develop a rectangle cone to round

[19marco77]

Morning. . .
I take advantage of the discussion.
I believe (in fact, it's safe) that something is wrong with the sketches.
when selecting the bending with loft asks me to select the thickness and number of bending lines, when selecting the sketches disappears from the selection the choice of the number of bending lines. Can anyone help me? Thank you.
Marco.

 

[Mike1967]

Morning. . .
I take advantage of the discussion.
I believe (in fact, it's safe) that something is wrong with the sketches.
when selecting the bending with loft asks me to select the thickness and number of bending lines, when selecting the sketches disappears from the selection the choice of the number of bending lines. Can anyone help me? Thank you.
Marco.

sketches must stand on parallel planes. sketches must be open and each profile must be a sketch itself.
the circle (arch) cannot be whole but interrupted at the sides of the other sketch (the guide is clear on the subject).
If you soddifi the requirements you can set the n° of folds.
your file has a loft, so sketches closed, besides the 2 sketches that form the loft are not on parallel planes.

 

[Mike1967]

Morning. . .
I take advantage of the discussion.
I believe (in fact, it's safe) that something is wrong with the sketches.
when selecting the bending with loft asks me to select the thickness and number of bending lines, when selecting the sketches disappears from the selection the choice of the number of bending lines. Can anyone help me? Thank you.
Marco.

I found this model in my archive, you can change it to your need.
if I don't make it up with the 2010 version.

 

[19marco77]

sketches must stand on parallel planes. sketches must be open and each profile must be a sketch itself.
the circle (arch) cannot be whole but interrupted at the sides of the other sketch (the guide is clear on the subject).
If you soddifi the requirements you can set the n° of folds.
your file has a loft, so sketches closed, besides the 2 sketches that form the loft are not on parallel planes.

you know that this was in "normal" loft but it was to have as soon as possible a similar part to apply. I'll try to divide the arch as you suggested. I had lost that passage

Thank you.

 

[Mike1967]

you know that this was in "normal" loft but it was to have as soon as possible a similar part to apply. I'll try to divide the arch as you suggested. I had lost that passage

Thank you.

I suppose... :smile:
Good job.

 

[19marco77]

I suppose... :smile:
Good job.

place the result. Thank you, mike.
I changed yours. I tried to do as you had recommended but still did not let me select the profile "tondo" boh!!! I'll take it when I have a moment. Thanks again
Marco.

 

[Mike1967]

place the result. Thank you, mike.
I changed yours. I tried to do as you had recommended but still did not let me select the profile "tondo" boh!!! I'll take it when I have a moment. Thanks again
Marco.

If you want a dispassionate advice, avoid creating those profiles with 3d sketch.
in some cases maintaining complacency is not so obvious and the results are those where you are encapsulated.

 

[19marco77]

If you want a dispassionate advice, avoid creating those profiles with 3d sketch.
in some cases maintaining complacency is not so obvious and the results are those where you are encapsulated.

Good morning mike,

Take patience if I break again. I followed your advice and tried to remake the profiles in a sketch not 3d.
The same result doesn't develop my loft when you have time and want to take a look at my sketch to understand where I'm wrong? :

thanks and good day.
Mar

 

[Mike1967]

Good morning mike,

Take patience if I break again. I followed your advice and tried to remake the profiles in a sketch not 3d.
The same result doesn't develop my loft when you have time and want to take a look at my sketch to understand where I'm wrong? :

thanks and good day.
Mar

lacks the tangency of the bows with the lines.
Look at the file I posted yesterday, you'll see the differences.
I attach an image of your file's lack of tangence.

 

[19marco77]

lacks the tangency of the bows with the lines.
Look at the file I posted yesterday, you'll see the differences.
I attach an image of your file's lack of tangence.

but wait.... I noticed now that the bows of the round part do not have the center on the origin but decentralized of the same measure of the lines... I never would have come.
Thank you now I understand my mistake.:finger:

 

[Mike1967]

but wait.... I noticed now that the bows of the round part do not have the center on the origin but decentralized of the same measure of the lines... I never would have come.
Thank you now I understand my mistake.:finger:

Yes, it is.
Unfortunately I posted you a file not very precise, actually now I draw the circle with building line that I use as reference, in practice it is all parametric and completely defined. .
If I find it, you put the best model.

Bye.

 

[Mike1967]

but wait.... I noticed now that the bows of the round part do not have the center on the origin but decentralized of the same measure of the lines... I never would have come.
Thank you now I understand my mistake.:finger:

Here, I found my post where you can see what I was
explaining.

Hi.

 

[19marco77]

Here, I found my post where you can see what I was
explaining.

Hi.

The thing is to put a diameter to define the opening of the "cut".

Now I will try to do it with a similar system.

Thank you.

p.s. I'm glad to know that I'm not the only pippa in the hihihihihi system. . .

 

[Virginio84]

hello to all
I train you the hopper I'm trying to make.
I followed the guide is I can say that:
1) the planes are parallel
2) each profile is a sketch itself
3) there is line-arch-line correspondence between the two sketches
4) the arches are tangent to the two lines

but there is something that does not fit, or rather something that does not "fold" :biggrin:

Once I see the flat repetition, the bending lines do not appear.

thanks for the attention and good fun. . .

hoping not to have gone far from the topic of discussion and to have been quite clear

 

[PiegatoreSolidworks]

hello to all
I train you the hopper I'm trying to make.
I followed the guide is I can say that:
1) the planes are parallel
2) each profile is a sketch itself
3) there is line-arch-line correspondence between the two sketches
4) the arches are tangent to the two lines

but there is something that does not fit, or rather something that does not "fold" :biggrin:

Once I see the flat repetition, the bending lines do not appear.

thanks for the attention and good fun. . .

hoping not to have gone far from the topic of discussion and to have been quite clear

the fold lines cannot come because it is not foldable, it must be printed of press with male-female molds. to make the traces come, the straights of the two profiles must be parallel.

 

[Virginio84]

and there is a way to approximate it to a "explainable" sheet?

thanks for the answer

 

[tracciatura.net]

take a walk tracking.net

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

intervene on old posts of several years just to insert your own link and advertising is not the maximum saddle life in a forum. make yourself useful and participate actively by exposing your knowledge and giving advice on the place

 

[tracciatura.net]

the link has been put if someone like me does a google search and find this post can find a useful link, participate in an old post I don't think the case, participate I do it with my site where it has been for years I offer up traces in absolutely free form

 

[marcof]

participate I do it with my site where it has been for years I offer you all on traces in absolutely free form

you intended to participate in this forum.
that you participate in your site I consider it the least union.