• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

create a part from a set

  • Thread starter Thread starter roccolaser
  • Start date Start date
roccolaser said:
I wanted to know if I can create this reinforcement starting from a set..:smile:
Click to expand...
si, adding a part or changing a already present (multibody).
Considering that swx supports multibody, it is wasted to draw objects like these in environment together.
with the "saving" function you get a perfect file for that purpose.
 
Mike1967 said:
si, adding a part or changing a already present (multibody).
Considering that swx supports multibody, it is wasted to draw objects like these in environment together.
with the "saving" function you get a perfect file for that purpose.
Click to expand...
if you want to do it in the environment together you can do it by inserting the part of your ipe and then a new part that represents the handkerchief, or designed separately and then inserted or created directly in the axieme...:smile:
 
eboss said:
if you want to do it in the environment together you can do it by inserting the part of your ipe and then a new part that represents the handkerchief, or designed separately and then inserted or created directly in the axieme...:smile:
Click to expand...
... and I wrote... ?
I don't understand.
Maybe because it's only been 12 years I've been using swx... when the multibody still did not exist....:biggrin:
 
Mike1967 said:
... and I wrote... ?
I don't understand.
Maybe because it's only been 12 years I've been using swx... when the multibody still did not exist....:biggrin:
Click to expand...
in the sense that the multibody is very good but it might be wise to manage as a whole when using a pdm that manages the insertion of codes, processing cycles and raw materials in a management. . .
 
Mike1967 said:
Yes, adding a part or modifying one already present (multibody).
Considering that swx supports multibody, it is wasted to draw objects like these in environment together.
with the "saving" function you get a perfect file for that purpose.
Click to expand...
eboss said:
in the sense that the multibody is very good but it might be wise to manage as a whole when using a pdm that manages the insertion of codes, processing cycles and raw materials in a management. . .
Click to expand...
Right. .
 
roccolaser said:
You mean something like that?
Click to expand...
Here, you are on the good road, unfortunately your file is not multibody
because in the extrusion-extrusion function2 you have flagged "unisci result".
Moreover, your sheet, in case you add bending, would not unroll.
a similar file created with welding function and sheet metal.

Hi.
 
Here.

download the file and look carefully all steps (remove the Insert bar?

almost all the quotas present can change the part as I recalled them at the table through the function elements of the model .
I made the sheet especially in that way (procedure) to show you the various systems of design of sheet metal. the edges could have extruded them at the beginning.
Know that I, like so many others, spent the nights learning. . So try to make the most of our sacrifices.
if you have any other doubts ask, but first try to document you to the fullest.
Hi.
 

Attachments

thank you so much mike now I take a look at him, you are right for what you say in fact first I look for youtube before writing to you, the fact is also that I have a 10-month baby that is very lively and does not do anything at night, to my wife I come to find her very tired....:biggrin:
 
and the same mike, in the table instead gives me a mistake and comes out from the program.
 
Nothing is there when I open the part gives me a mistake
 

Attachments

  • errore.webp
    errore.webp
    9.7 KB · Views: 9

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 66 (members: 0, guests: 66)
Back
Top