently analyzed with solidworks simulation premium (not covered in the quoted package). There is no import as the cad model is used by the fem and all elements are automatically reconused (beam-shell-solid).
in the test they talk about autodesk innovations... but if when I was at the demo I have seen only functions already present in swx for several years, this seems to me a chase more than an innovation.
Well, that's enough. . .

 

[Tequila]

I repeat again:
They want to show that they have it bigger than the competition... then you are facing the rock and fall stage!!! !

It happens with anything else... the first demonstrations of this kind for example were comparative advertising of detergents and here we are no less.

 

[The_Matrix]

I read the questions and answers and evaluations. . .
:biggrin:

if they managed to convince us that the spread was torpedo and that the arrival of one of those that caused the crisis will solve it. . .
then we can also believe that inv is better than swx in modeling